Influence of modifications (from AoB2015 to v0.5) in the Vegetation Optimality Model

Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, Stanislaus J. Schymanski

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The Vegetation Optimality Model VOM,Currency sign is an optimality-based, coupled water-vegetation model that predicts vegetation properties and behaviour based on optimality theory rather than calibrating vegetation properties or prescribing them based on observations, as most conventional models do. Several updates to previous applications of the VOM have been made for the study in the accompanying paper of , where we assess whether optimality theory can alleviate common shortcomings of conventional models, as identified in a previous model inter-comparison study along the North Australian Tropical Transect NATT,Currency sign. Therefore, we assess in this technical paper how the updates to the model and input data would have affected the original results of , and we implemented these changes one at a time. The model updates included extended input data, the use of variable atmospheric CO2 levels, modified soil properties, implementation of free drainage conditions, and the addition of grass rooting depths to the optimized vegetation properties. A systematic assessment of these changes was carried out by adding each individual modification to the original version of the VOM at the flux tower site of Howard Springs, Australia. The analysis revealed that the implemented changes affected the simulation of mean annual evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP) by no more than 20g%, with the largest effects caused by the newly imposed free drainage conditions and modified soil texture. Free drainage conditions led to an underestimation of ET and GPP in comparison with the results of , whereas more fine-grained soil textures increased the water storage in the soil and resulted in increased GPP. Although part of the effect of free drainage was compensated for by the updated soil texture, when combining all changes, the resulting effect on the simulated fluxes was still dominated by the effect of implementing free drainage conditions. Eventually, the relative error for the mean annual ET, in comparison with flux tower observations, changed from an 8.4g% overestimation to an 10.2g% underestimation, whereas the relative errors for the mean annual GPP remained similar, with an overestimation that slightly reduced from 17.8g% to 14.7g%. The sensitivity to free drainage conditions suggests that a realistic representation of groundwater dynamics is very important for predicting ET and GPP at a tropical open-forest savanna site as investigated here. The modest changes in model outputs highlighted the robustness of the optimization approach that is central to the VOM architecture.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)883-900
    Number of pages18
    JournalGeoscientific Model Development
    Volume15
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of modifications (from AoB2015 to v0.5) in the Vegetation Optimality Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this