Multi-agency community engagement during disaster recovery

Lessons from two New Zealand earthquake events

David Johnston, Julia Becker, Douglas Paton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to look at the role of communityparticipation in reducing anxiety and trauma in communities during two NewZealand earthquakes: the 1987 Edgecumbe and 2003 Te Anau events and explore theeffectiveness of various approaches in providing information, reducing stress,and facilitating a recovery process.


Design/methodology/approach: The principle methods of data collection were semi‐structuredinterviews were undertaken between October 2006 and March 2007 with keyagencies and individuals involved in the response and comprehensive analysis ofpapers, reports and articles in newspapers. The research was undertaken priorto the 4 September 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand, andtherefore community recovery from these events are not discussed in this paper.


Findings: Effective survival and recovery from disasters depends notjust on people's abilities to cope with the physical impacts of the event, butalso on how the societal environment complements and supports the complex andprotracted processes of community recovery. Central to recovery is how societyorganises, mobilises and coordinates the diverse range of organizational andprofessional resources that can be called upon to assist recovery.


Originality/value: The paper offers insight into the effectiveness and benefitof incorporating of community participation in reducing anxiety and trauma incommunities during earthquakes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-268
Number of pages17
JournalDisaster Prevention & Management
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

earthquake event
Earthquakes
Disasters
New Zealand
disaster
natural disaster
trauma
event
Anxiety
anxiety
community
Newspapers
Aptitude
Wounds and Injuries
earthquake
newspaper
participation
local participation
methodology
ability

Cite this

@article{7ca7c3b4bdad4a3e8453f938a8335145,
title = "Multi-agency community engagement during disaster recovery: Lessons from two New Zealand earthquake events",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to look at the role of communityparticipation in reducing anxiety and trauma in communities during two NewZealand earthquakes: the 1987 Edgecumbe and 2003 Te Anau events and explore theeffectiveness of various approaches in providing information, reducing stress,and facilitating a recovery process.Design/methodology/approach: The principle methods of data collection were semi‐structuredinterviews were undertaken between October 2006 and March 2007 with keyagencies and individuals involved in the response and comprehensive analysis ofpapers, reports and articles in newspapers. The research was undertaken priorto the 4 September 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand, andtherefore community recovery from these events are not discussed in this paper.Findings: Effective survival and recovery from disasters depends notjust on people's abilities to cope with the physical impacts of the event, butalso on how the societal environment complements and supports the complex andprotracted processes of community recovery. Central to recovery is how societyorganises, mobilises and coordinates the diverse range of organizational andprofessional resources that can be called upon to assist recovery.Originality/value: The paper offers insight into the effectiveness and benefitof incorporating of community participation in reducing anxiety and trauma incommunities during earthquakes.",
author = "David Johnston and Julia Becker and Douglas Paton",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/09653561211220034",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "252--268",
journal = "Disaster Prevention & Management",
issn = "0961-1428",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

Multi-agency community engagement during disaster recovery : Lessons from two New Zealand earthquake events. / Johnston, David; Becker, Julia; Paton, Douglas.

In: Disaster Prevention & Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2012, p. 252-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-agency community engagement during disaster recovery

T2 - Lessons from two New Zealand earthquake events

AU - Johnston, David

AU - Becker, Julia

AU - Paton, Douglas

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to look at the role of communityparticipation in reducing anxiety and trauma in communities during two NewZealand earthquakes: the 1987 Edgecumbe and 2003 Te Anau events and explore theeffectiveness of various approaches in providing information, reducing stress,and facilitating a recovery process.Design/methodology/approach: The principle methods of data collection were semi‐structuredinterviews were undertaken between October 2006 and March 2007 with keyagencies and individuals involved in the response and comprehensive analysis ofpapers, reports and articles in newspapers. The research was undertaken priorto the 4 September 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand, andtherefore community recovery from these events are not discussed in this paper.Findings: Effective survival and recovery from disasters depends notjust on people's abilities to cope with the physical impacts of the event, butalso on how the societal environment complements and supports the complex andprotracted processes of community recovery. Central to recovery is how societyorganises, mobilises and coordinates the diverse range of organizational andprofessional resources that can be called upon to assist recovery.Originality/value: The paper offers insight into the effectiveness and benefitof incorporating of community participation in reducing anxiety and trauma incommunities during earthquakes.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to look at the role of communityparticipation in reducing anxiety and trauma in communities during two NewZealand earthquakes: the 1987 Edgecumbe and 2003 Te Anau events and explore theeffectiveness of various approaches in providing information, reducing stress,and facilitating a recovery process.Design/methodology/approach: The principle methods of data collection were semi‐structuredinterviews were undertaken between October 2006 and March 2007 with keyagencies and individuals involved in the response and comprehensive analysis ofpapers, reports and articles in newspapers. The research was undertaken priorto the 4 September 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand, andtherefore community recovery from these events are not discussed in this paper.Findings: Effective survival and recovery from disasters depends notjust on people's abilities to cope with the physical impacts of the event, butalso on how the societal environment complements and supports the complex andprotracted processes of community recovery. Central to recovery is how societyorganises, mobilises and coordinates the diverse range of organizational andprofessional resources that can be called upon to assist recovery.Originality/value: The paper offers insight into the effectiveness and benefitof incorporating of community participation in reducing anxiety and trauma incommunities during earthquakes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859922569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09653561211220034

DO - 10.1108/09653561211220034

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 252

EP - 268

JO - Disaster Prevention & Management

JF - Disaster Prevention & Management

SN - 0961-1428

IS - 2

ER -