Exploring the benefits of molecular testing for gonorrhoea antibiotic resistance surveillance in remote settings

Ben B. Hui, Nathan Ryder, Jiunn Yih Su, James Ward, Marcus Y. Chen, Basil Donovan, Christopher K. Fairley, Rebecca J. Guy, Monica M. Lahra, Mathew G. Law, David M. Whiley, David G. Regan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Surveillance for gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is compromised by a move away from culture-based testing in favour of more convenient nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) tests. We assessed the potential benefit of a molecular resistance test in terms of the timeliness of detection of gonorrhoea AMR.

    Methods and Findings: An individual-based mathematical model was developed to describe the transmission of gonorrhoea in a remote Indigenous population in Australia.We estimated the impact of the molecular test on the time delay between first importation and the first confirmation that the prevalence of gonorrhoea AMR (resistance proportion) has breached the WHO-recommended 5%threshold (when a change in antibiotic should occur). In the remote setting evaluated in this study, the model predicts that when culture is the only available means of testing for AMR, the breach will only be detected when the actual prevalence of AMR in the population has already reached 8 - 18%, with an associated delay of ~43 - 69 months between first importation and detection. With the addition of a molecular resistance test, the number of samples for which AMR can be determined increases facilitating earlier detection at a lower resistance proportion. For the best case scenario, where AMR can be determined for all diagnostic samples, the alert would be triggered at least 8 months earlier than using culture alone and the resistance proportion will have only slightly exceeded the 5% notification threshold.

    Conclusions: Molecular tests have the potential to provide more timely warning of the emergence of gonorrhoea AMR. This in turn will facilitate earlier treatment switching and more targeted treatment, which has the potential to reduce the population impact of gonorrhoea AMR.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0133202
    Pages (from-to)1-14
    Number of pages14
    JournalPLoS One
    Volume10
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the benefits of molecular testing for gonorrhoea antibiotic resistance surveillance in remote settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hui, B. B., Ryder, N., Su, J. Y., Ward, J., Chen, M. Y., Donovan, B., Fairley, C. K., Guy, R. J., Lahra, M. M., Law, M. G., Whiley, D. M., & Regan, D. G. (2015). Exploring the benefits of molecular testing for gonorrhoea antibiotic resistance surveillance in remote settings. PLoS One, 10(7), 1-14. [e0133202]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133202