First continuous shipboard δ 18O and δD measurements in sea water by diffusion sampling-cavity ring-down spectrometry

N. C. Munksgaard, C. M. Wurster, A. Bass, I. Zagorskis, M. I. Bird

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Combined measurements of salinity and the oxygen/hydrogen stable isotope composition of marine waters can characterise processes such as freshwater mixing, evaporation, precipitation and sea-ice formation. However, stable isotope data with high spatial and temporal resolution are necessary for a detailed understanding of mixed water bodies with multiple inputs. So far analysis of δ 18O and δD values in water has been a relatively expensive, laboratory-based technique requiring collection of discrete samples. This has greatly limited the scope and scale of field research that can be undertaken using stable isotope analysis. Here, we report the first continuous shipboard measurements of δ 18O and δD values in water by diffusion sampling-cavity ring-down spectrometry. Combined with continuous salinity recordings, a data set of nearly 6,000 measurements was made at 30-s intervals during a 3-day voyage through the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Our results show that continuous shipboard measurement of δ 18O/δD values provides additional discriminatory power for assessing water mass formation processes and histories. Precise identification of river plumes within the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon was only possible because unique δ 18O/δD-salinity relationships of individual plumes were measured at high spatial and temporal resolution. The main advantage of this new technique is the ability to collect continuous, real-time isotope data at a small fraction of the cost of traditional isotope analysi s of discrete samples. Water δ 18O and δD values measured by diffusion sampling-cavity ring-down spectrometry and laboratory-based isotope ratio mass spectrometry have similar accuracy and precision.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)301-307
    Number of pages7
    JournalEnvironmental Chemistry Letters
    Volume10
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

      Fingerprint

    Cite this