Leadership behaviour displayed by heads of school - its extent and importance

Tricia Vilkinas, Deborah West

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper reports results of analyses of data from an online 360◦ feedback survey with 19 heads of school, 23 line managers and 120 significant others (peers, academic staff and administrative staff) from Australian universities. It focuses on the heads' effectiveness, and the extent and importance of several leadership roles. A series of repeated measures analyses of variance that examined the differences between the heads' of school self-perceptions and the perceptions of their line managers and significant others were undertaken. The analysis of the effectiveness data showed that the heads' of school self evaluations were lower (but not significantly so) than the scores from the other two groups. The three groups agreed on how much importance they ascribed to the leadership roles, and on the extent to which these roles were displayed by the heads of school. There were significant differences between the roles in the extent to which they were displayed and considered important.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)347-361
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
    Volume33
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

    Fingerprint

    leadership
    school
    manager
    staff
    self-image
    Group
    university
    evaluation

    Cite this

    @article{6a423d82f9cd468b8453ed4e2a94818e,
    title = "Leadership behaviour displayed by heads of school - its extent and importance",
    abstract = "This paper reports results of analyses of data from an online 360◦ feedback survey with 19 heads of school, 23 line managers and 120 significant others (peers, academic staff and administrative staff) from Australian universities. It focuses on the heads' effectiveness, and the extent and importance of several leadership roles. A series of repeated measures analyses of variance that examined the differences between the heads' of school self-perceptions and the perceptions of their line managers and significant others were undertaken. The analysis of the effectiveness data showed that the heads' of school self evaluations were lower (but not significantly so) than the scores from the other two groups. The three groups agreed on how much importance they ascribed to the leadership roles, and on the extent to which these roles were displayed by the heads of school. There were significant differences between the roles in the extent to which they were displayed and considered important.",
    author = "Tricia Vilkinas and Deborah West",
    year = "2011",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1080/1360080X.2011.585709",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "347--361",
    journal = "Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management",
    issn = "1360-080X",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "4",

    }

    Leadership behaviour displayed by heads of school - its extent and importance. / Vilkinas, Tricia; West, Deborah.

    In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 33, No. 4, 08.2011, p. 347-361.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Leadership behaviour displayed by heads of school - its extent and importance

    AU - Vilkinas, Tricia

    AU - West, Deborah

    PY - 2011/8

    Y1 - 2011/8

    N2 - This paper reports results of analyses of data from an online 360◦ feedback survey with 19 heads of school, 23 line managers and 120 significant others (peers, academic staff and administrative staff) from Australian universities. It focuses on the heads' effectiveness, and the extent and importance of several leadership roles. A series of repeated measures analyses of variance that examined the differences between the heads' of school self-perceptions and the perceptions of their line managers and significant others were undertaken. The analysis of the effectiveness data showed that the heads' of school self evaluations were lower (but not significantly so) than the scores from the other two groups. The three groups agreed on how much importance they ascribed to the leadership roles, and on the extent to which these roles were displayed by the heads of school. There were significant differences between the roles in the extent to which they were displayed and considered important.

    AB - This paper reports results of analyses of data from an online 360◦ feedback survey with 19 heads of school, 23 line managers and 120 significant others (peers, academic staff and administrative staff) from Australian universities. It focuses on the heads' effectiveness, and the extent and importance of several leadership roles. A series of repeated measures analyses of variance that examined the differences between the heads' of school self-perceptions and the perceptions of their line managers and significant others were undertaken. The analysis of the effectiveness data showed that the heads' of school self evaluations were lower (but not significantly so) than the scores from the other two groups. The three groups agreed on how much importance they ascribed to the leadership roles, and on the extent to which these roles were displayed by the heads of school. There were significant differences between the roles in the extent to which they were displayed and considered important.

    U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2011.585709

    DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2011.585709

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 347

    EP - 361

    JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

    JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

    SN - 1360-080X

    IS - 4

    ER -