Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems

Laurence E. Berry, Don A. Driscoll, John A. Stein, Wade Blanchard, Sam C. Banks, Ross A. Bradstock, David B. Lindenmayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The increasing frequency of large, high-severity fires threatens the survival of old-growth specialist fauna in fire-prone forests. Within topographically diverse montane forests, areas that experience less severe or fewer fires compared with those prevailing in the landscape may present unique resource opportunities enabling old-growth specialist fauna to survive. Statistical landscape models that identify the extent and distribution of potential fire refuges may assist land managers to incorporate these areas into relevant biodiversity conservation strategies. We used a case study in an Australian wet montane forest to establish how predictive fire simulation models can be interpreted as management tools to identify potential fire refuges. We examined the relationship between the probability of fire refuge occurrence as predicted by an existing fire refuge model and fire severity experienced during a large wildfire. We also examined the extent to which local fire severity was influenced by fire severity in the surrounding landscape. We used a combination of statistical approaches, including generalized linear modeling, variogram analysis, and receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve analysis (ROC AUC). We found that the amount of unburned habitat and the factors influencing the retention and location of fire refuges varied with fire conditions. Under extreme fire conditions, the distribution of fire refuges was limited to only extremely sheltered, fire-resistant regions of the landscape. During extreme fire conditions, fire severity patterns were largely determined by stochastic factors that could not be predicted by the model. When fire conditions were moderate, physical landscape properties appeared to mediate fire severity distribution. Our study demonstrates that land managers can employ predictive landscape fire models to identify the broader climatic and spatial domain within which fire refuges are likely to be present. It is essential that within these envelopes, forest is protected from logging, roads, and other developments so that the ecological processes related to the establishment and subsequent use of fire refuges are maintained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2337-2348
Number of pages12
JournalEcological Applications
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

refuge
forest ecosystem
montane forest
fauna
variogram

Cite this

Berry, L. E., Driscoll, D. A., Stein, J. A., Blanchard, W., Banks, S. C., Bradstock, R. A., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2015). Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 25(8), 2337-2348. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1699.1
Berry, Laurence E. ; Driscoll, Don A. ; Stein, John A. ; Blanchard, Wade ; Banks, Sam C. ; Bradstock, Ross A. ; Lindenmayer, David B. / Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems. In: Ecological Applications. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 8. pp. 2337-2348.
@article{9965e7df6149456c92219f436a472e89,
title = "Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems",
abstract = "The increasing frequency of large, high-severity fires threatens the survival of old-growth specialist fauna in fire-prone forests. Within topographically diverse montane forests, areas that experience less severe or fewer fires compared with those prevailing in the landscape may present unique resource opportunities enabling old-growth specialist fauna to survive. Statistical landscape models that identify the extent and distribution of potential fire refuges may assist land managers to incorporate these areas into relevant biodiversity conservation strategies. We used a case study in an Australian wet montane forest to establish how predictive fire simulation models can be interpreted as management tools to identify potential fire refuges. We examined the relationship between the probability of fire refuge occurrence as predicted by an existing fire refuge model and fire severity experienced during a large wildfire. We also examined the extent to which local fire severity was influenced by fire severity in the surrounding landscape. We used a combination of statistical approaches, including generalized linear modeling, variogram analysis, and receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve analysis (ROC AUC). We found that the amount of unburned habitat and the factors influencing the retention and location of fire refuges varied with fire conditions. Under extreme fire conditions, the distribution of fire refuges was limited to only extremely sheltered, fire-resistant regions of the landscape. During extreme fire conditions, fire severity patterns were largely determined by stochastic factors that could not be predicted by the model. When fire conditions were moderate, physical landscape properties appeared to mediate fire severity distribution. Our study demonstrates that land managers can employ predictive landscape fire models to identify the broader climatic and spatial domain within which fire refuges are likely to be present. It is essential that within these envelopes, forest is protected from logging, roads, and other developments so that the ecological processes related to the establishment and subsequent use of fire refuges are maintained.",
keywords = "Australia, Disturbance ecology, Fire refuges, Forest management, Habitat fragmentation, High-severity fires, Landscape modeling, Model validation, Topography, Victorian Central Highlands, Wet montane forest",
author = "Berry, {Laurence E.} and Driscoll, {Don A.} and Stein, {John A.} and Wade Blanchard and Banks, {Sam C.} and Bradstock, {Ross A.} and Lindenmayer, {David B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1890/14-1699.1",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "2337--2348",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "8",

}

Berry, LE, Driscoll, DA, Stein, JA, Blanchard, W, Banks, SC, Bradstock, RA & Lindenmayer, DB 2015, 'Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems', Ecological Applications, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 2337-2348. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1699.1

Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems. / Berry, Laurence E.; Driscoll, Don A.; Stein, John A.; Blanchard, Wade; Banks, Sam C.; Bradstock, Ross A.; Lindenmayer, David B.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 25, No. 8, 01.12.2015, p. 2337-2348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems

AU - Berry, Laurence E.

AU - Driscoll, Don A.

AU - Stein, John A.

AU - Blanchard, Wade

AU - Banks, Sam C.

AU - Bradstock, Ross A.

AU - Lindenmayer, David B.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The increasing frequency of large, high-severity fires threatens the survival of old-growth specialist fauna in fire-prone forests. Within topographically diverse montane forests, areas that experience less severe or fewer fires compared with those prevailing in the landscape may present unique resource opportunities enabling old-growth specialist fauna to survive. Statistical landscape models that identify the extent and distribution of potential fire refuges may assist land managers to incorporate these areas into relevant biodiversity conservation strategies. We used a case study in an Australian wet montane forest to establish how predictive fire simulation models can be interpreted as management tools to identify potential fire refuges. We examined the relationship between the probability of fire refuge occurrence as predicted by an existing fire refuge model and fire severity experienced during a large wildfire. We also examined the extent to which local fire severity was influenced by fire severity in the surrounding landscape. We used a combination of statistical approaches, including generalized linear modeling, variogram analysis, and receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve analysis (ROC AUC). We found that the amount of unburned habitat and the factors influencing the retention and location of fire refuges varied with fire conditions. Under extreme fire conditions, the distribution of fire refuges was limited to only extremely sheltered, fire-resistant regions of the landscape. During extreme fire conditions, fire severity patterns were largely determined by stochastic factors that could not be predicted by the model. When fire conditions were moderate, physical landscape properties appeared to mediate fire severity distribution. Our study demonstrates that land managers can employ predictive landscape fire models to identify the broader climatic and spatial domain within which fire refuges are likely to be present. It is essential that within these envelopes, forest is protected from logging, roads, and other developments so that the ecological processes related to the establishment and subsequent use of fire refuges are maintained.

AB - The increasing frequency of large, high-severity fires threatens the survival of old-growth specialist fauna in fire-prone forests. Within topographically diverse montane forests, areas that experience less severe or fewer fires compared with those prevailing in the landscape may present unique resource opportunities enabling old-growth specialist fauna to survive. Statistical landscape models that identify the extent and distribution of potential fire refuges may assist land managers to incorporate these areas into relevant biodiversity conservation strategies. We used a case study in an Australian wet montane forest to establish how predictive fire simulation models can be interpreted as management tools to identify potential fire refuges. We examined the relationship between the probability of fire refuge occurrence as predicted by an existing fire refuge model and fire severity experienced during a large wildfire. We also examined the extent to which local fire severity was influenced by fire severity in the surrounding landscape. We used a combination of statistical approaches, including generalized linear modeling, variogram analysis, and receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve analysis (ROC AUC). We found that the amount of unburned habitat and the factors influencing the retention and location of fire refuges varied with fire conditions. Under extreme fire conditions, the distribution of fire refuges was limited to only extremely sheltered, fire-resistant regions of the landscape. During extreme fire conditions, fire severity patterns were largely determined by stochastic factors that could not be predicted by the model. When fire conditions were moderate, physical landscape properties appeared to mediate fire severity distribution. Our study demonstrates that land managers can employ predictive landscape fire models to identify the broader climatic and spatial domain within which fire refuges are likely to be present. It is essential that within these envelopes, forest is protected from logging, roads, and other developments so that the ecological processes related to the establishment and subsequent use of fire refuges are maintained.

KW - Australia

KW - Disturbance ecology

KW - Fire refuges

KW - Forest management

KW - Habitat fragmentation

KW - High-severity fires

KW - Landscape modeling

KW - Model validation

KW - Topography

KW - Victorian Central Highlands

KW - Wet montane forest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937727286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/14-1699.1

DO - 10.1890/14-1699.1

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 2337

EP - 2348

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 8

ER -

Berry LE, Driscoll DA, Stein JA, Blanchard W, Banks SC, Bradstock RA et al. Identifying the location of fire refuges in wet forest ecosystems. Ecological Applications. 2015 Dec 1;25(8):2337-2348. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1699.1