TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated Measures of Indigenous Land and Sea Management Effectiveness
T2 - Challenges and Opportunities for Improved Conservation Partnerships in Australia
AU - Austin, Beau
AU - Robinson, Catherine
AU - Fitzsimons, James
AU - Sandford, Marcus
AU - Ens, Emilie
AU - Macdonald, Jennifer
AU - Hockings, Marc
AU - Hinchley, David
AU - McDonald, Fergus
AU - Corrigan, Colleen
AU - Kennett, Rod
AU - Hunter-Xenie, Hmalan
AU - Garnett, Stephen
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - As partnerships between Indigenous peoples and conservation practitioners mature, new methods are being sought to assess their effectiveness. The increasing diversity of income sources mobilised by Indigenous land and sea managers in Australia is intensifying the pressures on them to demonstrate their 'effectiveness' through a range of frameworks, tools and criteria. In this review, we use Indigenous land and sea management in Australia as a lens to explore the politics and practicalities of measuring the effectiveness of Indigenous conservation partnerships. We first outline current approaches to measuring effectiveness, followed by an explanation of some of the challenges. Available literature is then supplemented with the collective knowledge and experience of the authors to identify practical and achievable ways forward. We suggest four ways by which Indigenous groups and institutional investors can work together to establish meaningful criteria for ensuring effective conservation outcomes: i) develop new mutually-agreed definitions; ii) embrace the complexity of Indigenous-conservation alliances, iii) reflect regularly and collaboratively, and iv) negotiate which indicators of effectiveness can be aggregated across large scales. Well-executed evaluations of effectiveness can be powerful tools for enhancing conservation that conforms to local Indigenous values, facilitates adaptive management, and strengthens relationships between investors and Indigenous groups. By focusing on principles, process, flexibility and trust, generative 'good faith' approaches have the potential to support win-win outcomes for people and the environment and contribute significantly to global conservation and sustainability targets.
AB - As partnerships between Indigenous peoples and conservation practitioners mature, new methods are being sought to assess their effectiveness. The increasing diversity of income sources mobilised by Indigenous land and sea managers in Australia is intensifying the pressures on them to demonstrate their 'effectiveness' through a range of frameworks, tools and criteria. In this review, we use Indigenous land and sea management in Australia as a lens to explore the politics and practicalities of measuring the effectiveness of Indigenous conservation partnerships. We first outline current approaches to measuring effectiveness, followed by an explanation of some of the challenges. Available literature is then supplemented with the collective knowledge and experience of the authors to identify practical and achievable ways forward. We suggest four ways by which Indigenous groups and institutional investors can work together to establish meaningful criteria for ensuring effective conservation outcomes: i) develop new mutually-agreed definitions; ii) embrace the complexity of Indigenous-conservation alliances, iii) reflect regularly and collaboratively, and iv) negotiate which indicators of effectiveness can be aggregated across large scales. Well-executed evaluations of effectiveness can be powerful tools for enhancing conservation that conforms to local Indigenous values, facilitates adaptive management, and strengthens relationships between investors and Indigenous groups. By focusing on principles, process, flexibility and trust, generative 'good faith' approaches have the potential to support win-win outcomes for people and the environment and contribute significantly to global conservation and sustainability targets.
KW - conservation
KW - evaluation
KW - impact investing
KW - Indigenous peoples
KW - monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049845655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/cs.cs_16_123
DO - 10.4103/cs.cs_16_123
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85049845655
SN - 0972-4923
VL - 16
SP - 372
EP - 384
JO - Conservation and Society
JF - Conservation and Society
IS - 3
ER -