Mainstreaming indigenous and local communities’ connections with nature for policy decision-making

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    9 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Exclusion of Indigenous and local communities' connections to the rest-of-nature is a typical problem in policy-decision making. This paper highlights the key attributes of these connections and suggests evaluation pathways to mainstream them into policy development. For this, we integrate and apply the ecosystem services (ES) and human capability concepts. Five socio-cultural and economic values relating to peoples' well-being are identified as the core attributes for developing policy tools: (1) livelihoods; (2) social values; (3) cultural values; (4) spiritual values; and (5) capabilities. For policy tools, common ES frameworks and the relevant ES evaluation techniques that can be applied along with community participatory approaches, are considered. We recommend that developing a pluralistic policy platform is essential to appropriately comprehend Indigenous and local communities' connections with nature for enhancing well-being, not just sustaining livelihoods. A three-step process: (1) identifying attributes of natural systems that are vital for peoples' well-being (beyond their livelihoods); (2) developing locally-specific integrated frameworks; and (3) evaluating identified attributes (monetary and non-monetary), is clearly described in this paper to inform the policy-makers. Recognition and understanding of Indigenous and local communities’ values for nature beyond livelihood opportunities is essential for informing inclusive sustainable development processes and policies.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere00668
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalGlobal Ecology and Conservation
    Volume19
    Issue numberJuly
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

    Fingerprint

    decision making
    livelihood
    ecosystem service
    ecosystem services
    cultural values
    participatory approach
    development policy
    social benefit
    policy development
    sustainable development
    economic valuation
    policy
    attribute
    economics
    evaluation

    Cite this

    @article{c961042954b9486e999a02cfc6918eaa,
    title = "Mainstreaming indigenous and local communities’ connections with nature for policy decision-making",
    abstract = "Exclusion of Indigenous and local communities' connections to the rest-of-nature is a typical problem in policy-decision making. This paper highlights the key attributes of these connections and suggests evaluation pathways to mainstream them into policy development. For this, we integrate and apply the ecosystem services (ES) and human capability concepts. Five socio-cultural and economic values relating to peoples' well-being are identified as the core attributes for developing policy tools: (1) livelihoods; (2) social values; (3) cultural values; (4) spiritual values; and (5) capabilities. For policy tools, common ES frameworks and the relevant ES evaluation techniques that can be applied along with community participatory approaches, are considered. We recommend that developing a pluralistic policy platform is essential to appropriately comprehend Indigenous and local communities' connections with nature for enhancing well-being, not just sustaining livelihoods. A three-step process: (1) identifying attributes of natural systems that are vital for peoples' well-being (beyond their livelihoods); (2) developing locally-specific integrated frameworks; and (3) evaluating identified attributes (monetary and non-monetary), is clearly described in this paper to inform the policy-makers. Recognition and understanding of Indigenous and local communities’ values for nature beyond livelihood opportunities is essential for informing inclusive sustainable development processes and policies.",
    keywords = "Ecosystem services, Ecosystem services framework, Ecosystem services valuation, Indigenous and local communities, Policy decision-making, Well-being",
    author = "Sangha, {Kamaljit K.} and Jeremy Russell-Smith and Robert Costanza",
    year = "2019",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00668",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "1--13",
    journal = "Global Ecology and Conservation",
    issn = "2351-9894",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "July",

    }

    Mainstreaming indigenous and local communities’ connections with nature for policy decision-making. / Sangha, Kamaljit K.; Russell-Smith, Jeremy; Costanza, Robert.

    In: Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 19, No. July, e00668, 01.07.2019, p. 1-13.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Mainstreaming indigenous and local communities’ connections with nature for policy decision-making

    AU - Sangha, Kamaljit K.

    AU - Russell-Smith, Jeremy

    AU - Costanza, Robert

    PY - 2019/7/1

    Y1 - 2019/7/1

    N2 - Exclusion of Indigenous and local communities' connections to the rest-of-nature is a typical problem in policy-decision making. This paper highlights the key attributes of these connections and suggests evaluation pathways to mainstream them into policy development. For this, we integrate and apply the ecosystem services (ES) and human capability concepts. Five socio-cultural and economic values relating to peoples' well-being are identified as the core attributes for developing policy tools: (1) livelihoods; (2) social values; (3) cultural values; (4) spiritual values; and (5) capabilities. For policy tools, common ES frameworks and the relevant ES evaluation techniques that can be applied along with community participatory approaches, are considered. We recommend that developing a pluralistic policy platform is essential to appropriately comprehend Indigenous and local communities' connections with nature for enhancing well-being, not just sustaining livelihoods. A three-step process: (1) identifying attributes of natural systems that are vital for peoples' well-being (beyond their livelihoods); (2) developing locally-specific integrated frameworks; and (3) evaluating identified attributes (monetary and non-monetary), is clearly described in this paper to inform the policy-makers. Recognition and understanding of Indigenous and local communities’ values for nature beyond livelihood opportunities is essential for informing inclusive sustainable development processes and policies.

    AB - Exclusion of Indigenous and local communities' connections to the rest-of-nature is a typical problem in policy-decision making. This paper highlights the key attributes of these connections and suggests evaluation pathways to mainstream them into policy development. For this, we integrate and apply the ecosystem services (ES) and human capability concepts. Five socio-cultural and economic values relating to peoples' well-being are identified as the core attributes for developing policy tools: (1) livelihoods; (2) social values; (3) cultural values; (4) spiritual values; and (5) capabilities. For policy tools, common ES frameworks and the relevant ES evaluation techniques that can be applied along with community participatory approaches, are considered. We recommend that developing a pluralistic policy platform is essential to appropriately comprehend Indigenous and local communities' connections with nature for enhancing well-being, not just sustaining livelihoods. A three-step process: (1) identifying attributes of natural systems that are vital for peoples' well-being (beyond their livelihoods); (2) developing locally-specific integrated frameworks; and (3) evaluating identified attributes (monetary and non-monetary), is clearly described in this paper to inform the policy-makers. Recognition and understanding of Indigenous and local communities’ values for nature beyond livelihood opportunities is essential for informing inclusive sustainable development processes and policies.

    KW - Ecosystem services

    KW - Ecosystem services framework

    KW - Ecosystem services valuation

    KW - Indigenous and local communities

    KW - Policy decision-making

    KW - Well-being

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066135870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00668

    DO - 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00668

    M3 - Article

    VL - 19

    SP - 1

    EP - 13

    JO - Global Ecology and Conservation

    JF - Global Ecology and Conservation

    SN - 2351-9894

    IS - July

    M1 - e00668

    ER -