Improving physiotherapy services to Indigenous children with physical disability

Are client perspectives missed in the continuous quality improvement approach?

Caroline Greenstein, Anne Lowell, David Thomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: To compare the outcomes of two cycles of continuous quality improvement (CQI) at a paediatric physiotherapy service with findings from interviews with clients and their carers using the service. 

    Design: Case study based at one paediatric physiotherapy service. 

    Setting: Community-based paediatric allied health service in Northern Australia. 

    Participants: Forty-nine clinical records and four staff at physiotherapy service, five Indigenous children with physical disability aged 8–21 years, and nine carers of Indigenous children aged 0–21 years (current or previous clients). 

    Interventions: The CQI process based on the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease involved a clinical audit; a workshop where clinicians assessed their health care systems, identified weaknesses and strengths, and developed goals and strategies for improvement; and reassessment through a second audit and workshop. Twelve open-ended, in-depth interviews were conducted with previous or current clients selected through purposive and theoretical sampling. CQI and interview results were then compared. 

    Main outcome measure: Comparison of findings from the two studies. 

    Results: Both CQI and interview results highlighted service delivery flexibility and therapists' knowledge, support and advocacy as service strengths, and lack of resources and a child-friendly office environment as weaknesses. However, the CQI results reported better communication and client input into the service than the interview results. 

    Conclusion: The CQI process, while demonstrating improvements in clinical and organisational aspects of the service, did not always reflect or address the primary concerns of Indigenous clients and underlined the importance of including clients in the CQI process.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)176-181
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

    Disabled Children
    Quality Improvement
    Interviews
    Pediatrics
    Caregivers
    Clinical Audit
    Education
    Practice Guidelines
    Health Services
    Chronic Disease
    Communication
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Delivery of Health Care

    Cite this

    @article{9cbb76247c5b48ca84daeb5ecc75b571,
    title = "Improving physiotherapy services to Indigenous children with physical disability: Are client perspectives missed in the continuous quality improvement approach?",
    abstract = "Objective: To compare the outcomes of two cycles of continuous quality improvement (CQI) at a paediatric physiotherapy service with findings from interviews with clients and their carers using the service. Design: Case study based at one paediatric physiotherapy service. Setting: Community-based paediatric allied health service in Northern Australia. Participants: Forty-nine clinical records and four staff at physiotherapy service, five Indigenous children with physical disability aged 8–21 years, and nine carers of Indigenous children aged 0–21 years (current or previous clients). Interventions: The CQI process based on the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease involved a clinical audit; a workshop where clinicians assessed their health care systems, identified weaknesses and strengths, and developed goals and strategies for improvement; and reassessment through a second audit and workshop. Twelve open-ended, in-depth interviews were conducted with previous or current clients selected through purposive and theoretical sampling. CQI and interview results were then compared. Main outcome measure: Comparison of findings from the two studies. Results: Both CQI and interview results highlighted service delivery flexibility and therapists' knowledge, support and advocacy as service strengths, and lack of resources and a child-friendly office environment as weaknesses. However, the CQI results reported better communication and client input into the service than the interview results. Conclusion: The CQI process, while demonstrating improvements in clinical and organisational aspects of the service, did not always reflect or address the primary concerns of Indigenous clients and underlined the importance of including clients in the CQI process.",
    keywords = "Aboriginal, allied health, Oceanic Ancestry Group, paediatric, physical therapy (specialty)",
    author = "Caroline Greenstein and Anne Lowell and David Thomas",
    year = "2016",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/ajr.12258",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "176--181",
    journal = "The Australian journal of rural health",
    issn = "1038-5282",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    Improving physiotherapy services to Indigenous children with physical disability : Are client perspectives missed in the continuous quality improvement approach? / Greenstein, Caroline; Lowell, Anne; Thomas, David.

    In: Australian Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 176-181.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Improving physiotherapy services to Indigenous children with physical disability

    T2 - Are client perspectives missed in the continuous quality improvement approach?

    AU - Greenstein, Caroline

    AU - Lowell, Anne

    AU - Thomas, David

    PY - 2016/6/1

    Y1 - 2016/6/1

    N2 - Objective: To compare the outcomes of two cycles of continuous quality improvement (CQI) at a paediatric physiotherapy service with findings from interviews with clients and their carers using the service. Design: Case study based at one paediatric physiotherapy service. Setting: Community-based paediatric allied health service in Northern Australia. Participants: Forty-nine clinical records and four staff at physiotherapy service, five Indigenous children with physical disability aged 8–21 years, and nine carers of Indigenous children aged 0–21 years (current or previous clients). Interventions: The CQI process based on the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease involved a clinical audit; a workshop where clinicians assessed their health care systems, identified weaknesses and strengths, and developed goals and strategies for improvement; and reassessment through a second audit and workshop. Twelve open-ended, in-depth interviews were conducted with previous or current clients selected through purposive and theoretical sampling. CQI and interview results were then compared. Main outcome measure: Comparison of findings from the two studies. Results: Both CQI and interview results highlighted service delivery flexibility and therapists' knowledge, support and advocacy as service strengths, and lack of resources and a child-friendly office environment as weaknesses. However, the CQI results reported better communication and client input into the service than the interview results. Conclusion: The CQI process, while demonstrating improvements in clinical and organisational aspects of the service, did not always reflect or address the primary concerns of Indigenous clients and underlined the importance of including clients in the CQI process.

    AB - Objective: To compare the outcomes of two cycles of continuous quality improvement (CQI) at a paediatric physiotherapy service with findings from interviews with clients and their carers using the service. Design: Case study based at one paediatric physiotherapy service. Setting: Community-based paediatric allied health service in Northern Australia. Participants: Forty-nine clinical records and four staff at physiotherapy service, five Indigenous children with physical disability aged 8–21 years, and nine carers of Indigenous children aged 0–21 years (current or previous clients). Interventions: The CQI process based on the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease involved a clinical audit; a workshop where clinicians assessed their health care systems, identified weaknesses and strengths, and developed goals and strategies for improvement; and reassessment through a second audit and workshop. Twelve open-ended, in-depth interviews were conducted with previous or current clients selected through purposive and theoretical sampling. CQI and interview results were then compared. Main outcome measure: Comparison of findings from the two studies. Results: Both CQI and interview results highlighted service delivery flexibility and therapists' knowledge, support and advocacy as service strengths, and lack of resources and a child-friendly office environment as weaknesses. However, the CQI results reported better communication and client input into the service than the interview results. Conclusion: The CQI process, while demonstrating improvements in clinical and organisational aspects of the service, did not always reflect or address the primary concerns of Indigenous clients and underlined the importance of including clients in the CQI process.

    KW - Aboriginal

    KW - allied health

    KW - Oceanic Ancestry Group

    KW - paediatric

    KW - physical therapy (specialty)

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028235940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/ajr.12258

    DO - 10.1111/ajr.12258

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 176

    EP - 181

    JO - The Australian journal of rural health

    JF - The Australian journal of rural health

    SN - 1038-5282

    IS - 3

    ER -