TY - JOUR
T1 - Innovative models of healthcare delivery
T2 - An umbrella review of reviews
AU - Roberts, Natalie
AU - Carrigan, Ann
AU - Clay-Williams, Robyn
AU - Hibbert, Peter D.
AU - Mahmoud, Zeyad
AU - Pomare, Chiara
AU - Fajardo Pulido, Diana
AU - Meulenbroeks, Isabelle
AU - Knaggs, Gilbert Thomas
AU - Austin, Elizabeth E.
AU - Churruca, Kate
AU - Ellis, Louise A.
AU - Long, Janet C.
AU - Hutchinson, Karen
AU - Best, Stephanie
AU - Nic Giolla Easpaig, Brona
AU - Sarkies, Mitchell N.
AU - Francis Auton, Emilie
AU - Hatem, Sarah
AU - Dammery, Genevieve
AU - Nguyen, Mai Tran
AU - Nguyen, Hoa Mi
AU - Arnolda, Gaston
AU - Rapport, Frances
AU - Zurynski, Yvonne
AU - Maka, Katherine
AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded by Health Infrastructure NSW under the grant HI20314.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/2/23
Y1 - 2023/2/23
N2 - Objective To undertake a synthesis of evidence-based research for seven innovative models of care to inform the development of new hospitals. Design Umbrella review. Setting Interventions delivered inside and outside of acute care settings. Participants Children and adults with one or more identified acute or chronic health conditions. Data sources PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE and CINAHL. Primary and secondary outcome measures Clinical indicators and mortality, healthcare utilisation, quality of life, self-management and self-care and patient knowledge. Results A total of 66 reviews were included, synthesising evidence from 1272 primary studies across the 7 models of care. Virtual care was the most common model studied, addressed by 47 (73%) of the reviews. Common outcomes evaluated across reviews were clinical indicators and mortality, healthcare utilisation, self-care and self-management, patient knowledge, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. The findings indicate that the innovative models of healthcare we identified in this review may be effective in managing patients with a range of acute and chronic conditions. Most of the included reviews reported evidence of comparable or improved care. Conclusions A consideration of local infrastructure and individual patient characteristics, such as health literacy, may be critical in determining the suitability of models of care for patients and their implementation in local health systems. Trial registration number 10.17605/OSF.IO/PS6ZU.
AB - Objective To undertake a synthesis of evidence-based research for seven innovative models of care to inform the development of new hospitals. Design Umbrella review. Setting Interventions delivered inside and outside of acute care settings. Participants Children and adults with one or more identified acute or chronic health conditions. Data sources PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE and CINAHL. Primary and secondary outcome measures Clinical indicators and mortality, healthcare utilisation, quality of life, self-management and self-care and patient knowledge. Results A total of 66 reviews were included, synthesising evidence from 1272 primary studies across the 7 models of care. Virtual care was the most common model studied, addressed by 47 (73%) of the reviews. Common outcomes evaluated across reviews were clinical indicators and mortality, healthcare utilisation, self-care and self-management, patient knowledge, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. The findings indicate that the innovative models of healthcare we identified in this review may be effective in managing patients with a range of acute and chronic conditions. Most of the included reviews reported evidence of comparable or improved care. Conclusions A consideration of local infrastructure and individual patient characteristics, such as health literacy, may be critical in determining the suitability of models of care for patients and their implementation in local health systems. Trial registration number 10.17605/OSF.IO/PS6ZU.
KW - dialysis
KW - heart failure
KW - public health
KW - telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148824803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066270
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066270
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148824803
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 13
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 2
M1 - e066270
ER -