Identifying the perceived training needs for Australian pharmacist prescribers

Kreshnik Hoti, Jeffery Hughes, Bruce Sunderland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To explore pharmacists' perceived needs on training required to undertake an expanded prescribing role taking account of their years of registration, current professional practice area and preferred prescribing model.

Methods: A piloted self-administered questionnaire was distributed nationally to a random sample of pharmacists. Data were analysed using SPSS version18 software where data cross-tabulations, chi-squared and one-way analyses of variance were performed.

Key findings: A response rate of 40.4% (1049/2592) was achieved. Pathophysiology of conditions, principles of diagnosis, and patient assessment and monitoring were the most preferred training topics. There was no difference (P = 0.620) in pharmacists' perceived needs for additional training with respect to the model of prescribing (i.e. supplementary or independent or both) and years of registration as pharmacists (P = 0.284). However, consultant pharmacists were less supportive of the need for additional training (P = 0.013). Pharmacists' years of registration and professional practice influenced their training topic preferences. Supporters of an independent prescribing model only demonstrated a weaker preference for training in key therapeutic topics (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: This study provides information on key areas for consideration when training pharmacists for an expanded prescribing role. Although most pharmacists preferred a supplementary model of prescribing where doctors retain their diagnostic role, their strongest training preferences were for topics that provided pharmacists with further skills in patient diagnosis, assessment and monitoring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-46
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date10 Jan 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pharmacists
Monitoring
Professional Practice
Physiologic Monitoring
Consultants
Analysis of Variance
Software

Cite this

Hoti, Kreshnik ; Hughes, Jeffery ; Sunderland, Bruce. / Identifying the perceived training needs for Australian pharmacist prescribers. In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 38-46.
@article{f78cd0f3206f438caf29551522c44313,
title = "Identifying the perceived training needs for Australian pharmacist prescribers",
abstract = "Objective: To explore pharmacists' perceived needs on training required to undertake an expanded prescribing role taking account of their years of registration, current professional practice area and preferred prescribing model. Methods: A piloted self-administered questionnaire was distributed nationally to a random sample of pharmacists. Data were analysed using SPSS version18 software where data cross-tabulations, chi-squared and one-way analyses of variance were performed. Key findings: A response rate of 40.4{\%} (1049/2592) was achieved. Pathophysiology of conditions, principles of diagnosis, and patient assessment and monitoring were the most preferred training topics. There was no difference (P = 0.620) in pharmacists' perceived needs for additional training with respect to the model of prescribing (i.e. supplementary or independent or both) and years of registration as pharmacists (P = 0.284). However, consultant pharmacists were less supportive of the need for additional training (P = 0.013). Pharmacists' years of registration and professional practice influenced their training topic preferences. Supporters of an independent prescribing model only demonstrated a weaker preference for training in key therapeutic topics (P = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides information on key areas for consideration when training pharmacists for an expanded prescribing role. Although most pharmacists preferred a supplementary model of prescribing where doctors retain their diagnostic role, their strongest training preferences were for topics that provided pharmacists with further skills in patient diagnosis, assessment and monitoring.",
keywords = "Australian pharmacy, independent prescribing, pharmacist prescribing, pharmacist training, supplementary prescribing",
author = "Kreshnik Hoti and Jeffery Hughes and Bruce Sunderland",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/ijpp.12014",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "38--46",
journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0961-7671",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Identifying the perceived training needs for Australian pharmacist prescribers. / Hoti, Kreshnik; Hughes, Jeffery; Sunderland, Bruce.

In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 22, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 38-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying the perceived training needs for Australian pharmacist prescribers

AU - Hoti, Kreshnik

AU - Hughes, Jeffery

AU - Sunderland, Bruce

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objective: To explore pharmacists' perceived needs on training required to undertake an expanded prescribing role taking account of their years of registration, current professional practice area and preferred prescribing model. Methods: A piloted self-administered questionnaire was distributed nationally to a random sample of pharmacists. Data were analysed using SPSS version18 software where data cross-tabulations, chi-squared and one-way analyses of variance were performed. Key findings: A response rate of 40.4% (1049/2592) was achieved. Pathophysiology of conditions, principles of diagnosis, and patient assessment and monitoring were the most preferred training topics. There was no difference (P = 0.620) in pharmacists' perceived needs for additional training with respect to the model of prescribing (i.e. supplementary or independent or both) and years of registration as pharmacists (P = 0.284). However, consultant pharmacists were less supportive of the need for additional training (P = 0.013). Pharmacists' years of registration and professional practice influenced their training topic preferences. Supporters of an independent prescribing model only demonstrated a weaker preference for training in key therapeutic topics (P = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides information on key areas for consideration when training pharmacists for an expanded prescribing role. Although most pharmacists preferred a supplementary model of prescribing where doctors retain their diagnostic role, their strongest training preferences were for topics that provided pharmacists with further skills in patient diagnosis, assessment and monitoring.

AB - Objective: To explore pharmacists' perceived needs on training required to undertake an expanded prescribing role taking account of their years of registration, current professional practice area and preferred prescribing model. Methods: A piloted self-administered questionnaire was distributed nationally to a random sample of pharmacists. Data were analysed using SPSS version18 software where data cross-tabulations, chi-squared and one-way analyses of variance were performed. Key findings: A response rate of 40.4% (1049/2592) was achieved. Pathophysiology of conditions, principles of diagnosis, and patient assessment and monitoring were the most preferred training topics. There was no difference (P = 0.620) in pharmacists' perceived needs for additional training with respect to the model of prescribing (i.e. supplementary or independent or both) and years of registration as pharmacists (P = 0.284). However, consultant pharmacists were less supportive of the need for additional training (P = 0.013). Pharmacists' years of registration and professional practice influenced their training topic preferences. Supporters of an independent prescribing model only demonstrated a weaker preference for training in key therapeutic topics (P = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides information on key areas for consideration when training pharmacists for an expanded prescribing role. Although most pharmacists preferred a supplementary model of prescribing where doctors retain their diagnostic role, their strongest training preferences were for topics that provided pharmacists with further skills in patient diagnosis, assessment and monitoring.

KW - Australian pharmacy

KW - independent prescribing

KW - pharmacist prescribing

KW - pharmacist training

KW - supplementary prescribing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892378259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijpp.12014

DO - 10.1111/ijpp.12014

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 38

EP - 46

JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0961-7671

IS - 1

ER -