How Australian dual registrants identified as midwives to meet national registration-renewal requirements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Aim: A theoretical discussion using categorisation theory to discuss the final analysis of findings from research which investigated midwives’ responses to the changed registration-renewal requirements in Australia after the introduction of national registration.

Background: In 2010 the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act introduced national registration to standardise the regulation of health professionals in Australia. Annual registration-renewal standards required all health professionals to meet the same standards of clear police check, insurance for scope of practice, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and Recency of Practice (ROP).

Question: How did dual registered midwives respond to the changed registration-renewal requirements when national registration was introduced?

Methods: A longitudinal single case study was conducted in two phases between 2011–2013 with a purposive sample of 24 midwives from five states of Australia to perform individual or group interviews.

Findings: Participants used inclusion and exclusion criteria to create boundaries around practice to illustrate how they met the registration-renewal standards. Accentuation (exaggeration) of practice helped them define their separate professional registrations. Boundaries included the type of person being cared for, practice activities. and place of practice.

Conclusion: The theory of categorisation helped explain the dual registrants’ behaviour and rationalise their midwifery responses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-57
Number of pages8
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Midwifery
Health
Professional Practice
Police
Insurance
Interviews
Research

Cite this

@article{6fbc002053674e28abad55ce9f368077,
title = "How Australian dual registrants identified as midwives to meet national registration-renewal requirements",
abstract = "Aim: A theoretical discussion using categorisation theory to discuss the final analysis of findings from research which investigated midwives’ responses to the changed registration-renewal requirements in Australia after the introduction of national registration. Background: In 2010 the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act introduced national registration to standardise the regulation of health professionals in Australia. Annual registration-renewal standards required all health professionals to meet the same standards of clear police check, insurance for scope of practice, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and Recency of Practice (ROP). Question: How did dual registered midwives respond to the changed registration-renewal requirements when national registration was introduced? Methods: A longitudinal single case study was conducted in two phases between 2011–2013 with a purposive sample of 24 midwives from five states of Australia to perform individual or group interviews. Findings: Participants used inclusion and exclusion criteria to create boundaries around practice to illustrate how they met the registration-renewal standards. Accentuation (exaggeration) of practice helped them define their separate professional registrations. Boundaries included the type of person being cared for, practice activities. and place of practice. Conclusion: The theory of categorisation helped explain the dual registrants’ behaviour and rationalise their midwifery responses.",
keywords = "Boundaries, Categorisation theory, National registration, Recency of practice standard, Registration-renewal",
author = "Michelle Gray",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "50--57",
journal = "Women and Birth",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

How Australian dual registrants identified as midwives to meet national registration-renewal requirements. / Gray, Michelle.

In: Women and Birth, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 50-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Australian dual registrants identified as midwives to meet national registration-renewal requirements

AU - Gray, Michelle

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Aim: A theoretical discussion using categorisation theory to discuss the final analysis of findings from research which investigated midwives’ responses to the changed registration-renewal requirements in Australia after the introduction of national registration. Background: In 2010 the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act introduced national registration to standardise the regulation of health professionals in Australia. Annual registration-renewal standards required all health professionals to meet the same standards of clear police check, insurance for scope of practice, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and Recency of Practice (ROP). Question: How did dual registered midwives respond to the changed registration-renewal requirements when national registration was introduced? Methods: A longitudinal single case study was conducted in two phases between 2011–2013 with a purposive sample of 24 midwives from five states of Australia to perform individual or group interviews. Findings: Participants used inclusion and exclusion criteria to create boundaries around practice to illustrate how they met the registration-renewal standards. Accentuation (exaggeration) of practice helped them define their separate professional registrations. Boundaries included the type of person being cared for, practice activities. and place of practice. Conclusion: The theory of categorisation helped explain the dual registrants’ behaviour and rationalise their midwifery responses.

AB - Aim: A theoretical discussion using categorisation theory to discuss the final analysis of findings from research which investigated midwives’ responses to the changed registration-renewal requirements in Australia after the introduction of national registration. Background: In 2010 the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act introduced national registration to standardise the regulation of health professionals in Australia. Annual registration-renewal standards required all health professionals to meet the same standards of clear police check, insurance for scope of practice, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and Recency of Practice (ROP). Question: How did dual registered midwives respond to the changed registration-renewal requirements when national registration was introduced? Methods: A longitudinal single case study was conducted in two phases between 2011–2013 with a purposive sample of 24 midwives from five states of Australia to perform individual or group interviews. Findings: Participants used inclusion and exclusion criteria to create boundaries around practice to illustrate how they met the registration-renewal standards. Accentuation (exaggeration) of practice helped them define their separate professional registrations. Boundaries included the type of person being cared for, practice activities. and place of practice. Conclusion: The theory of categorisation helped explain the dual registrants’ behaviour and rationalise their midwifery responses.

KW - Boundaries

KW - Categorisation theory

KW - National registration

KW - Recency of practice standard

KW - Registration-renewal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048094834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 50

EP - 57

JO - Women and Birth

JF - Women and Birth

SN - 1871-5192

IS - 1

ER -