Institutional logics

reconceptualising ‘public providers’ in post-open market technical and vocational education and training

Don Zoellner

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In a number of advanced market democracies the role of public technical and vocational education and training institutions has been called into question. This is one result of a singular dominant public policy discourse favouring the provision of public services through contracting out in competitive markets. With the limitations of this default policy setting becoming increasingly apparent there is an opportunity to identify a new narrative to facilitate a transition to a less contestable training market environment. In particular, the rationale and justification for the direct public provision of vocational education through government-owned and operated institutions can be re-examined in non-market terms. However, the deep penetration of the reductionist and simplistic pro-choice competitive ideation into current policy environments has resulted in a limited, often dualistic, range of conceptual options being used by analysts. This article investigates alternative concepts before settling on the use of institutional logics to articulate the multiple contributions to the provision of the skills and knowledge made by publicly-owned institutions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-21
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Vocational Education and Training
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 May 2019

    Fingerprint

    technical education
    vocational education
    Vocational Education
    market
    settling
    public service
    public policy
    democracy
    narrative
    discourse

    Cite this

    @article{16f61341be6b4a1dba8ffa33a741089b,
    title = "Institutional logics: reconceptualising ‘public providers’ in post-open market technical and vocational education and training",
    abstract = "In a number of advanced market democracies the role of public technical and vocational education and training institutions has been called into question. This is one result of a singular dominant public policy discourse favouring the provision of public services through contracting out in competitive markets. With the limitations of this default policy setting becoming increasingly apparent there is an opportunity to identify a new narrative to facilitate a transition to a less contestable training market environment. In particular, the rationale and justification for the direct public provision of vocational education through government-owned and operated institutions can be re-examined in non-market terms. However, the deep penetration of the reductionist and simplistic pro-choice competitive ideation into current policy environments has resulted in a limited, often dualistic, range of conceptual options being used by analysts. This article investigates alternative concepts before settling on the use of institutional logics to articulate the multiple contributions to the provision of the skills and knowledge made by publicly-owned institutions.",
    keywords = "dualism, Institutional logic, market, public institution, technical and vocational education and training",
    author = "Don Zoellner",
    year = "2019",
    month = "5",
    day = "26",
    doi = "10.1080/13636820.2019.1623295",
    language = "English",
    pages = "1--21",
    journal = "Journal of Vocational Education and Training",
    issn = "1363-6820",
    publisher = "Routledge",

    }

    Institutional logics : reconceptualising ‘public providers’ in post-open market technical and vocational education and training. / Zoellner, Don.

    In: Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 26.05.2019, p. 1-21.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Institutional logics

    T2 - reconceptualising ‘public providers’ in post-open market technical and vocational education and training

    AU - Zoellner, Don

    PY - 2019/5/26

    Y1 - 2019/5/26

    N2 - In a number of advanced market democracies the role of public technical and vocational education and training institutions has been called into question. This is one result of a singular dominant public policy discourse favouring the provision of public services through contracting out in competitive markets. With the limitations of this default policy setting becoming increasingly apparent there is an opportunity to identify a new narrative to facilitate a transition to a less contestable training market environment. In particular, the rationale and justification for the direct public provision of vocational education through government-owned and operated institutions can be re-examined in non-market terms. However, the deep penetration of the reductionist and simplistic pro-choice competitive ideation into current policy environments has resulted in a limited, often dualistic, range of conceptual options being used by analysts. This article investigates alternative concepts before settling on the use of institutional logics to articulate the multiple contributions to the provision of the skills and knowledge made by publicly-owned institutions.

    AB - In a number of advanced market democracies the role of public technical and vocational education and training institutions has been called into question. This is one result of a singular dominant public policy discourse favouring the provision of public services through contracting out in competitive markets. With the limitations of this default policy setting becoming increasingly apparent there is an opportunity to identify a new narrative to facilitate a transition to a less contestable training market environment. In particular, the rationale and justification for the direct public provision of vocational education through government-owned and operated institutions can be re-examined in non-market terms. However, the deep penetration of the reductionist and simplistic pro-choice competitive ideation into current policy environments has resulted in a limited, often dualistic, range of conceptual options being used by analysts. This article investigates alternative concepts before settling on the use of institutional logics to articulate the multiple contributions to the provision of the skills and knowledge made by publicly-owned institutions.

    KW - dualism

    KW - Institutional logic

    KW - market

    KW - public institution

    KW - technical and vocational education and training

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066271524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/13636820.2019.1623295

    DO - 10.1080/13636820.2019.1623295

    M3 - Article

    SP - 1

    EP - 21

    JO - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

    JF - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

    SN - 1363-6820

    ER -