Hybrid Instrumentation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Three Different Instrumentation Techniques

Peter Obid, Reza Danyali, Rebecca Kueny, Gerd Huber, Michael Reichl, Alexander Richter, Thomas Niemeyer, Michael Morlock, Klaus Püschel, Hüseyin Übeyli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Study Design: Ex vivo human cadaveric study. 

Objective: The development or progression of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after spine stabilization and fusion is a major problem in spine surgery. Apart from optimal balancing of the sagittal profile, dynamic instrumentation is often suggested to prevent or impede ASD. Hybrid instrumentation is used to gain stabilization while allowing motion to avoid hypermobility in the adjacent segment. In this biomechanical study, the effects of two different hybrid instrumentations on human cadaver spines were evaluated and compared with a rigid instrumentation. 

Methods: Eighteen human cadaver spines (T11-L5) were subdivided into three groups: rigid, dynamic, and hook comprising six spines each. Clinical parameters and initial mechanical characteristics were consistent among groups. All specimens received rigid fixation from L3-L5 followed by application of a free bending load of extension and flexion. The range of motion (ROM) for every segment was evaluated. For the rigid group, further rigid fixation from L1-L5 was applied. A dynamic Elaspine system (Spinelab AG, Winterthur, Switzerland) was applied from L1 to L3 for the dynamic group, and the hook group was instrumented with additional laminar hooks at L1-L3. ROM was then evaluated again. 

Results: There was no significant difference in ROM among the three instrumentation techniques. 

Conclusion: Based on this data, the intended advantage of a hybrid or dynamic instrumentation might not be achieved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-53
Number of pages7
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hybrid Instrumentation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Three Different Instrumentation Techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Obid, P., Danyali, R., Kueny, R., Huber, G., Reichl, M., Richter, A., Niemeyer, T., Morlock, M., Püschel, K., & Übeyli, H. (2017). Hybrid Instrumentation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Three Different Instrumentation Techniques. Global Spine Journal, 7(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583945