Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Hypospadias is a term that refers to the opening of the urethra along the shaft of the penis/phallus. Research has suggested that 45% of men have some degree of hypospadias and while it is not always considered ‘intersex’ it can influence gender assignment, gender role and gender identity. Moreover, the presence of hypospadias impacts on the medical ‘gaze’ and its decision regarding gender. Additionally it is the medical profession that prescribes non-consensual and sometimes unsuccessful ‘corrective’ surgeries resulting in scarring, leakage and life-long psycho-emotional trauma for infants and children whose bodies do not conform to what is socially acceptable as ‘male’ or ‘female’. This paper investigates current discourses of gender segregated public toilets and accompanying dualistic socio-urinary practices and the role they play in the medical ‘gaze’. Gender segregated public toilets were installed in the nineteenth century amidst the social-cultural context of protecting ‘weak women’ from lascivious men in the work-place; it is argued that little has changed. Although not all intersex individuals nor men and boys with hypospadias would position their gender identities outside the norm they at the very least physically occupy bodies that are not privileged and thus they call into question the architectural and discursive spaces of gender segregated public toilets. Under consideration here is how the medical profession determines the “adequacy” of the penis/phallus with vague references to the “locker room” and “peeing contests”—what this author refers to as the ‘panopticon of the phallus’. While intersex individuals occupy a separate socio-political space to transgendered people this paper employs transgender theory and concepts such as Judith Jack Halberstam’s ‘bathroom problem’ to analyze current debates around gender neutral public toilets and socio-urinary practices: namely, the privilege ascribed to men’s standing position for urination. This paper draws on the psychosocial self-reflections of hypospadiac men and boys as witnessed in their narratives. As a result it is argued that disrupting the architectural and discursive space of gender segregated public toilets may reverberate back onto the medicalisation of intersex and the non-consensual ‘corrective’ hypospadiac surgery.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMasculinities in a Global Era
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages215-228
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4614-6931-5
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4614-6930-8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Publication series

    Name International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4)
    Volume4

    Fingerprint

    gender
    surgery
    profession
    medicalization
    reflexivity
    role play
    gender role
    privilege
    trauma
    infant
    nineteenth century
    workplace
    narrative
    discourse

    Cite this

    Kerry, S. (2014). Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices. In Masculinities in a Global Era (pp. 215-228). ( International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4); Vol. 4). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6931-5_12
    Kerry, Stephen. / Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices. Masculinities in a Global Era . New York : Springer, 2014. pp. 215-228 ( International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4)).
    @inbook{da1028679ff241388eefe9eae03cb3e4,
    title = "Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices",
    abstract = "Hypospadias is a term that refers to the opening of the urethra along the shaft of the penis/phallus. Research has suggested that 45{\%} of men have some degree of hypospadias and while it is not always considered ‘intersex’ it can influence gender assignment, gender role and gender identity. Moreover, the presence of hypospadias impacts on the medical ‘gaze’ and its decision regarding gender. Additionally it is the medical profession that prescribes non-consensual and sometimes unsuccessful ‘corrective’ surgeries resulting in scarring, leakage and life-long psycho-emotional trauma for infants and children whose bodies do not conform to what is socially acceptable as ‘male’ or ‘female’. This paper investigates current discourses of gender segregated public toilets and accompanying dualistic socio-urinary practices and the role they play in the medical ‘gaze’. Gender segregated public toilets were installed in the nineteenth century amidst the social-cultural context of protecting ‘weak women’ from lascivious men in the work-place; it is argued that little has changed. Although not all intersex individuals nor men and boys with hypospadias would position their gender identities outside the norm they at the very least physically occupy bodies that are not privileged and thus they call into question the architectural and discursive spaces of gender segregated public toilets. Under consideration here is how the medical profession determines the “adequacy” of the penis/phallus with vague references to the “locker room” and “peeing contests”—what this author refers to as the ‘panopticon of the phallus’. While intersex individuals occupy a separate socio-political space to transgendered people this paper employs transgender theory and concepts such as Judith Jack Halberstam’s ‘bathroom problem’ to analyze current debates around gender neutral public toilets and socio-urinary practices: namely, the privilege ascribed to men’s standing position for urination. This paper draws on the psychosocial self-reflections of hypospadiac men and boys as witnessed in their narratives. As a result it is argued that disrupting the architectural and discursive space of gender segregated public toilets may reverberate back onto the medicalisation of intersex and the non-consensual ‘corrective’ hypospadiac surgery.",
    author = "Stephen Kerry",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-6931-5_12",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-4614-6930-8",
    series = "International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4)",
    publisher = "Springer",
    pages = "215--228",
    booktitle = "Masculinities in a Global Era",
    address = "Switzerland",

    }

    Kerry, S 2014, Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices. in Masculinities in a Global Era . International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4), vol. 4, Springer, New York, pp. 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6931-5_12

    Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices. / Kerry, Stephen.

    Masculinities in a Global Era . New York : Springer, 2014. p. 215-228 ( International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4); Vol. 4).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices

    AU - Kerry, Stephen

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Hypospadias is a term that refers to the opening of the urethra along the shaft of the penis/phallus. Research has suggested that 45% of men have some degree of hypospadias and while it is not always considered ‘intersex’ it can influence gender assignment, gender role and gender identity. Moreover, the presence of hypospadias impacts on the medical ‘gaze’ and its decision regarding gender. Additionally it is the medical profession that prescribes non-consensual and sometimes unsuccessful ‘corrective’ surgeries resulting in scarring, leakage and life-long psycho-emotional trauma for infants and children whose bodies do not conform to what is socially acceptable as ‘male’ or ‘female’. This paper investigates current discourses of gender segregated public toilets and accompanying dualistic socio-urinary practices and the role they play in the medical ‘gaze’. Gender segregated public toilets were installed in the nineteenth century amidst the social-cultural context of protecting ‘weak women’ from lascivious men in the work-place; it is argued that little has changed. Although not all intersex individuals nor men and boys with hypospadias would position their gender identities outside the norm they at the very least physically occupy bodies that are not privileged and thus they call into question the architectural and discursive spaces of gender segregated public toilets. Under consideration here is how the medical profession determines the “adequacy” of the penis/phallus with vague references to the “locker room” and “peeing contests”—what this author refers to as the ‘panopticon of the phallus’. While intersex individuals occupy a separate socio-political space to transgendered people this paper employs transgender theory and concepts such as Judith Jack Halberstam’s ‘bathroom problem’ to analyze current debates around gender neutral public toilets and socio-urinary practices: namely, the privilege ascribed to men’s standing position for urination. This paper draws on the psychosocial self-reflections of hypospadiac men and boys as witnessed in their narratives. As a result it is argued that disrupting the architectural and discursive space of gender segregated public toilets may reverberate back onto the medicalisation of intersex and the non-consensual ‘corrective’ hypospadiac surgery.

    AB - Hypospadias is a term that refers to the opening of the urethra along the shaft of the penis/phallus. Research has suggested that 45% of men have some degree of hypospadias and while it is not always considered ‘intersex’ it can influence gender assignment, gender role and gender identity. Moreover, the presence of hypospadias impacts on the medical ‘gaze’ and its decision regarding gender. Additionally it is the medical profession that prescribes non-consensual and sometimes unsuccessful ‘corrective’ surgeries resulting in scarring, leakage and life-long psycho-emotional trauma for infants and children whose bodies do not conform to what is socially acceptable as ‘male’ or ‘female’. This paper investigates current discourses of gender segregated public toilets and accompanying dualistic socio-urinary practices and the role they play in the medical ‘gaze’. Gender segregated public toilets were installed in the nineteenth century amidst the social-cultural context of protecting ‘weak women’ from lascivious men in the work-place; it is argued that little has changed. Although not all intersex individuals nor men and boys with hypospadias would position their gender identities outside the norm they at the very least physically occupy bodies that are not privileged and thus they call into question the architectural and discursive spaces of gender segregated public toilets. Under consideration here is how the medical profession determines the “adequacy” of the penis/phallus with vague references to the “locker room” and “peeing contests”—what this author refers to as the ‘panopticon of the phallus’. While intersex individuals occupy a separate socio-political space to transgendered people this paper employs transgender theory and concepts such as Judith Jack Halberstam’s ‘bathroom problem’ to analyze current debates around gender neutral public toilets and socio-urinary practices: namely, the privilege ascribed to men’s standing position for urination. This paper draws on the psychosocial self-reflections of hypospadiac men and boys as witnessed in their narratives. As a result it is argued that disrupting the architectural and discursive space of gender segregated public toilets may reverberate back onto the medicalisation of intersex and the non-consensual ‘corrective’ hypospadiac surgery.

    UR - http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781461469308

    U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-6931-5_12

    DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-6931-5_12

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978-1-4614-6930-8

    T3 - International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4)

    SP - 215

    EP - 228

    BT - Masculinities in a Global Era

    PB - Springer

    CY - New York

    ER -

    Kerry S. Hypospadias, the ‘Bathroom Panopticon’ and Men’s Psychological and Social Urinary Practices. In Masculinities in a Global Era . New York: Springer. 2014. p. 215-228. ( International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP, volume 4)). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6931-5_12