Material anamnesis and the prompting of aesthetic worlds: The psycho-historical theory of artworks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Many scholars view artworks as the products of cultural history and arbitrary institutional conventions. Others construe art as the result of psychological mechanisms internal to the organism. These historical and psychological approaches are often viewed as foes rather than friends. Is it possible to combine these two approaches in a unified analysis of the perception and consciousness of artworks? I defend a positive answer to this question and propose a psycho-historical theory, which argues that artworks are historical
and material artefacts designed to prompt mental activities and elicit the conscious experience of aesthetic worlds. My argument suggests that the material components of artworks — termed their ‘material substrata’— are crucial mediators between historical contexts and the mental activities elicited by the perception of artworks
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-109
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Consciousness Studies: controversies in science and the humanities
Volume16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

aesthetics
esthetics
Esthetics
Psychology
Art
Consciousness
Artifacts
cultural history
History
consciousness
arts
art
artifact
history
organisms
material
world
Aesthetics
Anamnesis
Historical Theory

Cite this

@article{b56ce2c242d147f48f7b8102e0112230,
title = "Material anamnesis and the prompting of aesthetic worlds: The psycho-historical theory of artworks",
abstract = "Many scholars view artworks as the products of cultural history and arbitrary institutional conventions. Others construe art as the result of psychological mechanisms internal to the organism. These historical and psychological approaches are often viewed as foes rather than friends. Is it possible to combine these two approaches in a unified analysis of the perception and consciousness of artworks? I defend a positive answer to this question and propose a psycho-historical theory, which argues that artworks are historicaland material artefacts designed to prompt mental activities and elicit the conscious experience of aesthetic worlds. My argument suggests that the material components of artworks — termed their ‘material substrata’— are crucial mediators between historical contexts and the mental activities elicited by the perception of artworks",
author = "Nicolas Bullot",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "85--109",
journal = "Journal of Consciousness Studies: controversies in science and the humanities",
issn = "1355-8250",
publisher = "Imprint Academic",
number = "1",

}

Material anamnesis and the prompting of aesthetic worlds: The psycho-historical theory of artworks. / Bullot, Nicolas.

In: Journal of Consciousness Studies: controversies in science and the humanities, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 85-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Material anamnesis and the prompting of aesthetic worlds: The psycho-historical theory of artworks

AU - Bullot, Nicolas

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Many scholars view artworks as the products of cultural history and arbitrary institutional conventions. Others construe art as the result of psychological mechanisms internal to the organism. These historical and psychological approaches are often viewed as foes rather than friends. Is it possible to combine these two approaches in a unified analysis of the perception and consciousness of artworks? I defend a positive answer to this question and propose a psycho-historical theory, which argues that artworks are historicaland material artefacts designed to prompt mental activities and elicit the conscious experience of aesthetic worlds. My argument suggests that the material components of artworks — termed their ‘material substrata’— are crucial mediators between historical contexts and the mental activities elicited by the perception of artworks

AB - Many scholars view artworks as the products of cultural history and arbitrary institutional conventions. Others construe art as the result of psychological mechanisms internal to the organism. These historical and psychological approaches are often viewed as foes rather than friends. Is it possible to combine these two approaches in a unified analysis of the perception and consciousness of artworks? I defend a positive answer to this question and propose a psycho-historical theory, which argues that artworks are historicaland material artefacts designed to prompt mental activities and elicit the conscious experience of aesthetic worlds. My argument suggests that the material components of artworks — termed their ‘material substrata’— are crucial mediators between historical contexts and the mental activities elicited by the perception of artworks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59549099730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 85

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Consciousness Studies: controversies in science and the humanities

JF - Journal of Consciousness Studies: controversies in science and the humanities

SN - 1355-8250

IS - 1

ER -