Indigenous protected areas in Sea Country

Indigenous-driven collaborative marine protected areas in Australia

Phil Rist, Whitney Rassip, Djalinda Yunupingu, Jonathan Wearne, Jackie Gould, Melanie Dulfer-Hyams, Ellie Bock, Dermot Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

1. In many parts of the world, policymakers, legislators, marine managers, and indigenous peoples have attempted to reconcile marine protected area (MPA) governance and management with indigenous peoples' ancient and ongoing traditional ownership of coastal and marine environments. This paper describes a novel approach in Australia to addressing this challenge through indigenous‐led planning and collaborative governance of holistic coastal land and sea indigenous protected areas (IPAs) based on the indigenous concept of “Country”—traditional land and sea estates and their associated cultural, environmental, and other values.
2. To provide context to this approach, the paper explains the concept of “Sea
Country” and provides an overview of the relationship between indigenous peoples and Australia's coastal and marine environments, the legal and policy recognition of Indigenous Sea Country rights and interests, and the engagement of indigenous people in the governance and management of government‐led, legislated MPAs in Australia.
3. The paper then describes the evolution of IPAs from being specifically based on indigenous land tenure to being based more generally on Indigenous Country,
across multiple tenures, including marine areas. In recent years, IPAs based on
Country have enabled indigenous people to lead planning and governance of land and sea areas over which they have limited legal rights, including over existing national parks and marine parks. Using this approach, some IPAs complement existing protected area governance and management arrangements, whereas elsewhere Country‐based IPAs are adding significantly to Australia's MPA estate. The Dhimurru IPA in the Northern Territory and Girringun Region IPAs in Queensland are presented as examples of this Country‐based approach.
4. This indigenous‐driven, collaborative, nonlegislative approach to dedicating,
governing and managing coastal areas and MPAs may serve as a model in other
nation states for indigenous people wishing to use a protected area governance
framework to support the contemporary management of their traditional marine
and coastal estates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-151
Number of pages14
JournalAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Volume29
Issue numberS2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

protected area
conservation areas
indigenous peoples
governance
marine environment
coastal zone
legal rights
sea
planning
land tenure
Northern Territory
marine park
ownership
Queensland
national parks
complement
managers
national park

Cite this

Rist, Phil ; Rassip, Whitney ; Yunupingu, Djalinda ; Wearne, Jonathan ; Gould, Jackie ; Dulfer-Hyams, Melanie ; Bock, Ellie ; Smyth, Dermot. / Indigenous protected areas in Sea Country : Indigenous-driven collaborative marine protected areas in Australia. In: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 2019 ; Vol. 29, No. S2. pp. 138-151.
@article{2337f3114d5648f58e8ab61828941139,
title = "Indigenous protected areas in Sea Country: Indigenous-driven collaborative marine protected areas in Australia",
abstract = "1. In many parts of the world, policymakers, legislators, marine managers, and indigenous peoples have attempted to reconcile marine protected area (MPA) governance and management with indigenous peoples' ancient and ongoing traditional ownership of coastal and marine environments. This paper describes a novel approach in Australia to addressing this challenge through indigenous‐led planning and collaborative governance of holistic coastal land and sea indigenous protected areas (IPAs) based on the indigenous concept of “Country”—traditional land and sea estates and their associated cultural, environmental, and other values.2. To provide context to this approach, the paper explains the concept of “SeaCountry” and provides an overview of the relationship between indigenous peoples and Australia's coastal and marine environments, the legal and policy recognition of Indigenous Sea Country rights and interests, and the engagement of indigenous people in the governance and management of government‐led, legislated MPAs in Australia.3. The paper then describes the evolution of IPAs from being specifically based on indigenous land tenure to being based more generally on Indigenous Country,across multiple tenures, including marine areas. In recent years, IPAs based onCountry have enabled indigenous people to lead planning and governance of land and sea areas over which they have limited legal rights, including over existing national parks and marine parks. Using this approach, some IPAs complement existing protected area governance and management arrangements, whereas elsewhere Country‐based IPAs are adding significantly to Australia's MPA estate. The Dhimurru IPA in the Northern Territory and Girringun Region IPAs in Queensland are presented as examples of this Country‐based approach.4. This indigenous‐driven, collaborative, nonlegislative approach to dedicating,governing and managing coastal areas and MPAs may serve as a model in othernation states for indigenous people wishing to use a protected area governanceframework to support the contemporary management of their traditional marineand coastal estates.",
keywords = "Australia, collaborative governance, indigenous, marine planning, marine protected areas, sea country",
author = "Phil Rist and Whitney Rassip and Djalinda Yunupingu and Jonathan Wearne and Jackie Gould and Melanie Dulfer-Hyams and Ellie Bock and Dermot Smyth",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1002/aqc.3052",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "138--151",
journal = "Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems",
issn = "1052-7613",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "S2",

}

Indigenous protected areas in Sea Country : Indigenous-driven collaborative marine protected areas in Australia. / Rist, Phil; Rassip, Whitney; Yunupingu, Djalinda; Wearne, Jonathan; Gould, Jackie; Dulfer-Hyams, Melanie; Bock, Ellie; Smyth, Dermot.

In: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, Vol. 29, No. S2, 21.10.2019, p. 138-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indigenous protected areas in Sea Country

T2 - Indigenous-driven collaborative marine protected areas in Australia

AU - Rist, Phil

AU - Rassip, Whitney

AU - Yunupingu, Djalinda

AU - Wearne, Jonathan

AU - Gould, Jackie

AU - Dulfer-Hyams, Melanie

AU - Bock, Ellie

AU - Smyth, Dermot

PY - 2019/10/21

Y1 - 2019/10/21

N2 - 1. In many parts of the world, policymakers, legislators, marine managers, and indigenous peoples have attempted to reconcile marine protected area (MPA) governance and management with indigenous peoples' ancient and ongoing traditional ownership of coastal and marine environments. This paper describes a novel approach in Australia to addressing this challenge through indigenous‐led planning and collaborative governance of holistic coastal land and sea indigenous protected areas (IPAs) based on the indigenous concept of “Country”—traditional land and sea estates and their associated cultural, environmental, and other values.2. To provide context to this approach, the paper explains the concept of “SeaCountry” and provides an overview of the relationship between indigenous peoples and Australia's coastal and marine environments, the legal and policy recognition of Indigenous Sea Country rights and interests, and the engagement of indigenous people in the governance and management of government‐led, legislated MPAs in Australia.3. The paper then describes the evolution of IPAs from being specifically based on indigenous land tenure to being based more generally on Indigenous Country,across multiple tenures, including marine areas. In recent years, IPAs based onCountry have enabled indigenous people to lead planning and governance of land and sea areas over which they have limited legal rights, including over existing national parks and marine parks. Using this approach, some IPAs complement existing protected area governance and management arrangements, whereas elsewhere Country‐based IPAs are adding significantly to Australia's MPA estate. The Dhimurru IPA in the Northern Territory and Girringun Region IPAs in Queensland are presented as examples of this Country‐based approach.4. This indigenous‐driven, collaborative, nonlegislative approach to dedicating,governing and managing coastal areas and MPAs may serve as a model in othernation states for indigenous people wishing to use a protected area governanceframework to support the contemporary management of their traditional marineand coastal estates.

AB - 1. In many parts of the world, policymakers, legislators, marine managers, and indigenous peoples have attempted to reconcile marine protected area (MPA) governance and management with indigenous peoples' ancient and ongoing traditional ownership of coastal and marine environments. This paper describes a novel approach in Australia to addressing this challenge through indigenous‐led planning and collaborative governance of holistic coastal land and sea indigenous protected areas (IPAs) based on the indigenous concept of “Country”—traditional land and sea estates and their associated cultural, environmental, and other values.2. To provide context to this approach, the paper explains the concept of “SeaCountry” and provides an overview of the relationship between indigenous peoples and Australia's coastal and marine environments, the legal and policy recognition of Indigenous Sea Country rights and interests, and the engagement of indigenous people in the governance and management of government‐led, legislated MPAs in Australia.3. The paper then describes the evolution of IPAs from being specifically based on indigenous land tenure to being based more generally on Indigenous Country,across multiple tenures, including marine areas. In recent years, IPAs based onCountry have enabled indigenous people to lead planning and governance of land and sea areas over which they have limited legal rights, including over existing national parks and marine parks. Using this approach, some IPAs complement existing protected area governance and management arrangements, whereas elsewhere Country‐based IPAs are adding significantly to Australia's MPA estate. The Dhimurru IPA in the Northern Territory and Girringun Region IPAs in Queensland are presented as examples of this Country‐based approach.4. This indigenous‐driven, collaborative, nonlegislative approach to dedicating,governing and managing coastal areas and MPAs may serve as a model in othernation states for indigenous people wishing to use a protected area governanceframework to support the contemporary management of their traditional marineand coastal estates.

KW - Australia

KW - collaborative governance

KW - indigenous

KW - marine planning

KW - marine protected areas

KW - sea country

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073690264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/aqc.3052

DO - 10.1002/aqc.3052

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 138

EP - 151

JO - Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

JF - Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

SN - 1052-7613

IS - S2

ER -