Methodological pluralism for better evaluations of complex interventions: lessons from evaluating an innovation platform in Australia

J. Bailie, F. Cunningham, S. Abimbola, A. Laycock, R. Bainbridge, R. Bailie, K. Conte, M. Passey, D. Peiris

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Complex interventions, such as innovation platforms, pose challenges for evaluators. A variety of methodological approaches are often required to build a more complete and comprehensive understanding of how complex interventions work. In this paper, we outline and critically appraise a methodologically pluralist evaluation of an innovation platform to strengthen primary care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. In doing so, we aim to identify lessons learned from the approach taken and add to existing literature on implementing evaluations in complex settings, such as innovation platforms. The pluralist design used four evaluation approaches-developmental evaluation, principles-focused evaluation, network analysis, and framework analysis-with differing strengths and challenges. Taken together, the multiple evaluation approaches yielded a detailed description and nuanced understanding of the formation, functioning and outcomes of the innovation platform that would be difficult to achieve with any single evaluation method. While a methodologically pluralist design may place additional pressure on logistical and analytic resources available, it enables a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that underlie complex interventions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number14
    Pages (from-to)1-14
    Number of pages14
    JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Jan 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological pluralism for better evaluations of complex interventions: lessons from evaluating an innovation platform in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this