Medical Abortion in Australia: What are the legal and clinical risks? Is Medical Abortion Over-regulated?

A O'Rourke, Suzanne Belton, Ea Mulligan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    This article examines the clinical and legal risks of early medical abortion. After providing an overview of the history of mifepristone in Australia, the evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of medical abortion is discussed. It is argued that the negligible medical risks associated with mifepristone do not justify the restrictive regulatory measures imposed on medical practitioners. The article then turns to the legal risks and considers whether medical practitioners are vulnerable to prosecution under existing State and Territory laws. It is argued that providing early medical abortion services in a number of jurisdictions is legally ambiguous, potentially posing a threat of prosecution to medical practitioners. The need for law reform is evident by the fact that in four jurisdictions it remains in the criminal statutes, creating legal uncertainty for both medical practitioners and women. The article concludes that there is sufficient evidence to allow some “demedicalisation” of medical abortion. However, this is only possible if the legal status of abortion in State and Territory laws is addressed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)221-238
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016


    Dive into the research topics of 'Medical Abortion in Australia: What are the legal and clinical risks? Is Medical Abortion Over-regulated?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this