Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies

What is their Value Proposition?

Jon Mason, Lung-Hsiang Wong, Mike Sharples, Yuan Gao, Chee-Kit Looi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Paper published in ProceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The need for nurturing the global citizens and innovators of the 21st century has prompted the education field to re-examine what it takes to deliver or facilitate quality teaching and learning. Thus, annual synthesis efforts have ensued where experts are convened to analyse trends and produce reports to help practitioners, policymakers, researchers and even learners to explore both the bigger picture and specific aspects of techno-pedagogical diversity. Such informed synthesis is typically harder to access through regular means. Two such initiatives are the Horizon Project and Innovating Pedagogy. While both report series have been rather well exposed among their target audience over the years, they are not meant to be final products or echo chambers; instead, they serve to catalyse collective reflections and exchanges within the community in order to rise above and challenge the viewpoints put forward by the reports. This panel aims to provide a platform for eliciting opinions and critiques on the purposes, the synthesis methods, the value and the limitations of such or similar report series. Key personnel behind the two stated report series will provide insights on how the reports were developed; other panelists will offer their critical views on the reports from the perspective of general "users". Through the panel interactions, it is hoped that the participants will be able to establish a renewed understanding on how to make meaningful interpretation and use of the report series to impact the directions of research in and practice of technology-enhanced learning.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication25th International Conference on Computers in Education
Subtitle of host publicationTechnology and Innovation: Computer-based Educational Systems for the 21st Century
EditorsWenli Chen, Jie-Chi YAng, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Su Luan Wong, Antonija Mitrovic
Place of PublicationTaiwan
PublisherAsia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE)
Pagesi35-i39
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 4 Dec 2017
Event25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-based Educational Systems for the 21st Century - Rydges Hotel, Christchurch, New Zealand
Duration: 4 Dec 20178 Dec 2017
http://icce2017.canterbury.ac.nz/

Conference

Conference25th International Conference on Computers in Education
Abbreviated titleICCE2017
CountryNew Zealand
CityChristchurch
Period4/12/178/12/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

educational technology
innovator
trend
chamber
learning
Values
personnel
expert
citizen
interpretation
Teaching
interaction
community
education

Cite this

Mason, J., Wong, L-H., Sharples, M., Gao, Y., & Looi, C-K. (2017). Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies: What is their Value Proposition? In W. Chen, J-C. YAng, A. F. Mohd Ayub, S. L. Wong, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), 25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-based Educational Systems for the 21st Century (pp. i35-i39). Taiwan: Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE).
Mason, Jon ; Wong, Lung-Hsiang ; Sharples, Mike ; Gao, Yuan ; Looi, Chee-Kit. / Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies : What is their Value Proposition?. 25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-based Educational Systems for the 21st Century. editor / Wenli Chen ; Jie-Chi YAng ; Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub ; Su Luan Wong ; Antonija Mitrovic. Taiwan : Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE), 2017. pp. i35-i39
@inproceedings{1df26e46cb0c4840bc893a8cf3815f8f,
title = "Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies: What is their Value Proposition?",
abstract = "The need for nurturing the global citizens and innovators of the 21st century has prompted the education field to re-examine what it takes to deliver or facilitate quality teaching and learning. Thus, annual synthesis efforts have ensued where experts are convened to analyse trends and produce reports to help practitioners, policymakers, researchers and even learners to explore both the bigger picture and specific aspects of techno-pedagogical diversity. Such informed synthesis is typically harder to access through regular means. Two such initiatives are the Horizon Project and Innovating Pedagogy. While both report series have been rather well exposed among their target audience over the years, they are not meant to be final products or echo chambers; instead, they serve to catalyse collective reflections and exchanges within the community in order to rise above and challenge the viewpoints put forward by the reports. This panel aims to provide a platform for eliciting opinions and critiques on the purposes, the synthesis methods, the value and the limitations of such or similar report series. Key personnel behind the two stated report series will provide insights on how the reports were developed; other panelists will offer their critical views on the reports from the perspective of general {"}users{"}. Through the panel interactions, it is hoped that the participants will be able to establish a renewed understanding on how to make meaningful interpretation and use of the report series to impact the directions of research in and practice of technology-enhanced learning.",
keywords = "pedagogy, innovation, Reporting, learning technology",
author = "Jon Mason and Lung-Hsiang Wong and Mike Sharples and Yuan Gao and Chee-Kit Looi",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "4",
language = "English",
pages = "i35--i39",
editor = "Wenli Chen and Jie-Chi YAng and {Mohd Ayub}, {Ahmad Fauzi} and Wong, {Su Luan} and Antonija Mitrovic",
booktitle = "25th International Conference on Computers in Education",
publisher = "Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE)",

}

Mason, J, Wong, L-H, Sharples, M, Gao, Y & Looi, C-K 2017, Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies: What is their Value Proposition? in W Chen, J-C YAng, AF Mohd Ayub, SL Wong & A Mitrovic (eds), 25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-based Educational Systems for the 21st Century. Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE), Taiwan, pp. i35-i39, 25th International Conference on Computers in Education, Christchurch, New Zealand, 4/12/17.

Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies : What is their Value Proposition? / Mason, Jon; Wong, Lung-Hsiang; Sharples, Mike; Gao, Yuan; Looi, Chee-Kit.

25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-based Educational Systems for the 21st Century. ed. / Wenli Chen; Jie-Chi YAng; Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub; Su Luan Wong; Antonija Mitrovic. Taiwan : Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE), 2017. p. i35-i39.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Paper published in ProceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies

T2 - What is their Value Proposition?

AU - Mason, Jon

AU - Wong, Lung-Hsiang

AU - Sharples, Mike

AU - Gao, Yuan

AU - Looi, Chee-Kit

PY - 2017/12/4

Y1 - 2017/12/4

N2 - The need for nurturing the global citizens and innovators of the 21st century has prompted the education field to re-examine what it takes to deliver or facilitate quality teaching and learning. Thus, annual synthesis efforts have ensued where experts are convened to analyse trends and produce reports to help practitioners, policymakers, researchers and even learners to explore both the bigger picture and specific aspects of techno-pedagogical diversity. Such informed synthesis is typically harder to access through regular means. Two such initiatives are the Horizon Project and Innovating Pedagogy. While both report series have been rather well exposed among their target audience over the years, they are not meant to be final products or echo chambers; instead, they serve to catalyse collective reflections and exchanges within the community in order to rise above and challenge the viewpoints put forward by the reports. This panel aims to provide a platform for eliciting opinions and critiques on the purposes, the synthesis methods, the value and the limitations of such or similar report series. Key personnel behind the two stated report series will provide insights on how the reports were developed; other panelists will offer their critical views on the reports from the perspective of general "users". Through the panel interactions, it is hoped that the participants will be able to establish a renewed understanding on how to make meaningful interpretation and use of the report series to impact the directions of research in and practice of technology-enhanced learning.

AB - The need for nurturing the global citizens and innovators of the 21st century has prompted the education field to re-examine what it takes to deliver or facilitate quality teaching and learning. Thus, annual synthesis efforts have ensued where experts are convened to analyse trends and produce reports to help practitioners, policymakers, researchers and even learners to explore both the bigger picture and specific aspects of techno-pedagogical diversity. Such informed synthesis is typically harder to access through regular means. Two such initiatives are the Horizon Project and Innovating Pedagogy. While both report series have been rather well exposed among their target audience over the years, they are not meant to be final products or echo chambers; instead, they serve to catalyse collective reflections and exchanges within the community in order to rise above and challenge the viewpoints put forward by the reports. This panel aims to provide a platform for eliciting opinions and critiques on the purposes, the synthesis methods, the value and the limitations of such or similar report series. Key personnel behind the two stated report series will provide insights on how the reports were developed; other panelists will offer their critical views on the reports from the perspective of general "users". Through the panel interactions, it is hoped that the participants will be able to establish a renewed understanding on how to make meaningful interpretation and use of the report series to impact the directions of research in and practice of technology-enhanced learning.

KW - pedagogy

KW - innovation

KW - Reporting

KW - learning technology

UR - http://www.apsce.net/icce/icce2017/proceedings_main.html

M3 - Conference Paper published in Proceedings

SP - i35-i39

BT - 25th International Conference on Computers in Education

A2 - Chen, Wenli

A2 - YAng, Jie-Chi

A2 - Mohd Ayub, Ahmad Fauzi

A2 - Wong, Su Luan

A2 - Mitrovic, Antonija

PB - Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE)

CY - Taiwan

ER -

Mason J, Wong L-H, Sharples M, Gao Y, Looi C-K. Meta-Synthesis and Trends Reports of Educational Technologies and Pedagogies: What is their Value Proposition? In Chen W, YAng J-C, Mohd Ayub AF, Wong SL, Mitrovic A, editors, 25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-based Educational Systems for the 21st Century. Taiwan: Asia Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE). 2017. p. i35-i39