Higher degree research by numbers: Beyond the critiques of neo-liberalism

Liam Grealy, Timothy Laurie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article argues that strong theories of neo-liberalism do not provide an adequate frame for understanding the ways that measurement practices come to be embedded in the life-worlds of those working in higher education. We argue that neo-liberal metrics need to be understood from the viewpoint of their social usage, alongside other practices of qualification and quantification. In particular, this article maps the specific variables attending measurement in higher degree research programmes, as the key sites that familiarize students with measurement practices around research and teaching. With regard to the incremental reframing of doctoral study as a utilitarian pursuit, we suggest a need to better identify the singular and immeasurable features of long-term research projects, and argue for a revitalized notion of failure. In this context, this article suggests that many critiques of neo-liberalism do not sufficiently advance alternative ways to think about the purposes and limitations of higher education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-471
Number of pages14
JournalHigher Education Research and Development
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Higher degree research by numbers: Beyond the critiques of neo-liberalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this