Is Gastric Banding Appropriate in Indigenous Or Remote-Dwelling Persons?

P. John Treacy, Mark D. Chatfield, Justin Bessell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background: Gastric banding has been promoted as less suitable for indigenous persons or persons who live remotely as it requires in person follow-up for band adjustment and may have higher rates of reoperation. This study assessed being an indigenous Australian or living remotely (but not both) on outcomes following gastric banding.

    Methods: Data was prospectively recorded on all 559 patients who underwent gastric banding by one surgeon at one private hospital in Darwin, between February 1998 and August 2014.

    Results: Forty persons (7 %) were indigenous and 93 (17 %) were remotely living (only 7 were both). At the last assessment (follow-up 37 (SD 31) months), overall percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) was 53 % (30 %), the percentage of total weight loss (TWL) was 23 (13), and 389 (70 %) achieved >50 % EWL. Seventy-two percent (43/60) ceased all diabetic medications. Ninety-two (17 %) came to reoperation. There was little difference between the indigenous and non-indigenous metropolitan-living groups, or between the remote and metropolitan non-indigenous groups in %EWL, %TWL, the proportion who achieved more than 50 % EWL, the time to achieve the goal weight, or cessation of diabetes medication. Similarly, there was little difference in the time to band removal or replacement. No person was directly compromised at band removal/replacement by delay due to dwelling remotely.

    Conclusions: In these select persons who underwent gastric banding in the private sector only, outcomes of weight loss and revisional surgery were acceptable and comparable between indigenous and non-indigenous metropolitan-dwelling persons as well as between remote and metropolitan-dwelling non-indigenous persons.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1728-1734
    Number of pages7
    JournalObesity Surgery
    Volume26
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

      Fingerprint

    Cite this