Abstract
Nationalized banks in poor countries often ration rural credit. This creates demand for loans from monopolistic landlord/moneylenders who often interlink credit and product contracts allowing the latter to extract more of the tenant's consumer surplus. In the presence of asymmetric information such arrangements can be inefficient. We find that increasing the fixed credit allocation to the rural sector at a subsidized rate does not reduce that inefficiency. The entire benefit of the subsidy is extracted by the moneylender. An alternative policy of providing credit at subsidized rates but in a flexible manner is more effective in reducing the inefficiency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-325 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Formal and informal sector credit institutions and interlinkage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver