Making monitoring work

Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network

Emma L. Burns, Philip Tennant, Chris R. Dickman, Graeme Gillespie, Peter T. Green, Ary Hoffmann, David A. Keith, David B. Lindenmayer, Daniel J. Metcalfe, John W. Morgan, Jeremy Russell-Smith, Glenda M. Wardle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In ecological monitoring, data on changes in biotic and environmental attributes over space and time are used to investigate the function and persistence of ecosystems, and how societal actions affect ecosystem attributes. Long-term monitoring is particularly important as it yields insights that are not possible from short-term investigations (e.g. those that span only a few seasons or years). Despite being crucial for understanding our environment, securing long-term monitoring in Australia is notoriously difficult. But there are exceptions from which we can learn. Successful monitoring can be understood by answering two key questions: What are the characteristics of effective monitoring studies? And, what factors contributed to these studies being maintained and remaining influential in the long-term? In this paper, we address these questions, primarily through collating the practical wisdom learned first-hand by a diverse set of people who have successfully led long-term monitoring programs, and subsequently formed the Long Term Ecological Research Network in Australia in 2011 through Commonwealth funding, only to see it de-funded in 2017. We synthesise these learnings to identify four key characteristics of any successful ecological monitoring program, and eight key characteristics of successful long-term monitoring. Essential features include: appropriate study design, adequate data curation and management practices, agile project management and funding strategies, concerted succession planning, diverse and strong partnerships, and varied and effective forms of communication. These features, if each attained sufficiently, should enable the necessary spectrum of (adequately-funded) activity from: (1) robustly collected and curated ecological information; to (2) scientific understanding; to (3) planned intervention; to (4) adaptive management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)755-768
Number of pages14
JournalAustralian Zoologist
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

monitoring
funding
ecosystems
communication (human)
space and time
learning
planning
experimental design

Cite this

Burns, E. L., Tennant, P., Dickman, C. R., Gillespie, G., Green, P. T., Hoffmann, A., ... Wardle, G. M. (2018). Making monitoring work: Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network. Australian Zoologist, 39(4), 755-768. https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2018.030
Burns, Emma L. ; Tennant, Philip ; Dickman, Chris R. ; Gillespie, Graeme ; Green, Peter T. ; Hoffmann, Ary ; Keith, David A. ; Lindenmayer, David B. ; Metcalfe, Daniel J. ; Morgan, John W. ; Russell-Smith, Jeremy ; Wardle, Glenda M. / Making monitoring work : Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network. In: Australian Zoologist. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 755-768.
@article{673c1e122ee7417a96c6361949366209,
title = "Making monitoring work: Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network",
abstract = "In ecological monitoring, data on changes in biotic and environmental attributes over space and time are used to investigate the function and persistence of ecosystems, and how societal actions affect ecosystem attributes. Long-term monitoring is particularly important as it yields insights that are not possible from short-term investigations (e.g. those that span only a few seasons or years). Despite being crucial for understanding our environment, securing long-term monitoring in Australia is notoriously difficult. But there are exceptions from which we can learn. Successful monitoring can be understood by answering two key questions: What are the characteristics of effective monitoring studies? And, what factors contributed to these studies being maintained and remaining influential in the long-term? In this paper, we address these questions, primarily through collating the practical wisdom learned first-hand by a diverse set of people who have successfully led long-term monitoring programs, and subsequently formed the Long Term Ecological Research Network in Australia in 2011 through Commonwealth funding, only to see it de-funded in 2017. We synthesise these learnings to identify four key characteristics of any successful ecological monitoring program, and eight key characteristics of successful long-term monitoring. Essential features include: appropriate study design, adequate data curation and management practices, agile project management and funding strategies, concerted succession planning, diverse and strong partnerships, and varied and effective forms of communication. These features, if each attained sufficiently, should enable the necessary spectrum of (adequately-funded) activity from: (1) robustly collected and curated ecological information; to (2) scientific understanding; to (3) planned intervention; to (4) adaptive management.",
keywords = "Collaboration, Data management, Ecosystem change, Policy, Study design",
author = "Burns, {Emma L.} and Philip Tennant and Dickman, {Chris R.} and Graeme Gillespie and Green, {Peter T.} and Ary Hoffmann and Keith, {David A.} and Lindenmayer, {David B.} and Metcalfe, {Daniel J.} and Morgan, {John W.} and Jeremy Russell-Smith and Wardle, {Glenda M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7882/AZ.2018.030",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "755--768",
journal = "Australian Zoologist",
issn = "0067-2238",
publisher = "Unknown",
number = "4",

}

Burns, EL, Tennant, P, Dickman, CR, Gillespie, G, Green, PT, Hoffmann, A, Keith, DA, Lindenmayer, DB, Metcalfe, DJ, Morgan, JW, Russell-Smith, J & Wardle, GM 2018, 'Making monitoring work: Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network', Australian Zoologist, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 755-768. https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2018.030

Making monitoring work : Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network. / Burns, Emma L.; Tennant, Philip; Dickman, Chris R.; Gillespie, Graeme; Green, Peter T.; Hoffmann, Ary; Keith, David A.; Lindenmayer, David B.; Metcalfe, Daniel J.; Morgan, John W.; Russell-Smith, Jeremy; Wardle, Glenda M.

In: Australian Zoologist, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 755-768.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making monitoring work

T2 - Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network

AU - Burns, Emma L.

AU - Tennant, Philip

AU - Dickman, Chris R.

AU - Gillespie, Graeme

AU - Green, Peter T.

AU - Hoffmann, Ary

AU - Keith, David A.

AU - Lindenmayer, David B.

AU - Metcalfe, Daniel J.

AU - Morgan, John W.

AU - Russell-Smith, Jeremy

AU - Wardle, Glenda M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In ecological monitoring, data on changes in biotic and environmental attributes over space and time are used to investigate the function and persistence of ecosystems, and how societal actions affect ecosystem attributes. Long-term monitoring is particularly important as it yields insights that are not possible from short-term investigations (e.g. those that span only a few seasons or years). Despite being crucial for understanding our environment, securing long-term monitoring in Australia is notoriously difficult. But there are exceptions from which we can learn. Successful monitoring can be understood by answering two key questions: What are the characteristics of effective monitoring studies? And, what factors contributed to these studies being maintained and remaining influential in the long-term? In this paper, we address these questions, primarily through collating the practical wisdom learned first-hand by a diverse set of people who have successfully led long-term monitoring programs, and subsequently formed the Long Term Ecological Research Network in Australia in 2011 through Commonwealth funding, only to see it de-funded in 2017. We synthesise these learnings to identify four key characteristics of any successful ecological monitoring program, and eight key characteristics of successful long-term monitoring. Essential features include: appropriate study design, adequate data curation and management practices, agile project management and funding strategies, concerted succession planning, diverse and strong partnerships, and varied and effective forms of communication. These features, if each attained sufficiently, should enable the necessary spectrum of (adequately-funded) activity from: (1) robustly collected and curated ecological information; to (2) scientific understanding; to (3) planned intervention; to (4) adaptive management.

AB - In ecological monitoring, data on changes in biotic and environmental attributes over space and time are used to investigate the function and persistence of ecosystems, and how societal actions affect ecosystem attributes. Long-term monitoring is particularly important as it yields insights that are not possible from short-term investigations (e.g. those that span only a few seasons or years). Despite being crucial for understanding our environment, securing long-term monitoring in Australia is notoriously difficult. But there are exceptions from which we can learn. Successful monitoring can be understood by answering two key questions: What are the characteristics of effective monitoring studies? And, what factors contributed to these studies being maintained and remaining influential in the long-term? In this paper, we address these questions, primarily through collating the practical wisdom learned first-hand by a diverse set of people who have successfully led long-term monitoring programs, and subsequently formed the Long Term Ecological Research Network in Australia in 2011 through Commonwealth funding, only to see it de-funded in 2017. We synthesise these learnings to identify four key characteristics of any successful ecological monitoring program, and eight key characteristics of successful long-term monitoring. Essential features include: appropriate study design, adequate data curation and management practices, agile project management and funding strategies, concerted succession planning, diverse and strong partnerships, and varied and effective forms of communication. These features, if each attained sufficiently, should enable the necessary spectrum of (adequately-funded) activity from: (1) robustly collected and curated ecological information; to (2) scientific understanding; to (3) planned intervention; to (4) adaptive management.

KW - Collaboration

KW - Data management

KW - Ecosystem change

KW - Policy

KW - Study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064699572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7882/AZ.2018.030

DO - 10.7882/AZ.2018.030

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 755

EP - 768

JO - Australian Zoologist

JF - Australian Zoologist

SN - 0067-2238

IS - 4

ER -

Burns EL, Tennant P, Dickman CR, Gillespie G, Green PT, Hoffmann A et al. Making monitoring work: Insights and lessons from Australia’s Long Term Ecological Research Network. Australian Zoologist. 2018 Jan 1;39(4):755-768. https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2018.030