TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring cancer in Indigenous populations
AU - Sarfati, Diana
AU - Garvey, Gail
AU - Robson, Bridget
AU - Moore, Suzanne
AU - Cunningham, Ruth
AU - Withrow, Diana
AU - Griffiths, Kalinda
AU - Caron, Nadine R.
AU - Bray, Freddie
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - It is estimated that there are 370 million indigenous peoples in 90 countries globally. Indigenous peoples generally face substantial disadvantage and poorer health status compared with nonindigenous peoples. Population-level cancer surveillance provides data to set priorities, inform policies, and monitor progress over time. Measuring the cancer burden of vulnerable subpopulations, particularly indigenous peoples, is problematic. There are a number of practical and methodological issues potentially resulting in substantial underestimation of cancer incidence and mortality rates, and biased survival rates, among indigenous peoples. This, in turn, may result in a deprioritization of cancer-related programs and policies among these populations. This commentary describes key issues relating to cancer surveillance among indigenous populations including 1) suboptimal identification of indigenous populations, 2) numerator-denominator bias, 3) problems with data linkage in survival analysis, and 4) statistical analytic considerations. We suggest solutions that can be implemented to strengthen the visibility of indigenous peoples around the world. These include acknowledgment of the central importance of full engagement of indigenous peoples with all data-related processes, encouraging the use of indigenous identifiers in national and regional data sets and mitigation and/or careful assessment of biases inherent in cancer surveillance methods for indigenous peoples.
AB - It is estimated that there are 370 million indigenous peoples in 90 countries globally. Indigenous peoples generally face substantial disadvantage and poorer health status compared with nonindigenous peoples. Population-level cancer surveillance provides data to set priorities, inform policies, and monitor progress over time. Measuring the cancer burden of vulnerable subpopulations, particularly indigenous peoples, is problematic. There are a number of practical and methodological issues potentially resulting in substantial underestimation of cancer incidence and mortality rates, and biased survival rates, among indigenous peoples. This, in turn, may result in a deprioritization of cancer-related programs and policies among these populations. This commentary describes key issues relating to cancer surveillance among indigenous populations including 1) suboptimal identification of indigenous populations, 2) numerator-denominator bias, 3) problems with data linkage in survival analysis, and 4) statistical analytic considerations. We suggest solutions that can be implemented to strengthen the visibility of indigenous peoples around the world. These include acknowledgment of the central importance of full engagement of indigenous peoples with all data-related processes, encouraging the use of indigenous identifiers in national and regional data sets and mitigation and/or careful assessment of biases inherent in cancer surveillance methods for indigenous peoples.
KW - Cancer incidence
KW - Cancer surveillance
KW - Cancer survival
KW - First nations
KW - Indigenous
KW - Māori
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042647763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.02.005
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 29503062
AN - SCOPUS:85042647763
SN - 1047-2797
VL - 28
SP - 335
EP - 342
JO - Annals of Epidemiology
JF - Annals of Epidemiology
IS - 5
ER -