Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?

Jeffrey Sayer, Chris Margules, Agni Boedhihartono, Allan Dale, T Sunderland, Jatna Supriatna, Ria Suryanthi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Landscape approaches are widely applied in attempts to reconcile tradeoffs amongst different actors with conflicting demands on land and water resources. Key principles for landscape approaches have been endorsed by inter-governmental processes dealing with climate change mitigation and adaptation and biodiversity conservation.

    We review experiences from seven landscapes located in the Congo Basin, Eastern Indonesia and Northern Australia. Landscape initiatives were applied in situations where large-scale extractive industries, local peoples’ livelihoods and global biodiversity objectives were in conflict. We found that common published principles for landscape approaches are not applied systematically in the areas studied. Practitioners draw upon landscape approach principles selectively and adapt them to deal with local conditions. We consider that landscape approaches do not provide silver bullet solutions to these situations nor do they provide an operational framework for large-scale land management. Landscape approaches do, however, provide an organising framework for disentangling the complexity of the landscape and facilitating the investigation of impacts of different courses of action. They enable alternative scenarios for what future landscapes might look like to be investigated and they create the space for multi-stakeholder negotiations. Outcomes from landscape scale approaches are determined by the power differentials amongst stakeholders and the existence, or otherwise, of functional institutions to take decisions and enforce agreements. Landscape approaches cannot overcome disparities in power or entrenched interests nor can they substitute for institutions with authority to establish and legitimise property and resource rights. They can, however, provide a mechanism around which civil society can be mobilised to achieve better land use outcomes. Landscape approaches are successful when they have strong leadership, sustained long-term and facilitated processes, good governance, adequate budgets and adequate metrics for assessing progress. Private sector engagement is necessary and all parties must have sufficient shared interest in outcomes to motivate their participation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)345-355
    Number of pages11
    JournalSustainability Science
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Biodiversity
    Congo
    Water Resources
    Private Sector
    Indonesia
    Ownership
    Climate Change
    Negotiating
    Budgets
    Industry
    Power (Psychology)
    biodiversity
    large-scale industry
    stakeholder
    good governance
    civil society
    resources
    Conflict (Psychology)
    land management
    leadership

    Cite this

    Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A., Dale, A., Sunderland, T., Supriatna, J., & Suryanthi, R. (2015). Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? Sustainability Science, 10(2), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5
    Sayer, Jeffrey ; Margules, Chris ; Boedhihartono, Agni ; Dale, Allan ; Sunderland, T ; Supriatna, Jatna ; Suryanthi, Ria. / Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?. In: Sustainability Science. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 345-355.
    @article{ce2a29f42585464399d91aa6404de7bb,
    title = "Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?",
    abstract = "Landscape approaches are widely applied in attempts to reconcile tradeoffs amongst different actors with conflicting demands on land and water resources. Key principles for landscape approaches have been endorsed by inter-governmental processes dealing with climate change mitigation and adaptation and biodiversity conservation.We review experiences from seven landscapes located in the Congo Basin, Eastern Indonesia and Northern Australia. Landscape initiatives were applied in situations where large-scale extractive industries, local peoples’ livelihoods and global biodiversity objectives were in conflict. We found that common published principles for landscape approaches are not applied systematically in the areas studied. Practitioners draw upon landscape approach principles selectively and adapt them to deal with local conditions. We consider that landscape approaches do not provide silver bullet solutions to these situations nor do they provide an operational framework for large-scale land management. Landscape approaches do, however, provide an organising framework for disentangling the complexity of the landscape and facilitating the investigation of impacts of different courses of action. They enable alternative scenarios for what future landscapes might look like to be investigated and they create the space for multi-stakeholder negotiations. Outcomes from landscape scale approaches are determined by the power differentials amongst stakeholders and the existence, or otherwise, of functional institutions to take decisions and enforce agreements. Landscape approaches cannot overcome disparities in power or entrenched interests nor can they substitute for institutions with authority to establish and legitimise property and resource rights. They can, however, provide a mechanism around which civil society can be mobilised to achieve better land use outcomes. Landscape approaches are successful when they have strong leadership, sustained long-term and facilitated processes, good governance, adequate budgets and adequate metrics for assessing progress. Private sector engagement is necessary and all parties must have sufficient shared interest in outcomes to motivate their participation.",
    author = "Jeffrey Sayer and Chris Margules and Agni Boedhihartono and Allan Dale and T Sunderland and Jatna Supriatna and Ria Suryanthi",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "345--355",
    journal = "Sustainability Science",
    issn = "1862-4057",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    Sayer, J, Margules, C, Boedhihartono, A, Dale, A, Sunderland, T, Supriatna, J & Suryanthi, R 2015, 'Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?', Sustainability Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5

    Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? / Sayer, Jeffrey; Margules, Chris; Boedhihartono, Agni; Dale, Allan; Sunderland, T; Supriatna, Jatna; Suryanthi, Ria.

    In: Sustainability Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2015, p. 345-355.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?

    AU - Sayer, Jeffrey

    AU - Margules, Chris

    AU - Boedhihartono, Agni

    AU - Dale, Allan

    AU - Sunderland, T

    AU - Supriatna, Jatna

    AU - Suryanthi, Ria

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Landscape approaches are widely applied in attempts to reconcile tradeoffs amongst different actors with conflicting demands on land and water resources. Key principles for landscape approaches have been endorsed by inter-governmental processes dealing with climate change mitigation and adaptation and biodiversity conservation.We review experiences from seven landscapes located in the Congo Basin, Eastern Indonesia and Northern Australia. Landscape initiatives were applied in situations where large-scale extractive industries, local peoples’ livelihoods and global biodiversity objectives were in conflict. We found that common published principles for landscape approaches are not applied systematically in the areas studied. Practitioners draw upon landscape approach principles selectively and adapt them to deal with local conditions. We consider that landscape approaches do not provide silver bullet solutions to these situations nor do they provide an operational framework for large-scale land management. Landscape approaches do, however, provide an organising framework for disentangling the complexity of the landscape and facilitating the investigation of impacts of different courses of action. They enable alternative scenarios for what future landscapes might look like to be investigated and they create the space for multi-stakeholder negotiations. Outcomes from landscape scale approaches are determined by the power differentials amongst stakeholders and the existence, or otherwise, of functional institutions to take decisions and enforce agreements. Landscape approaches cannot overcome disparities in power or entrenched interests nor can they substitute for institutions with authority to establish and legitimise property and resource rights. They can, however, provide a mechanism around which civil society can be mobilised to achieve better land use outcomes. Landscape approaches are successful when they have strong leadership, sustained long-term and facilitated processes, good governance, adequate budgets and adequate metrics for assessing progress. Private sector engagement is necessary and all parties must have sufficient shared interest in outcomes to motivate their participation.

    AB - Landscape approaches are widely applied in attempts to reconcile tradeoffs amongst different actors with conflicting demands on land and water resources. Key principles for landscape approaches have been endorsed by inter-governmental processes dealing with climate change mitigation and adaptation and biodiversity conservation.We review experiences from seven landscapes located in the Congo Basin, Eastern Indonesia and Northern Australia. Landscape initiatives were applied in situations where large-scale extractive industries, local peoples’ livelihoods and global biodiversity objectives were in conflict. We found that common published principles for landscape approaches are not applied systematically in the areas studied. Practitioners draw upon landscape approach principles selectively and adapt them to deal with local conditions. We consider that landscape approaches do not provide silver bullet solutions to these situations nor do they provide an operational framework for large-scale land management. Landscape approaches do, however, provide an organising framework for disentangling the complexity of the landscape and facilitating the investigation of impacts of different courses of action. They enable alternative scenarios for what future landscapes might look like to be investigated and they create the space for multi-stakeholder negotiations. Outcomes from landscape scale approaches are determined by the power differentials amongst stakeholders and the existence, or otherwise, of functional institutions to take decisions and enforce agreements. Landscape approaches cannot overcome disparities in power or entrenched interests nor can they substitute for institutions with authority to establish and legitimise property and resource rights. They can, however, provide a mechanism around which civil society can be mobilised to achieve better land use outcomes. Landscape approaches are successful when they have strong leadership, sustained long-term and facilitated processes, good governance, adequate budgets and adequate metrics for assessing progress. Private sector engagement is necessary and all parties must have sufficient shared interest in outcomes to motivate their participation.

    U2 - 10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5

    DO - 10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 345

    EP - 355

    JO - Sustainability Science

    JF - Sustainability Science

    SN - 1862-4057

    IS - 2

    ER -

    Sayer J, Margules C, Boedhihartono A, Dale A, Sunderland T, Supriatna J et al. Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? Sustainability Science. 2015;10(2):345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5