Mobile technologies and communication strategies in an urban Midwifery Group Practice setting. An exploratory study

Amanda Forti, Helen Stapleton, Sue Kildea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Around-the-clock access to a known midwife is a distinct feature of Midwifery Group Practice (MGP) and caseload midwifery settings; although the literature suggests this aspect of working life may hinder recruitment and retention to this model of care. Mobile technologies, known as mHealth where they are used in health care, facilitate access and hence communication, however little is known about this area of midwifery practice. Research question: Which communication modalities are used, and most frequently, by MGP midwives and clients? Methods: A prospective, cross sectional design included a purposive sample of MGP midwives from an Australian tertiary maternity hospital. Data on modes of midwife-client contact were collected 24. h/day, for two consecutive weeks, and included: visits, phone-calls, texts and emails. Demographic data were also collected. Findings: Details about 1442 midwife-client contacts were obtained. The majority of contact was via text, between the hours of 07:00 and 14:59, with primiparous women, when the primary midwife was on-call. An average of 96 contacts per fortnight occurred. Conclusion: The majority of contact was between the midwife and their primary clients, reiterating a key tenet of caseload models and confirming mobile technologies as a significant and evolving aspect of practice. The pattern of contact within social (or daytime) hours is reassuring for midwives considering caseload midwifery, who are concerned about the on-call burden. The use of text as the preferred communication modality raises issues regarding data security and retrieval, accountability, confidentiality and text management during off-duty periods. The development of Australian-wide guidelines to inform local policies and best practice is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-239
Number of pages5
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Group Practice
Midwifery
Communication
Technology
Computer Security
Maternity Hospitals
Telemedicine
Information Storage and Retrieval
Confidentiality
Social Responsibility
Practice Guidelines
Tertiary Care Centers

Cite this

@article{8e7d6b82fa054c45912a590b8b3a73a3,
title = "Mobile technologies and communication strategies in an urban Midwifery Group Practice setting. An exploratory study",
abstract = "Background: Around-the-clock access to a known midwife is a distinct feature of Midwifery Group Practice (MGP) and caseload midwifery settings; although the literature suggests this aspect of working life may hinder recruitment and retention to this model of care. Mobile technologies, known as mHealth where they are used in health care, facilitate access and hence communication, however little is known about this area of midwifery practice. Research question: Which communication modalities are used, and most frequently, by MGP midwives and clients? Methods: A prospective, cross sectional design included a purposive sample of MGP midwives from an Australian tertiary maternity hospital. Data on modes of midwife-client contact were collected 24. h/day, for two consecutive weeks, and included: visits, phone-calls, texts and emails. Demographic data were also collected. Findings: Details about 1442 midwife-client contacts were obtained. The majority of contact was via text, between the hours of 07:00 and 14:59, with primiparous women, when the primary midwife was on-call. An average of 96 contacts per fortnight occurred. Conclusion: The majority of contact was between the midwife and their primary clients, reiterating a key tenet of caseload models and confirming mobile technologies as a significant and evolving aspect of practice. The pattern of contact within social (or daytime) hours is reassuring for midwives considering caseload midwifery, who are concerned about the on-call burden. The use of text as the preferred communication modality raises issues regarding data security and retrieval, accountability, confidentiality and text management during off-duty periods. The development of Australian-wide guidelines to inform local policies and best practice is recommended.",
keywords = "Caseload, Continuity, Maternity, MGP, MHealth, Midwifery, SMS, Text messaging",
author = "Amanda Forti and Helen Stapleton and Sue Kildea",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2013.08.008",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "235--239",
journal = "Women and Birth",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Mobile technologies and communication strategies in an urban Midwifery Group Practice setting. An exploratory study. / Forti, Amanda; Stapleton, Helen; Kildea, Sue.

In: Women and Birth, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.12.2013, p. 235-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobile technologies and communication strategies in an urban Midwifery Group Practice setting. An exploratory study

AU - Forti, Amanda

AU - Stapleton, Helen

AU - Kildea, Sue

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Background: Around-the-clock access to a known midwife is a distinct feature of Midwifery Group Practice (MGP) and caseload midwifery settings; although the literature suggests this aspect of working life may hinder recruitment and retention to this model of care. Mobile technologies, known as mHealth where they are used in health care, facilitate access and hence communication, however little is known about this area of midwifery practice. Research question: Which communication modalities are used, and most frequently, by MGP midwives and clients? Methods: A prospective, cross sectional design included a purposive sample of MGP midwives from an Australian tertiary maternity hospital. Data on modes of midwife-client contact were collected 24. h/day, for two consecutive weeks, and included: visits, phone-calls, texts and emails. Demographic data were also collected. Findings: Details about 1442 midwife-client contacts were obtained. The majority of contact was via text, between the hours of 07:00 and 14:59, with primiparous women, when the primary midwife was on-call. An average of 96 contacts per fortnight occurred. Conclusion: The majority of contact was between the midwife and their primary clients, reiterating a key tenet of caseload models and confirming mobile technologies as a significant and evolving aspect of practice. The pattern of contact within social (or daytime) hours is reassuring for midwives considering caseload midwifery, who are concerned about the on-call burden. The use of text as the preferred communication modality raises issues regarding data security and retrieval, accountability, confidentiality and text management during off-duty periods. The development of Australian-wide guidelines to inform local policies and best practice is recommended.

AB - Background: Around-the-clock access to a known midwife is a distinct feature of Midwifery Group Practice (MGP) and caseload midwifery settings; although the literature suggests this aspect of working life may hinder recruitment and retention to this model of care. Mobile technologies, known as mHealth where they are used in health care, facilitate access and hence communication, however little is known about this area of midwifery practice. Research question: Which communication modalities are used, and most frequently, by MGP midwives and clients? Methods: A prospective, cross sectional design included a purposive sample of MGP midwives from an Australian tertiary maternity hospital. Data on modes of midwife-client contact were collected 24. h/day, for two consecutive weeks, and included: visits, phone-calls, texts and emails. Demographic data were also collected. Findings: Details about 1442 midwife-client contacts were obtained. The majority of contact was via text, between the hours of 07:00 and 14:59, with primiparous women, when the primary midwife was on-call. An average of 96 contacts per fortnight occurred. Conclusion: The majority of contact was between the midwife and their primary clients, reiterating a key tenet of caseload models and confirming mobile technologies as a significant and evolving aspect of practice. The pattern of contact within social (or daytime) hours is reassuring for midwives considering caseload midwifery, who are concerned about the on-call burden. The use of text as the preferred communication modality raises issues regarding data security and retrieval, accountability, confidentiality and text management during off-duty periods. The development of Australian-wide guidelines to inform local policies and best practice is recommended.

KW - Caseload

KW - Continuity

KW - Maternity

KW - MGP

KW - MHealth

KW - Midwifery

KW - SMS

KW - Text messaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888374288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 235

EP - 239

JO - Women and Birth

JF - Women and Birth

SN - 1871-5192

IS - 4

ER -