Knowing but not doing

Selecting priority conservation areas and the research�implementation gap

Andrew Knight, Richard Cowling, M Rouget, A Balmford, Amanda Lombard, Bruce Campbell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Conservation assessment is a rapidly evolving discipline whose stated goal is the design of networks of protected areas that represent and ensure the persistence of nature (i.e., species, habitats, and environmental processes) by separating priority areas from the activities that degrade or destroy them. Nevertheless, despite a burgeoning scientific literature that ever refines these techniques for allocating conservation resources, it is widely believed that conservation assessments are rarely translated into actions that actually conserve nature. We reviewed the conservation assessment literature in peer-reviewed journals and conducted survey questionnaires of the authors of these studies. Two-thirds of conservation assessments published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature do not deliver conservation action, primarily because most researchers never plan for implementation. This research-implementation gap between conservation science and real-world action is a genuine phenomenon and is a specific example of the "knowing-doing gap" that is widely recognized in management science. Given the woefully inadequate resources allocated for conservation, our findings raise questions over the utility of conservation assessment science, as currently practiced, to provide useful, pragmatic solutions to conservation planning problems. A reevaluation of the conceptual and operational basis of conservation planning research is urgently required. We recommend the following actions for beginning a process for bridging the research-implementation gap in conservation planning: (1) acknowledge the research-implementation gap is real, (2) source research questions from practitioners, (3) situate research within a broader conservation planning model, (4) expand the social dimension of conservation assessments, (5) support conservation plans with transdisciplinary social learning institutions, (6) reward academics for societal engagement and implementation, and (7) train students in skills for "doing" conservation. � 2008 Society for Conservation Biology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)610-617
    Number of pages8
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume22
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    protected area
    conservation areas
    planning
    peers
    natural resources conservation
    conservation planning
    research planning
    students
    questionnaires
    learning
    researchers
    Biological Sciences
    habitats
    questionnaire survey
    train
    student
    persistence
    methodology
    habitat
    resource

    Cite this

    Knight, A., Cowling, R., Rouget, M., Balmford, A., Lombard, A., & Campbell, B. (2008). Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research�implementation gap. Conservation Biology, 22(3), 610-617.
    Knight, Andrew ; Cowling, Richard ; Rouget, M ; Balmford, A ; Lombard, Amanda ; Campbell, Bruce. / Knowing but not doing : Selecting priority conservation areas and the research�implementation gap. In: Conservation Biology. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 610-617.
    @article{241c8ca9d32d4918be9d16efa616d858,
    title = "Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research{\"i}¿½implementation gap",
    abstract = "Conservation assessment is a rapidly evolving discipline whose stated goal is the design of networks of protected areas that represent and ensure the persistence of nature (i.e., species, habitats, and environmental processes) by separating priority areas from the activities that degrade or destroy them. Nevertheless, despite a burgeoning scientific literature that ever refines these techniques for allocating conservation resources, it is widely believed that conservation assessments are rarely translated into actions that actually conserve nature. We reviewed the conservation assessment literature in peer-reviewed journals and conducted survey questionnaires of the authors of these studies. Two-thirds of conservation assessments published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature do not deliver conservation action, primarily because most researchers never plan for implementation. This research-implementation gap between conservation science and real-world action is a genuine phenomenon and is a specific example of the {"}knowing-doing gap{"} that is widely recognized in management science. Given the woefully inadequate resources allocated for conservation, our findings raise questions over the utility of conservation assessment science, as currently practiced, to provide useful, pragmatic solutions to conservation planning problems. A reevaluation of the conceptual and operational basis of conservation planning research is urgently required. We recommend the following actions for beginning a process for bridging the research-implementation gap in conservation planning: (1) acknowledge the research-implementation gap is real, (2) source research questions from practitioners, (3) situate research within a broader conservation planning model, (4) expand the social dimension of conservation assessments, (5) support conservation plans with transdisciplinary social learning institutions, (6) reward academics for societal engagement and implementation, and (7) train students in skills for {"}doing{"} conservation. � 2008 Society for Conservation Biology.",
    keywords = "conservation planning, knowledge, learning, literature review, network design, persistence, protected area, research program, resource allocation, student, training, environmental monitoring, environmental protection, information processing, methodology, questionnaire, research, review, Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Environmental Monitoring, Questionnaires, Research",
    author = "Andrew Knight and Richard Cowling and M Rouget and A Balmford and Amanda Lombard and Bruce Campbell",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "610--617",
    journal = "Conservation Biology",
    issn = "0888-8892",
    publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    Knight, A, Cowling, R, Rouget, M, Balmford, A, Lombard, A & Campbell, B 2008, 'Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research�implementation gap', Conservation Biology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 610-617.

    Knowing but not doing : Selecting priority conservation areas and the research�implementation gap. / Knight, Andrew; Cowling, Richard; Rouget, M; Balmford, A; Lombard, Amanda; Campbell, Bruce.

    In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2008, p. 610-617.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Knowing but not doing

    T2 - Selecting priority conservation areas and the research�implementation gap

    AU - Knight, Andrew

    AU - Cowling, Richard

    AU - Rouget, M

    AU - Balmford, A

    AU - Lombard, Amanda

    AU - Campbell, Bruce

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Conservation assessment is a rapidly evolving discipline whose stated goal is the design of networks of protected areas that represent and ensure the persistence of nature (i.e., species, habitats, and environmental processes) by separating priority areas from the activities that degrade or destroy them. Nevertheless, despite a burgeoning scientific literature that ever refines these techniques for allocating conservation resources, it is widely believed that conservation assessments are rarely translated into actions that actually conserve nature. We reviewed the conservation assessment literature in peer-reviewed journals and conducted survey questionnaires of the authors of these studies. Two-thirds of conservation assessments published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature do not deliver conservation action, primarily because most researchers never plan for implementation. This research-implementation gap between conservation science and real-world action is a genuine phenomenon and is a specific example of the "knowing-doing gap" that is widely recognized in management science. Given the woefully inadequate resources allocated for conservation, our findings raise questions over the utility of conservation assessment science, as currently practiced, to provide useful, pragmatic solutions to conservation planning problems. A reevaluation of the conceptual and operational basis of conservation planning research is urgently required. We recommend the following actions for beginning a process for bridging the research-implementation gap in conservation planning: (1) acknowledge the research-implementation gap is real, (2) source research questions from practitioners, (3) situate research within a broader conservation planning model, (4) expand the social dimension of conservation assessments, (5) support conservation plans with transdisciplinary social learning institutions, (6) reward academics for societal engagement and implementation, and (7) train students in skills for "doing" conservation. � 2008 Society for Conservation Biology.

    AB - Conservation assessment is a rapidly evolving discipline whose stated goal is the design of networks of protected areas that represent and ensure the persistence of nature (i.e., species, habitats, and environmental processes) by separating priority areas from the activities that degrade or destroy them. Nevertheless, despite a burgeoning scientific literature that ever refines these techniques for allocating conservation resources, it is widely believed that conservation assessments are rarely translated into actions that actually conserve nature. We reviewed the conservation assessment literature in peer-reviewed journals and conducted survey questionnaires of the authors of these studies. Two-thirds of conservation assessments published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature do not deliver conservation action, primarily because most researchers never plan for implementation. This research-implementation gap between conservation science and real-world action is a genuine phenomenon and is a specific example of the "knowing-doing gap" that is widely recognized in management science. Given the woefully inadequate resources allocated for conservation, our findings raise questions over the utility of conservation assessment science, as currently practiced, to provide useful, pragmatic solutions to conservation planning problems. A reevaluation of the conceptual and operational basis of conservation planning research is urgently required. We recommend the following actions for beginning a process for bridging the research-implementation gap in conservation planning: (1) acknowledge the research-implementation gap is real, (2) source research questions from practitioners, (3) situate research within a broader conservation planning model, (4) expand the social dimension of conservation assessments, (5) support conservation plans with transdisciplinary social learning institutions, (6) reward academics for societal engagement and implementation, and (7) train students in skills for "doing" conservation. � 2008 Society for Conservation Biology.

    KW - conservation planning

    KW - knowledge

    KW - learning

    KW - literature review

    KW - network design

    KW - persistence

    KW - protected area

    KW - research program

    KW - resource allocation

    KW - student

    KW - training

    KW - environmental monitoring

    KW - environmental protection

    KW - information processing

    KW - methodology

    KW - questionnaire

    KW - research

    KW - review

    KW - Conservation of Natural Resources

    KW - Data Collection

    KW - Environmental Monitoring

    KW - Questionnaires

    KW - Research

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 610

    EP - 617

    JO - Conservation Biology

    JF - Conservation Biology

    SN - 0888-8892

    IS - 3

    ER -

    Knight A, Cowling R, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard A, Campbell B. Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research�implementation gap. Conservation Biology. 2008;22(3):610-617.