TY - JOUR
T1 - Goals, challenges, and next steps in transdisciplinary fisheries research
T2 - Perspectives and experiences from early-career researchers
AU - Nyboer, Elizabeth A.
AU - Reid, Andrea J.
AU - Jeanson, Amanda L.
AU - Kelly, Rachel
AU - Mackay, Mary
AU - House, Jenny
AU - Arnold, Sarah M.
AU - Simonin, Paul W.
AU - Sedanza, Mary Grace C.
AU - Rice, Emma D.
AU - Quiros, T. E.Angela L.
AU - Pierucci, Andrea
AU - Ortega-Cisneros, Kelly
AU - Nakamura, Julia N.
AU - Melli, Valentina
AU - Mbabazi, Stella
AU - Martins, Mariana S.L.
AU - Ledesma, Anne Brigette B.
AU - Obregón, Clara
AU - Labatt, Chepkemboi K.
AU - Kadykalo, Andrew N.
AU - Heldsinger, Michael
AU - Green, Madeline E.
AU - Fuller, Jessica L.
AU - Franco-Meléndez, Milagros
AU - Burnett, Matthew J.
AU - Bolin, Jessica A.
AU - Andrade-Vera, Solange
AU - Cooke, Steven J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding was provided to EAN by the Fonds de Recherche du Quebec – nature et technologie grant number 295667.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Fisheries are highly complex social-ecological systems that often face ‘wicked’ problems from unsustainable resource management to climate change. Addressing these challenges requires transdisciplinary approaches that integrate perspectives across scientific disciplines and knowledge systems. Despite widespread calls for transdisciplinary fisheries research (TFR), there are still limitations in personal and institutional capacity to conduct and support this work to the highest potential. The viewpoints of early career researchers (ECRs) in this field can illuminate challenges and promote systemic change within fisheries research. This paper presents the perspectives of ECRs from across the globe, gathered through a virtual workshop held during the 2021 World Fisheries Congress, on goals, challenges, and future potential for TFR. Big picture goals for TFR were guided by principles of co-production and included (i) integrating transdisciplinary thinking at all stages of the research process, (ii) ensuring that research is inclusive and equitable, (iii) co-creating knowledge that is credible, relevant, actionable, and impactful, and (iv) consistently communicating with partners. Institutional inertia, lack of recognition of the extra time and labour required for TFR, and lack of skill development opportunities were identified as three key barriers in conducting TFR. Several critical actions were identified to help ECRs, established researchers, and institutions reach these goals. We encourage ECRs to form peer-mentorship networks to guide each other along the way. We suggest that established researchers ensure consistent mentorship while also giving space to ECR voices. Actions for institutions include retooling education programs, developing and implementing new metrics of impact, and critically examining individualism and privilege in academia. We suggest that the opportunities and actions identified here, if widely embraced now, can enable research that addresses complex challenges facing fishery systems contributing to a healthier future for fish and humans alike.
AB - Fisheries are highly complex social-ecological systems that often face ‘wicked’ problems from unsustainable resource management to climate change. Addressing these challenges requires transdisciplinary approaches that integrate perspectives across scientific disciplines and knowledge systems. Despite widespread calls for transdisciplinary fisheries research (TFR), there are still limitations in personal and institutional capacity to conduct and support this work to the highest potential. The viewpoints of early career researchers (ECRs) in this field can illuminate challenges and promote systemic change within fisheries research. This paper presents the perspectives of ECRs from across the globe, gathered through a virtual workshop held during the 2021 World Fisheries Congress, on goals, challenges, and future potential for TFR. Big picture goals for TFR were guided by principles of co-production and included (i) integrating transdisciplinary thinking at all stages of the research process, (ii) ensuring that research is inclusive and equitable, (iii) co-creating knowledge that is credible, relevant, actionable, and impactful, and (iv) consistently communicating with partners. Institutional inertia, lack of recognition of the extra time and labour required for TFR, and lack of skill development opportunities were identified as three key barriers in conducting TFR. Several critical actions were identified to help ECRs, established researchers, and institutions reach these goals. We encourage ECRs to form peer-mentorship networks to guide each other along the way. We suggest that established researchers ensure consistent mentorship while also giving space to ECR voices. Actions for institutions include retooling education programs, developing and implementing new metrics of impact, and critically examining individualism and privilege in academia. We suggest that the opportunities and actions identified here, if widely embraced now, can enable research that addresses complex challenges facing fishery systems contributing to a healthier future for fish and humans alike.
KW - Co-production
KW - Institutions
KW - Knowledge transformation
KW - Mentorship
KW - Social-ecological systems
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135507540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11160-022-09719-6
DO - 10.1007/s11160-022-09719-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135507540
SN - 0960-3166
VL - 33
SP - 349
EP - 374
JO - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
JF - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
IS - 2
ER -