If robots R–US, who am I

Online ‘Christian’ responses to artificial intelligence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, I present responses to GRIN technologies drawn from Christian posts on the Internet, to answer the following research questions: 1. Which approach to imago Dei informs the online Christian response to artificial intelligence and artificial life (AI/AL)? and 2. To what extent does the preference for a particular approach emerge from a desire to construct the Self? Drawing upon Herzfeld (2002) discussion of AI and theological approaches to understanding the meaning of imago Dei, or humankind made in the image of God, it is shown that the Christian response to AI and AL is elaborated mostly through the functionalist and substantive approaches. It also largely constructs the GRN future as a Hell scenario. With reference to Bhabha's postcolonial model of ambivalence, it is argued that this response is motivated by a desire to regain control over the discursive construction of the Self, which for some, is challenged by AI and AL.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-160
Number of pages20
JournalCulture and Religion
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

artificial intelligence
robot
ambivalence
god
scenario
Internet
Robot
Artificial Intelligence
Imago Dei

Cite this

@article{817568e8d0644ff3a9b5fc939aa91e41,
title = "If robots R–US, who am I: Online ‘Christian’ responses to artificial intelligence",
abstract = "In this paper, I present responses to GRIN technologies drawn from Christian posts on the Internet, to answer the following research questions: 1. Which approach to imago Dei informs the online Christian response to artificial intelligence and artificial life (AI/AL)? and 2. To what extent does the preference for a particular approach emerge from a desire to construct the Self? Drawing upon Herzfeld (2002) discussion of AI and theological approaches to understanding the meaning of imago Dei, or humankind made in the image of God, it is shown that the Christian response to AI and AL is elaborated mostly through the functionalist and substantive approaches. It also largely constructs the GRN future as a Hell scenario. With reference to Bhabha's postcolonial model of ambivalence, it is argued that this response is motivated by a desire to regain control over the discursive construction of the Self, which for some, is challenged by AI and AL.",
author = "Laurence Tamatea",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14755610802211536",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "141--160",
journal = "Culture and Religion",
issn = "1475-5610",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

If robots R–US, who am I : Online ‘Christian’ responses to artificial intelligence. / Tamatea, Laurence.

In: Culture and Religion, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.07.2008, p. 141-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - If robots R–US, who am I

T2 - Online ‘Christian’ responses to artificial intelligence

AU - Tamatea, Laurence

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - In this paper, I present responses to GRIN technologies drawn from Christian posts on the Internet, to answer the following research questions: 1. Which approach to imago Dei informs the online Christian response to artificial intelligence and artificial life (AI/AL)? and 2. To what extent does the preference for a particular approach emerge from a desire to construct the Self? Drawing upon Herzfeld (2002) discussion of AI and theological approaches to understanding the meaning of imago Dei, or humankind made in the image of God, it is shown that the Christian response to AI and AL is elaborated mostly through the functionalist and substantive approaches. It also largely constructs the GRN future as a Hell scenario. With reference to Bhabha's postcolonial model of ambivalence, it is argued that this response is motivated by a desire to regain control over the discursive construction of the Self, which for some, is challenged by AI and AL.

AB - In this paper, I present responses to GRIN technologies drawn from Christian posts on the Internet, to answer the following research questions: 1. Which approach to imago Dei informs the online Christian response to artificial intelligence and artificial life (AI/AL)? and 2. To what extent does the preference for a particular approach emerge from a desire to construct the Self? Drawing upon Herzfeld (2002) discussion of AI and theological approaches to understanding the meaning of imago Dei, or humankind made in the image of God, it is shown that the Christian response to AI and AL is elaborated mostly through the functionalist and substantive approaches. It also largely constructs the GRN future as a Hell scenario. With reference to Bhabha's postcolonial model of ambivalence, it is argued that this response is motivated by a desire to regain control over the discursive construction of the Self, which for some, is challenged by AI and AL.

U2 - 10.1080/14755610802211536

DO - 10.1080/14755610802211536

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 141

EP - 160

JO - Culture and Religion

JF - Culture and Religion

SN - 1475-5610

IS - 2

ER -