Experiences of non-resident nurses in Australia's remote Northern Territory

Daniel Heidelbeer, Dean Carson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Introduction: There is emerging concern in the health literature about the impacts of non-resident work modes on the quality of service delivery particularly in sparsely populated or remote areas, but little is known about what non-resident health workers themselves see as the advantages and disadvantages of their modes of work, and whether non-resident workers face the same or different social/personal and professional barriers to rural and remote practice as their resident colleagues. Although literature from the resources sector provides insights into the expected social/personal advantages and disadvantages, very little is said about professional issues.

    Methods:
     This article reports on semi-structured interviews conducted with seven non-resident nurses working in remote locations in Australia’s Northern Territory in 2011. All nurses lived outside the Northern Territory when not at work. The interviews focussed on how the separation of place of residence and place of work affected nurses’ private and professional lives.

    Results: 
    Social/personal issues faced by these nurses are similar to what has been reported in the broader literature on non-resident work. Nurses who successfully engage in non-resident work develop strategies to manage their lives across multiple locations. However, questions are raised about the professional impacts of non-resident work, in terms of the continuing competency of the workers themselves, the performance of work teams that consist of resident and non-resident workers, and the maintenance of context-specific skills.

    Conclusions: 
    Non-resident work is likely to become more common in remote areas such as Australia’s Northern Territory because of the advantages workers experience in their personal lives. There is an urgent need to address professional issues associated with non-resident work modes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number2464
    Pages (from-to)1-12
    Number of pages12
    JournalRural and Remote Health
    Volume13
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Northern Territory
    nurse
    Nurses
    experience
    worker
    resident
    Interviews
    Health
    place of residence
    Workplace
    interview
    health
    Maintenance

    Cite this

    Heidelbeer, Daniel ; Carson, Dean. / Experiences of non-resident nurses in Australia's remote Northern Territory. In: Rural and Remote Health. 2013 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 1-12.
    @article{d9a9930c6784423e9eaaf4708d16f482,
    title = "Experiences of non-resident nurses in Australia's remote Northern Territory",
    abstract = "Introduction: There is emerging concern in the health literature about the impacts of non-resident work modes on the quality of service delivery particularly in sparsely populated or remote areas, but little is known about what non-resident health workers themselves see as the advantages and disadvantages of their modes of work, and whether non-resident workers face the same or different social/personal and professional barriers to rural and remote practice as their resident colleagues. Although literature from the resources sector provides insights into the expected social/personal advantages and disadvantages, very little is said about professional issues.Methods: This article reports on semi-structured interviews conducted with seven non-resident nurses working in remote locations in Australia’s Northern Territory in 2011. All nurses lived outside the Northern Territory when not at work. The interviews focussed on how the separation of place of residence and place of work affected nurses’ private and professional lives.Results: Social/personal issues faced by these nurses are similar to what has been reported in the broader literature on non-resident work. Nurses who successfully engage in non-resident work develop strategies to manage their lives across multiple locations. However, questions are raised about the professional impacts of non-resident work, in terms of the continuing competency of the workers themselves, the performance of work teams that consist of resident and non-resident workers, and the maintenance of context-specific skills.Conclusions: Non-resident work is likely to become more common in remote areas such as Australia’s Northern Territory because of the advantages workers experience in their personal lives. There is an urgent need to address professional issues associated with non-resident work modes.",
    author = "Daniel Heidelbeer and Dean Carson",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "1--12",
    journal = "Rural and Remote Health",
    issn = "1445-6354",
    publisher = "Australian Rural Health Education Network",
    number = "3",

    }

    Heidelbeer, D & Carson, D 2013, 'Experiences of non-resident nurses in Australia's remote Northern Territory', Rural and Remote Health, vol. 13, no. 3, 2464, pp. 1-12.

    Experiences of non-resident nurses in Australia's remote Northern Territory. / Heidelbeer, Daniel; Carson, Dean.

    In: Rural and Remote Health, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2464, 2013, p. 1-12.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Experiences of non-resident nurses in Australia's remote Northern Territory

    AU - Heidelbeer, Daniel

    AU - Carson, Dean

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Introduction: There is emerging concern in the health literature about the impacts of non-resident work modes on the quality of service delivery particularly in sparsely populated or remote areas, but little is known about what non-resident health workers themselves see as the advantages and disadvantages of their modes of work, and whether non-resident workers face the same or different social/personal and professional barriers to rural and remote practice as their resident colleagues. Although literature from the resources sector provides insights into the expected social/personal advantages and disadvantages, very little is said about professional issues.Methods: This article reports on semi-structured interviews conducted with seven non-resident nurses working in remote locations in Australia’s Northern Territory in 2011. All nurses lived outside the Northern Territory when not at work. The interviews focussed on how the separation of place of residence and place of work affected nurses’ private and professional lives.Results: Social/personal issues faced by these nurses are similar to what has been reported in the broader literature on non-resident work. Nurses who successfully engage in non-resident work develop strategies to manage their lives across multiple locations. However, questions are raised about the professional impacts of non-resident work, in terms of the continuing competency of the workers themselves, the performance of work teams that consist of resident and non-resident workers, and the maintenance of context-specific skills.Conclusions: Non-resident work is likely to become more common in remote areas such as Australia’s Northern Territory because of the advantages workers experience in their personal lives. There is an urgent need to address professional issues associated with non-resident work modes.

    AB - Introduction: There is emerging concern in the health literature about the impacts of non-resident work modes on the quality of service delivery particularly in sparsely populated or remote areas, but little is known about what non-resident health workers themselves see as the advantages and disadvantages of their modes of work, and whether non-resident workers face the same or different social/personal and professional barriers to rural and remote practice as their resident colleagues. Although literature from the resources sector provides insights into the expected social/personal advantages and disadvantages, very little is said about professional issues.Methods: This article reports on semi-structured interviews conducted with seven non-resident nurses working in remote locations in Australia’s Northern Territory in 2011. All nurses lived outside the Northern Territory when not at work. The interviews focussed on how the separation of place of residence and place of work affected nurses’ private and professional lives.Results: Social/personal issues faced by these nurses are similar to what has been reported in the broader literature on non-resident work. Nurses who successfully engage in non-resident work develop strategies to manage their lives across multiple locations. However, questions are raised about the professional impacts of non-resident work, in terms of the continuing competency of the workers themselves, the performance of work teams that consist of resident and non-resident workers, and the maintenance of context-specific skills.Conclusions: Non-resident work is likely to become more common in remote areas such as Australia’s Northern Territory because of the advantages workers experience in their personal lives. There is an urgent need to address professional issues associated with non-resident work modes.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 1

    EP - 12

    JO - Rural and Remote Health

    JF - Rural and Remote Health

    SN - 1445-6354

    IS - 3

    M1 - 2464

    ER -