Abstract
Background: Glucose-6-Phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common enzymopathy worldwide, no reliable bedside diagnostic tests to quantify G6PD activity exist. This study evaluated two novel quantitative G6PD diagnostics.
Methods: Participants with known G6PD activity were enrolled in
Bangladesh. G6PD activity was measured by spectrophotometry, Biosensor (BS;
AccessBio/CareStart, USA) and STANDARD G6PD (SG; SDBiosensor, ROK). G6PD
activity was measured repeatedly in a subset of samples stored at room
temperature and 4°C.
Results: 158 participants were enrolled, 152 samples tested by BS, 108
samples by SG and 102 samples were tested by all three methods. In comparison
to spectrophotometry BS had sensitivity and specificity of 72% (95%CI: 53–86)
and 100% (95%CI: 97–100) at 30% cut off respectively, while SG had a
sensitivity of 100% (95%CI: 88–100) and specificity of 97% (95%CI: 91–99) at
the same cut off. The sensitivity and specificity at 70% cut off activity were
71% (95%CI: 59–82) and 98% (95%CI, 92–100) respectively for BS and 89% (95%CI:
77–96) and 93% (95%CI: 83–98) respectively for SG. When an optimal cut-off was
applied the sensitivity of the BS at 70 cut off rose to 91% [95%CI: 80–96] and
specificity to 82% [95%CI: 83–89]; a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of
the SG (p = 0.879). G6PD activity dropped significantly (-0.31U/gHb, 95%CI:
-0.61 to -0.01, p = 0.022) within 24 hours in samples stored at room
temperature, but did not fall below 90% of baseline activity until day 13
(-0.87U/gHb, 95%CI: (-1.11 to -0.62), p<0.001).
Conclusion: BS and SG are the first quantitative diagnostics to
measure G6PD activity reliably at the bedside and represent suitable
alternatives to spectrophotometry in resource poor settings. If samples are
stored at 4°C, G6PD activity can be measured reliably for at least 7 days after
sample collection.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e0206331 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-13 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | PLoS One |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Nov 2018 |