Abstract
We studied the pattern of acquisition of breeding positions among helpers in a population of Grey-crowned Babblers Pomatostomus temporalis rubecula in the monsoon tropics of northwestern Australia, using both behavioural and molecular data. In particular, we focused on sex differences, kinship, and their interactions among emigrating helpers. Moreover, we also considered whether intergroup movement and extra-pair mating contributed to incest avoidance in our population. The advantage of this material is that there are previous studies of populations in different regions, and the comparison of the results may provide a better understanding of ecological factors driving helping behaviour in cooperative breeding. Three options for a mature helper to acquire a breeding position were observed: establishing a new territory, emigrating to an existing territory, or waiting in the natal territory for a breeding vacancy. In many cases, male helpers took the third option, while female helpers took the second one. Our population of Grey-crowned Babblers seemed not to be actively avoiding incest. Female helpers tended to disperse from natal groups more than males, but neither intergroup movements nor extra-pair mating were effective in avoiding incestuous breeding. In some groups, dominant breeders were closely related to each other. The frequency of extra-pair mating in our population was similar to that of the New South Wales population previously studied, but dispersal distances were twice as great. The two populations also differ in mean clutch size and group size. Such variation in life history characteristics among different populations of cooperatively breeding species has received little attention, but has the potential to explain how cooperative breeding systems are modified by environmental factors.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-13 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Ornithological Science |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Apr 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We are very grateful to Mr R. Luxton for his hospitality and permission to conduct the research in his property at the Coomalie Farm. For assistance in the field, we thank K. Ueda, M. Takagi, O. Mikami, H. E. Amano, Y. Takaki, Y. Kataoka, Y. Hayashi, S. Mori, N. Kawasaki, M. Kinoshita, Y. Katsuno, T. Okuda, M. Nakamura, D. Yamashita, N. Haruyama and T. Eguchi. We also are very grateful to two reviewers for their valuable comments on this manuscript. This study was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Society for Promotion of Science to K. Eguchi (14405007, 17255003). This study was conducted under permits from Charles Darwin University Animal Ethics Committee (A02021, A05025), the Park and Wildlife Commission of Northern Territory (14586, 17289, 20934, 22828, 24411, 28755) and the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme (authority number 2606).
Funding Information:
We are very grateful to Mr R. Luxton for his hospitality and permission to conduct the research in his property at the Coomalie Farm. For assistance in the field, we thank K. Ueda, M. Takagi, O. Mikami, H. E. Amano, Y. Takaki, Y. Kataoka, Y. Hayashi, S. Mori, N. Kawasaki, M. Kinoshita, Y. Katsuno, T. Okuda, M. Nakamura, D. Yamashita, N. Haruyama and T. Eguchi. We also are very grateful to two reviewers for their valuable comments on this manuscript. This study was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Society for Promotion of Science to K. Eguchi ?14405007, 17255003). This study was conducted under permits from Charles Darwin University Animal Ethics Committee ?A02021, A05025), the Park and Wildlife Commission of Northern Territory ?14586, 17289, 20934, 22828, 24411, 28755) and the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme ?authority number 2606).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Ornithological Society of Japan.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.