Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation

An Australian case-study

Anna R. Renwick, Catherine J. Robinson, Stephen T. Garnett, Ian Leiper, Hugh P. Possingham, Josie Carwardine

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia's 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45% of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52% of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0173876
    Pages (from-to)1-11
    Number of pages11
    JournalPLoS One
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2017

    Fingerprint

    Endangered Species
    Biodiversity
    threatened species
    land management
    Conservation
    case studies
    indigenous peoples
    Civil Rights
    biodiversity
    Fresh Water
    Legislation
    Vertebrates
    laws and regulations
    vertebrates

    Cite this

    Renwick, A. R., Robinson, C. J., Garnett, S. T., Leiper, I., Possingham, H. P., & Carwardine, J. (2017). Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study. PLoS One, 12(3), 1-11. [e0173876]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876
    Renwick, Anna R. ; Robinson, Catherine J. ; Garnett, Stephen T. ; Leiper, Ian ; Possingham, Hugh P. ; Carwardine, Josie. / Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation : An Australian case-study. In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 1-11.
    @article{3a523b4d9f1441f0bdd6bff5834bbb4b,
    title = "Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study",
    abstract = "Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia's 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45{\%} of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52{\%} of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so.",
    author = "Renwick, {Anna R.} and Robinson, {Catherine J.} and Garnett, {Stephen T.} and Ian Leiper and Possingham, {Hugh P.} and Josie Carwardine",
    year = "2017",
    month = "3",
    day = "14",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0173876",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "1--11",
    journal = "PLoS One",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLoS)",
    number = "3",

    }

    Renwick, AR, Robinson, CJ, Garnett, ST, Leiper, I, Possingham, HP & Carwardine, J 2017, 'Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study', PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 3, e0173876, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173876

    Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation : An Australian case-study. / Renwick, Anna R.; Robinson, Catherine J.; Garnett, Stephen T.; Leiper, Ian; Possingham, Hugh P.; Carwardine, Josie.

    In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 3, e0173876, 14.03.2017, p. 1-11.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation

    T2 - An Australian case-study

    AU - Renwick, Anna R.

    AU - Robinson, Catherine J.

    AU - Garnett, Stephen T.

    AU - Leiper, Ian

    AU - Possingham, Hugh P.

    AU - Carwardine, Josie

    PY - 2017/3/14

    Y1 - 2017/3/14

    N2 - Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia's 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45% of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52% of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so.

    AB - Much biodiversity lives on lands to which Indigenous people retain strong legal and management rights. However this is rarely quantified. Here we provide the first quantitative overview of the importance of Indigenous land for a critical and vulnerable part of biodiversity, threatened species, using the continent of Australia as a case study. We find that three quarters of Australia's 272 terrestrial or freshwater vertebrate species listed as threatened under national legislation have projected ranges that overlap Indigenous lands. On average this overlap represents 45% of the range of each threatened species while Indigenous land is 52% of the country. Hotspots where multiple threatened species ranges overlap occur predominantly in coastal Northern Australia. Our analysis quantifies the vast potential of Indigenous land in Australia for contributing to national level conservation goals, and identifies the main land management arrangements available to Indigenous people which may enable them to deliver those goals should they choose to do so.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015168486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173876

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173876

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 1

    EP - 11

    JO - PLoS One

    JF - PLoS One

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 3

    M1 - e0173876

    ER -