Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization

Thomas Diefenbach, J.A.A.b Sillince

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper addresses the paradox that despite all organizational change towards flatter and postmodern organizations, hierarchical order is quite persistent. We develop a differentiated understanding of hierarchy as either formal or informal and apply this analytical framework to several types of organization. The analysis reveals that hierarchy is much more widespread than thought; in particular, postmodern, representative democratic and network organizations are much less 'alternative' and 'hierarchy-free' than their labels and common understanding may suggest. The main argument is that the persistence of hierarchy in different types of organization can be explained by different dynamic relationships between formal and informal hierarchy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1515-1537
Number of pages23
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume32
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Labels
Paradox
Organizational change
Network organization
Persistence
Hierarchical organization

Cite this

Diefenbach, Thomas ; Sillince, J.A.A.b. / Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization. In: Organization Studies. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 11. pp. 1515-1537.
@article{917c98431b4942b0bf575e1b7b0da62b,
title = "Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization",
abstract = "This paper addresses the paradox that despite all organizational change towards flatter and postmodern organizations, hierarchical order is quite persistent. We develop a differentiated understanding of hierarchy as either formal or informal and apply this analytical framework to several types of organization. The analysis reveals that hierarchy is much more widespread than thought; in particular, postmodern, representative democratic and network organizations are much less 'alternative' and 'hierarchy-free' than their labels and common understanding may suggest. The main argument is that the persistence of hierarchy in different types of organization can be explained by different dynamic relationships between formal and informal hierarchy.",
author = "Thomas Diefenbach and J.A.A.b Sillince",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1177/0170840611421254",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1515--1537",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "11",

}

Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization. / Diefenbach, Thomas; Sillince, J.A.A.b.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2011, p. 1515-1537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization

AU - Diefenbach, Thomas

AU - Sillince, J.A.A.b

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper addresses the paradox that despite all organizational change towards flatter and postmodern organizations, hierarchical order is quite persistent. We develop a differentiated understanding of hierarchy as either formal or informal and apply this analytical framework to several types of organization. The analysis reveals that hierarchy is much more widespread than thought; in particular, postmodern, representative democratic and network organizations are much less 'alternative' and 'hierarchy-free' than their labels and common understanding may suggest. The main argument is that the persistence of hierarchy in different types of organization can be explained by different dynamic relationships between formal and informal hierarchy.

AB - This paper addresses the paradox that despite all organizational change towards flatter and postmodern organizations, hierarchical order is quite persistent. We develop a differentiated understanding of hierarchy as either formal or informal and apply this analytical framework to several types of organization. The analysis reveals that hierarchy is much more widespread than thought; in particular, postmodern, representative democratic and network organizations are much less 'alternative' and 'hierarchy-free' than their labels and common understanding may suggest. The main argument is that the persistence of hierarchy in different types of organization can be explained by different dynamic relationships between formal and informal hierarchy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80355129273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0170840611421254

DO - 10.1177/0170840611421254

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1515

EP - 1537

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 11

ER -