Abstract
Many species have adapted successfully to traditionally cultivated agricultural environments but, as production systems are intensified, this adaptation is reaching its limits. Conflicting facets of sustainability compound the problem. Here we describe how reductions in the use of water in rice fields is compromising the persistence of the largest known breeding population of the Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus), a globally endangered waterbird. In fields with traditional, early permanent water, bitterns began nesting around 77 days after inundation, with 65% of nests having sufficient time for all chicks to fledge before harvest. Our breeding success model showed that all nests could potentially be successful if permanent water was applied by early November, with a ponding period – the phase when fields are flooded – of at least 149 days. The modelling suggests that successful bittern breeding was unlikely where rice was grown using new water-saving methods – drill-sown and delayed permanent water – because the ponding period is too short. These methods have become the rice industry standard in Australia, rising from 34% of fields in 2014 to 91% in 2020. While this saved 1.5–4.5 megalitres/ha per year, it has undermined the habitat value of these agricultural wetlands. ‘Bittern-friendly’ rice growing incentives could encourage timely nesting and maximise breeding success. Early and sufficient ponding can be complemented by establishing adjacent wetland habitat refuges, maintaining grassy banks, and creating dedicated patches to fast-track nesting. Increasing water-use efficiency in agro-ecosystems is widely touted as being beneficial to the environment, but our research demonstrates the urgent need to manage trade-offs with biodiversity conservation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 107638 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment |
Volume | 322 |
Early online date | 30 Aug 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Without the support and participation of rice farmers, this study would not have been possible. The Bitterns in Rice Project Committee was also central, particularly Neil Bull (Ricegrowers? Association of Australia), Anna Wilson (Riverina Local Land Services), Andrew Silcocks (Birdlife Australia), and Mark Robb (Coleambally Irrigation). Jessica Herring, Nathan Smith, Peter Irish and Beau Herring assisted with the surveys. The field work was supported by Riverina Local Land Services through funding from the Australian Government's National Landcare Programme, and this research was supported by funding from the Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) through the Threatened Species Recovery Hub. Additional funding and support were provided by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Norman Wettenhall Foundation, Murray Local Land Services, Murrumbidgee Irrigation, Murrumbidgee Landcare and Murrumbidgee Field Naturalists? Club. The lead author was also funded through an Australian Postgraduate Award from Charles Darwin University. Thanks to Leigh Vial, Mark Groat and Troy Mauger for providing valuable agronomy insights and comments on a draft, and to Mark Stratford for help preparing the map. We also thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive suggestions and encouraging comments.
Funding Information:
Without the support and participation of rice farmers, this study would not have been possible. The Bitterns in Rice Project Committee was also central, particularly Neil Bull (Ricegrowers’ Association of Australia), Anna Wilson (Riverina Local Land Services), Andrew Silcocks (Birdlife Australia), and Mark Robb (Coleambally Irrigation). Jessica Herring, Nathan Smith, Peter Irish and Beau Herring assisted with the surveys. The field work was supported by Riverina Local Land Services through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Programme , and this research was supported by funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) through the Threatened Species Recovery Hub. Additional funding and support were provided by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation , Norman Wettenhall Foundation , Murray Local Land Services , Murrumbidgee Irrigation , Murrumbidgee Landcare and Murrumbidgee Field Naturalists’ Club . The lead author was also funded through an Australian Postgraduate Award from Charles Darwin University . Thanks to Leigh Vial, Mark Groat and Troy Mauger for providing valuable agronomy insights and comments on a draft, and to Mark Stratford for help preparing the map. We also thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive suggestions and encouraging comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.