Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna

Lynda Prior, Richard J Williams, David Bowman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    A fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck provides a possible explanation for the coexistence of trees and grasses in mesic savannas. The key element of this hypothesis is that saplings are particularly vulnerable to fire because they are small enough to be top-killed by grass fires, but unlike juveniles, they take several years to recover their original size. This limits the number of recruits into the adult size classes. Thus savanna vegetation may be maintained by a feedback whereby fire restricts the density of adult trees and allows a grass layer to develop, which provides fuel for subsequent fires. Here, we use results from a landscape-scale fire experiment in tropical Australia, to explore the possible existence of a recruitment bottleneck. This experiment compared tree recruitment and survival over 4 y under regimes of no fire, annual early and annual late dry-season fire. Stem mortality decreased with increasing stem height in the fire treatments but not in the unburnt treatment. Tree recruitment was 76-84% lower in the fire treatments than the unburnt treatment. Such fire-induced stem loss of saplings and reduced recruitment to the canopy layer in this eucalypt savanna are consistent with the predictions of the fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck hypothesis. � 2010 Cambridge University Press.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)595-603
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Tropical Ecology
    Volume26
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

    Fingerprint

    savanna
    savannas
    stem
    sapling
    grasses
    saplings
    stems
    grass
    coexistence
    dry season
    experiment
    canopy
    mortality
    vegetation
    prediction

    Cite this

    Prior, Lynda ; Williams, Richard J ; Bowman, David. / Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna. In: Journal of Tropical Ecology. 2010 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 595-603.
    @article{45235e3be71d49ed808518e3bc35cfbd,
    title = "Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna",
    abstract = "A fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck provides a possible explanation for the coexistence of trees and grasses in mesic savannas. The key element of this hypothesis is that saplings are particularly vulnerable to fire because they are small enough to be top-killed by grass fires, but unlike juveniles, they take several years to recover their original size. This limits the number of recruits into the adult size classes. Thus savanna vegetation may be maintained by a feedback whereby fire restricts the density of adult trees and allows a grass layer to develop, which provides fuel for subsequent fires. Here, we use results from a landscape-scale fire experiment in tropical Australia, to explore the possible existence of a recruitment bottleneck. This experiment compared tree recruitment and survival over 4 y under regimes of no fire, annual early and annual late dry-season fire. Stem mortality decreased with increasing stem height in the fire treatments but not in the unburnt treatment. Tree recruitment was 76-84{\%} lower in the fire treatments than the unburnt treatment. Such fire-induced stem loss of saplings and reduced recruitment to the canopy layer in this eucalypt savanna are consistent with the predictions of the fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck hypothesis. � 2010 Cambridge University Press.",
    keywords = "coexistence, evergreen forest, experimental study, fire behavior, forest canopy, grass, hypothesis testing, juvenile, landscape ecology, population bottleneck, recruitment (population dynamics), sapling, savanna, stand dynamics, stem, tropical environment, tropical forest, Australia, Eucalyptus, Poaceae",
    author = "Lynda Prior and Williams, {Richard J} and David Bowman",
    year = "2010",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1017/S0266467410000362",
    language = "English",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "595--603",
    journal = "Journal of Tropical Ecology",
    issn = "0266-4674",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "6",

    }

    Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna. / Prior, Lynda; Williams, Richard J; Bowman, David.

    In: Journal of Tropical Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 595-603.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna

    AU - Prior, Lynda

    AU - Williams, Richard J

    AU - Bowman, David

    PY - 2010/11

    Y1 - 2010/11

    N2 - A fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck provides a possible explanation for the coexistence of trees and grasses in mesic savannas. The key element of this hypothesis is that saplings are particularly vulnerable to fire because they are small enough to be top-killed by grass fires, but unlike juveniles, they take several years to recover their original size. This limits the number of recruits into the adult size classes. Thus savanna vegetation may be maintained by a feedback whereby fire restricts the density of adult trees and allows a grass layer to develop, which provides fuel for subsequent fires. Here, we use results from a landscape-scale fire experiment in tropical Australia, to explore the possible existence of a recruitment bottleneck. This experiment compared tree recruitment and survival over 4 y under regimes of no fire, annual early and annual late dry-season fire. Stem mortality decreased with increasing stem height in the fire treatments but not in the unburnt treatment. Tree recruitment was 76-84% lower in the fire treatments than the unburnt treatment. Such fire-induced stem loss of saplings and reduced recruitment to the canopy layer in this eucalypt savanna are consistent with the predictions of the fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck hypothesis. � 2010 Cambridge University Press.

    AB - A fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck provides a possible explanation for the coexistence of trees and grasses in mesic savannas. The key element of this hypothesis is that saplings are particularly vulnerable to fire because they are small enough to be top-killed by grass fires, but unlike juveniles, they take several years to recover their original size. This limits the number of recruits into the adult size classes. Thus savanna vegetation may be maintained by a feedback whereby fire restricts the density of adult trees and allows a grass layer to develop, which provides fuel for subsequent fires. Here, we use results from a landscape-scale fire experiment in tropical Australia, to explore the possible existence of a recruitment bottleneck. This experiment compared tree recruitment and survival over 4 y under regimes of no fire, annual early and annual late dry-season fire. Stem mortality decreased with increasing stem height in the fire treatments but not in the unburnt treatment. Tree recruitment was 76-84% lower in the fire treatments than the unburnt treatment. Such fire-induced stem loss of saplings and reduced recruitment to the canopy layer in this eucalypt savanna are consistent with the predictions of the fire-mediated recruitment bottleneck hypothesis. � 2010 Cambridge University Press.

    KW - coexistence

    KW - evergreen forest

    KW - experimental study

    KW - fire behavior

    KW - forest canopy

    KW - grass

    KW - hypothesis testing

    KW - juvenile

    KW - landscape ecology

    KW - population bottleneck

    KW - recruitment (population dynamics)

    KW - sapling

    KW - savanna

    KW - stand dynamics

    KW - stem

    KW - tropical environment

    KW - tropical forest

    KW - Australia

    KW - Eucalyptus

    KW - Poaceae

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251615382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0266467410000362

    DO - 10.1017/S0266467410000362

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 595

    EP - 603

    JO - Journal of Tropical Ecology

    JF - Journal of Tropical Ecology

    SN - 0266-4674

    IS - 6

    ER -