Abstract
The contribution of urban greenspaces to support biodiversity and provide benefits for people is increasingly recognized. However, ongoing management practices favor vegetation oversimplification, often limiting greenspaces to lawns and tree canopy rather than multi-layered vegetation that includes under- and midstorey, and the use of nonnative species. These practices hinder the potential of greenspaces to sustain indigenous biodiversity, particularly for taxa like insects that rely on plants for food and habitat. Yet, little is known about which plant species may maximize positive outcomes for taxonomically and functionally diverse insect communities in greenspaces. Additionally, while cities are expected to experience high rates of introductions, quantitative assessments of the relative occupancy of indigenous vs. introduced insect species in greenspace are rare, hindering understanding of how management may promote indigenous biodiversity while limiting the establishment of introduced insects. Using a hierarchically replicated study design across 15 public parks, we recorded occurrence data from 552 insect species on 133 plant species, differing in planting design element (lawn, midstorey, and tree canopy), midstorey growth form (forbs, lilioids, graminoids, and shrubs) and origin (nonnative, native, and indigenous), to assess (1) the relative contributions of indigenous and introduced insect species and (2) which plant species sustained the highest number of indigenous insects. We found that the insect community was overwhelmingly composed of indigenous rather than introduced species. Our findings further highlight the core role of multi-layered vegetation in sustaining high insect biodiversity in urban areas, with indigenous midstorey and canopy representing key elements to maintain rich and functionally diverse indigenous insect communities. Intriguingly, graminoids supported the highest indigenous insect richness across all studied growth forms by plant origin groups. Our work highlights the opportunity presented by indigenous understory and midstorey plants, particularly indigenous graminoids, in our study area to promote indigenous insect biodiversity in urban greenspaces. Our study provides a blueprint and stimulus for architects, engineers, developers, designers, and planners to incorporate into their practice plant species palettes that foster a larger presence of indigenous over regionally native or nonnative plant species, while incorporating a broader mixture of midstorey growth forms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e02309 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Ecological Applications |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 19 Feb 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors would like to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the land and waterways on which this research took place, the Woi wurrung and Boon wurrung peoples of the eastern Kulin Nations. We pay our respects to their Elders, past, present, and emerging. This study was funded by the City of Melbourne; thanks to Amy Rogers, Lingna Zhang, and other colleagues from the Urban Sustainability Branch for their support and enthusiasm. We would also like to acknowledge funding from RMIT University’s Strategic Projects in Urban Research (SPUR) Fund, the National Environmental Science Programme—Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub (NESP‐CAUL), and the Australian Research Council ‐ Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED). A. Morán‐Ordóñez was funded by the Spanish Government (IJCI‐2016‐30349). Thanks to Adam Ślipiński, Ascelin Gordon, David Heathcote, Dayanthi Nugegoda, Flickr community, Westgate Biodiversity: Bili Nursery & Landcare, Jeff Shimeta, Laura Stark, Marc Kéry, Michelle Freeman, Rolf Oberprieler, Royal Park managers, Shannon Fernand’s, Timothy New, and Xavier Francoeur for their invaluable contributions to the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the Ecological Society of America
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.