Farmers' intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments

empirical evidence from northern Australia

Romy Greiner, Daniel Gregg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The rate and extent of adoption of conservation practices by farmers is influenced, in principle, by characteristics of the practices and those of the farmers. Governments use policy instruments to increase the rate of adoption of practices which generate public benefits if it is deemed that privately optimal adoption rates will not lead to publicly optimal conservation outcomes. Recent nation-wide conservation programs in Australia have attracted criticism for low levels of effectiveness and efficiency. Could it be that program design has ignored key adoption factors, in particular characteristics of the target audience? If adoption is subject to personal factors, such as the motivations for farming, then it is likely that so are farmers' responses to policy approaches and instruments. In this case study, surveys were conducted of farmers in three regions within the tropical savannas of northern Australia, where land-use systems are characterized by large-scale broad-acre beef grazing enterprises. Inter alia, these surveys collected data on graziers' motivations, impediments to adoption of conservation practices, and perceived effectiveness of policy instruments in overcoming impediments. The research found that graziers had a very high level of conservation and lifestyle motivation and were motivated to lesser extents by financial/economic and social considerations, pointing to a strong stewardship ethic of graziers, or altruistic motif. Motivational profiles were significantly correlated with farmers' perceptions about what constrained them from implementing conservation based management systems. Motivational profiles also explained differences in farmers' perceptions of and stated propensity to interact with policy instruments, particularly at a regional scale and in the context of historical government interventions. On the basis of the empirical evidence presented, governments would be well advised to harness the diverse set of aspirations and motivations of farmers when designing conservation programs rather than. In particular, conservation programs need to take advantage of farmers' stewardship ethic for maximum effectiveness and efficiency, and minimize the risk of crowding out intrinsic motivation and altruistic behaviours.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)257-265
    Number of pages9
    JournalLand Use Policy
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    conservation practices
    intrinsic motivation
    farmer
    conservation
    farmers
    evidence
    conservation programs
    ethics
    financial economics
    moral philosophy
    altruistic behavior
    crowding out
    public benefits
    efficiency
    policy approach
    harness
    social benefit
    policy instrument
    lifestyle
    savanna

    Cite this

    @article{4521822768f540818ffe6d36350386ee,
    title = "Farmers' intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: empirical evidence from northern Australia",
    abstract = "The rate and extent of adoption of conservation practices by farmers is influenced, in principle, by characteristics of the practices and those of the farmers. Governments use policy instruments to increase the rate of adoption of practices which generate public benefits if it is deemed that privately optimal adoption rates will not lead to publicly optimal conservation outcomes. Recent nation-wide conservation programs in Australia have attracted criticism for low levels of effectiveness and efficiency. Could it be that program design has ignored key adoption factors, in particular characteristics of the target audience? If adoption is subject to personal factors, such as the motivations for farming, then it is likely that so are farmers' responses to policy approaches and instruments. In this case study, surveys were conducted of farmers in three regions within the tropical savannas of northern Australia, where land-use systems are characterized by large-scale broad-acre beef grazing enterprises. Inter alia, these surveys collected data on graziers' motivations, impediments to adoption of conservation practices, and perceived effectiveness of policy instruments in overcoming impediments. The research found that graziers had a very high level of conservation and lifestyle motivation and were motivated to lesser extents by financial/economic and social considerations, pointing to a strong stewardship ethic of graziers, or altruistic motif. Motivational profiles were significantly correlated with farmers' perceptions about what constrained them from implementing conservation based management systems. Motivational profiles also explained differences in farmers' perceptions of and stated propensity to interact with policy instruments, particularly at a regional scale and in the context of historical government interventions. On the basis of the empirical evidence presented, governments would be well advised to harness the diverse set of aspirations and motivations of farmers when designing conservation programs rather than. In particular, conservation programs need to take advantage of farmers' stewardship ethic for maximum effectiveness and efficiency, and minimize the risk of crowding out intrinsic motivation and altruistic behaviours.",
    keywords = "altruism, conservation management, farmers attitude, farmers knowledge, farming system, grazing management, land use planning, livestock farming, perception, policy implementation, savanna, Australia, Harness",
    author = "Romy Greiner and Daniel Gregg",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "257--265",
    journal = "Land Use Policy",
    issn = "0264-8377",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1",

    }

    Farmers' intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments : empirical evidence from northern Australia. / Greiner, Romy; Gregg, Daniel.

    In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2011, p. 257-265.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Farmers' intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments

    T2 - empirical evidence from northern Australia

    AU - Greiner, Romy

    AU - Gregg, Daniel

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - The rate and extent of adoption of conservation practices by farmers is influenced, in principle, by characteristics of the practices and those of the farmers. Governments use policy instruments to increase the rate of adoption of practices which generate public benefits if it is deemed that privately optimal adoption rates will not lead to publicly optimal conservation outcomes. Recent nation-wide conservation programs in Australia have attracted criticism for low levels of effectiveness and efficiency. Could it be that program design has ignored key adoption factors, in particular characteristics of the target audience? If adoption is subject to personal factors, such as the motivations for farming, then it is likely that so are farmers' responses to policy approaches and instruments. In this case study, surveys were conducted of farmers in three regions within the tropical savannas of northern Australia, where land-use systems are characterized by large-scale broad-acre beef grazing enterprises. Inter alia, these surveys collected data on graziers' motivations, impediments to adoption of conservation practices, and perceived effectiveness of policy instruments in overcoming impediments. The research found that graziers had a very high level of conservation and lifestyle motivation and were motivated to lesser extents by financial/economic and social considerations, pointing to a strong stewardship ethic of graziers, or altruistic motif. Motivational profiles were significantly correlated with farmers' perceptions about what constrained them from implementing conservation based management systems. Motivational profiles also explained differences in farmers' perceptions of and stated propensity to interact with policy instruments, particularly at a regional scale and in the context of historical government interventions. On the basis of the empirical evidence presented, governments would be well advised to harness the diverse set of aspirations and motivations of farmers when designing conservation programs rather than. In particular, conservation programs need to take advantage of farmers' stewardship ethic for maximum effectiveness and efficiency, and minimize the risk of crowding out intrinsic motivation and altruistic behaviours.

    AB - The rate and extent of adoption of conservation practices by farmers is influenced, in principle, by characteristics of the practices and those of the farmers. Governments use policy instruments to increase the rate of adoption of practices which generate public benefits if it is deemed that privately optimal adoption rates will not lead to publicly optimal conservation outcomes. Recent nation-wide conservation programs in Australia have attracted criticism for low levels of effectiveness and efficiency. Could it be that program design has ignored key adoption factors, in particular characteristics of the target audience? If adoption is subject to personal factors, such as the motivations for farming, then it is likely that so are farmers' responses to policy approaches and instruments. In this case study, surveys were conducted of farmers in three regions within the tropical savannas of northern Australia, where land-use systems are characterized by large-scale broad-acre beef grazing enterprises. Inter alia, these surveys collected data on graziers' motivations, impediments to adoption of conservation practices, and perceived effectiveness of policy instruments in overcoming impediments. The research found that graziers had a very high level of conservation and lifestyle motivation and were motivated to lesser extents by financial/economic and social considerations, pointing to a strong stewardship ethic of graziers, or altruistic motif. Motivational profiles were significantly correlated with farmers' perceptions about what constrained them from implementing conservation based management systems. Motivational profiles also explained differences in farmers' perceptions of and stated propensity to interact with policy instruments, particularly at a regional scale and in the context of historical government interventions. On the basis of the empirical evidence presented, governments would be well advised to harness the diverse set of aspirations and motivations of farmers when designing conservation programs rather than. In particular, conservation programs need to take advantage of farmers' stewardship ethic for maximum effectiveness and efficiency, and minimize the risk of crowding out intrinsic motivation and altruistic behaviours.

    KW - altruism

    KW - conservation management

    KW - farmers attitude

    KW - farmers knowledge

    KW - farming system

    KW - grazing management

    KW - land use planning

    KW - livestock farming

    KW - perception

    KW - policy implementation

    KW - savanna

    KW - Australia

    KW - Harness

    U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006

    DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 257

    EP - 265

    JO - Land Use Policy

    JF - Land Use Policy

    SN - 0264-8377

    IS - 1

    ER -