Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data

Corey Bradshaw, D Sims, Graeme Hays

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Recent advances in telemetry technology have created a wealth of tracking data available for many animal species moving over spatial scales from tens of meters to tens of thousands of kilometers. Increasingly, such data sets are being used for quantitative movement analyses aimed at extracting fundamental biological signals such as optimal searching behavior and scale-dependent foraging decisions. We show here that the location error inherent in various tracking technologies reduces the ability to detect patterns of behavior within movements. Our analyses endeavored to set out a series of initial ground rules for ecologists to help ensure that sampling noise is not misinterpreted as a real biological signal. We simulated animal movement tracks using specialized random walks known as L� flights at three spatial scales of investigation: 100-km, 10-km, and 1-km maximum daily step lengths. The locations generated in the simulations were then blurred using known error distributions associated with commonly applied tracking methods: the Global Positioning System (GPS), Argos polar-orbiting satellites, and light-level geolocation. Deviations from the idealized L� flight pattern were assessed for each track after incrementing levels of location error were applied at each spatial scale, with additional assessments of the effect of error on scale-dependent movement patterns measured using fractal mean dimension and first-passage time (FPT) analyses. The accuracy of parameter estimation (L� ?, fractal mean D, and variance in FPT) declined precipitously at threshold errors relative to each spatial scale. At 100-km maximum daily step lengths, error standard deviations of ?10 km seriously eroded the biological patterns evident in the simulated tracks, with analogous thresholds at the 10-km and 1-km scales (error SD ? 1.3 km and 0.07 km, respectively). Temporal subsampling of the simulated tracks maintained some elements of the biological signals depending on error level and spatial scale. Failure to account for large errors relative to the scale of movement can produce substantial biases in the interpretation of movement patterns. This study provides researchers with a framework for understanding the limitations of their data and identifies how temporal subsampling can help to reduce the influence of spatial error on their conclusions. � 2007 by the Ecological Society of America.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)628-638
    Number of pages11
    JournalEcological Appplications
    Volume17
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    erosion
    animal
    flight
    Argo
    telemetry
    GPS
    sampling
    simulation

    Cite this

    Bradshaw, Corey ; Sims, D ; Hays, Graeme. / Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data. In: Ecological Appplications. 2007 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 628-638.
    @article{713993680c2049bbbaa17e431bd1467f,
    title = "Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data",
    abstract = "Recent advances in telemetry technology have created a wealth of tracking data available for many animal species moving over spatial scales from tens of meters to tens of thousands of kilometers. Increasingly, such data sets are being used for quantitative movement analyses aimed at extracting fundamental biological signals such as optimal searching behavior and scale-dependent foraging decisions. We show here that the location error inherent in various tracking technologies reduces the ability to detect patterns of behavior within movements. Our analyses endeavored to set out a series of initial ground rules for ecologists to help ensure that sampling noise is not misinterpreted as a real biological signal. We simulated animal movement tracks using specialized random walks known as L� flights at three spatial scales of investigation: 100-km, 10-km, and 1-km maximum daily step lengths. The locations generated in the simulations were then blurred using known error distributions associated with commonly applied tracking methods: the Global Positioning System (GPS), Argos polar-orbiting satellites, and light-level geolocation. Deviations from the idealized L� flight pattern were assessed for each track after incrementing levels of location error were applied at each spatial scale, with additional assessments of the effect of error on scale-dependent movement patterns measured using fractal mean dimension and first-passage time (FPT) analyses. The accuracy of parameter estimation (L� ?, fractal mean D, and variance in FPT) declined precipitously at threshold errors relative to each spatial scale. At 100-km maximum daily step lengths, error standard deviations of ?10 km seriously eroded the biological patterns evident in the simulated tracks, with analogous thresholds at the 10-km and 1-km scales (error SD ? 1.3 km and 0.07 km, respectively). Temporal subsampling of the simulated tracks maintained some elements of the biological signals depending on error level and spatial scale. Failure to account for large errors relative to the scale of movement can produce substantial biases in the interpretation of movement patterns. This study provides researchers with a framework for understanding the limitations of their data and identifies how temporal subsampling can help to reduce the influence of spatial error on their conclusions. � 2007 by the Ecological Society of America.",
    keywords = "detection method, error analysis, foraging behavior, GPS, measurement method, movement, radiotelemetry, signaling, threshold, animal, article, behavior, biological model, computer simulation, ecosystem, methodology, physiology, telemetry, wild animal, Animals, Animals, Wild, Computer Simulation, Ecosystem, Models, Biological, Spatial Behavior, Telemetry, Animalia",
    author = "Corey Bradshaw and D Sims and Graeme Hays",
    year = "2007",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "628--638",
    journal = "Ecological Appplications",
    issn = "1051-0761",
    publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
    number = "2",

    }

    Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data. / Bradshaw, Corey; Sims, D; Hays, Graeme.

    In: Ecological Appplications, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2007, p. 628-638.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data

    AU - Bradshaw, Corey

    AU - Sims, D

    AU - Hays, Graeme

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Recent advances in telemetry technology have created a wealth of tracking data available for many animal species moving over spatial scales from tens of meters to tens of thousands of kilometers. Increasingly, such data sets are being used for quantitative movement analyses aimed at extracting fundamental biological signals such as optimal searching behavior and scale-dependent foraging decisions. We show here that the location error inherent in various tracking technologies reduces the ability to detect patterns of behavior within movements. Our analyses endeavored to set out a series of initial ground rules for ecologists to help ensure that sampling noise is not misinterpreted as a real biological signal. We simulated animal movement tracks using specialized random walks known as L� flights at three spatial scales of investigation: 100-km, 10-km, and 1-km maximum daily step lengths. The locations generated in the simulations were then blurred using known error distributions associated with commonly applied tracking methods: the Global Positioning System (GPS), Argos polar-orbiting satellites, and light-level geolocation. Deviations from the idealized L� flight pattern were assessed for each track after incrementing levels of location error were applied at each spatial scale, with additional assessments of the effect of error on scale-dependent movement patterns measured using fractal mean dimension and first-passage time (FPT) analyses. The accuracy of parameter estimation (L� ?, fractal mean D, and variance in FPT) declined precipitously at threshold errors relative to each spatial scale. At 100-km maximum daily step lengths, error standard deviations of ?10 km seriously eroded the biological patterns evident in the simulated tracks, with analogous thresholds at the 10-km and 1-km scales (error SD ? 1.3 km and 0.07 km, respectively). Temporal subsampling of the simulated tracks maintained some elements of the biological signals depending on error level and spatial scale. Failure to account for large errors relative to the scale of movement can produce substantial biases in the interpretation of movement patterns. This study provides researchers with a framework for understanding the limitations of their data and identifies how temporal subsampling can help to reduce the influence of spatial error on their conclusions. � 2007 by the Ecological Society of America.

    AB - Recent advances in telemetry technology have created a wealth of tracking data available for many animal species moving over spatial scales from tens of meters to tens of thousands of kilometers. Increasingly, such data sets are being used for quantitative movement analyses aimed at extracting fundamental biological signals such as optimal searching behavior and scale-dependent foraging decisions. We show here that the location error inherent in various tracking technologies reduces the ability to detect patterns of behavior within movements. Our analyses endeavored to set out a series of initial ground rules for ecologists to help ensure that sampling noise is not misinterpreted as a real biological signal. We simulated animal movement tracks using specialized random walks known as L� flights at three spatial scales of investigation: 100-km, 10-km, and 1-km maximum daily step lengths. The locations generated in the simulations were then blurred using known error distributions associated with commonly applied tracking methods: the Global Positioning System (GPS), Argos polar-orbiting satellites, and light-level geolocation. Deviations from the idealized L� flight pattern were assessed for each track after incrementing levels of location error were applied at each spatial scale, with additional assessments of the effect of error on scale-dependent movement patterns measured using fractal mean dimension and first-passage time (FPT) analyses. The accuracy of parameter estimation (L� ?, fractal mean D, and variance in FPT) declined precipitously at threshold errors relative to each spatial scale. At 100-km maximum daily step lengths, error standard deviations of ?10 km seriously eroded the biological patterns evident in the simulated tracks, with analogous thresholds at the 10-km and 1-km scales (error SD ? 1.3 km and 0.07 km, respectively). Temporal subsampling of the simulated tracks maintained some elements of the biological signals depending on error level and spatial scale. Failure to account for large errors relative to the scale of movement can produce substantial biases in the interpretation of movement patterns. This study provides researchers with a framework for understanding the limitations of their data and identifies how temporal subsampling can help to reduce the influence of spatial error on their conclusions. � 2007 by the Ecological Society of America.

    KW - detection method

    KW - error analysis

    KW - foraging behavior

    KW - GPS

    KW - measurement method

    KW - movement

    KW - radiotelemetry

    KW - signaling

    KW - threshold

    KW - animal

    KW - article

    KW - behavior

    KW - biological model

    KW - computer simulation

    KW - ecosystem

    KW - methodology

    KW - physiology

    KW - telemetry

    KW - wild animal

    KW - Animals

    KW - Animals, Wild

    KW - Computer Simulation

    KW - Ecosystem

    KW - Models, Biological

    KW - Spatial Behavior

    KW - Telemetry

    KW - Animalia

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 628

    EP - 638

    JO - Ecological Appplications

    JF - Ecological Appplications

    SN - 1051-0761

    IS - 2

    ER -