National carbon model not sensitive to species, families and site characteristics in a young tropical reforestation project

Noel D. Preece, Penny van Oosterzee, Gabriela C. Hidrobo Unda, Michael J. Lawes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Reforestation and restoration offer critical contributions to addressing climate change and biodiversity decline. Enabling carbon credits to be derived from these activities is important for reforestation, particularly since reforestation does not come cheaply. Australia's Carbon Farming Initiative is a world-leading policy that allows carbon credits to be obtained by using published methods-based approaches. Here we apply two different approaches to a young mixed species reforestation project in the wet tropics of Queensland, Australia. One approach assesses carbon sequestration from published allometric equations requiring direct field measurements, and the other applies a national carbon accounting model, FullCAM. Using allometric equations, we found above-ground biomass was influenced significantly by family, species, size class, and the interaction of family and size class. Species in the family Proteaceae out-performed species in other families. Selection of species according to soil nutrient status could enhance growth rates, but if soil nutrients and species responses are not known, then a bet-hedging strategy using mixed species from a variety of families is probably the best option. For three year old forest plots, FullCAM modelled significantly more carbon mass of trees than published allometric models for mixed tropical forests, suggesting that FullCAM needs adjustment to more accurately reflect species, families, local conditions and small-scale sites. Current policy settings are at odds with the needs of carbon farmers, considering the importance of forests and landscape restoration in fighting climate change and biodiversity decline. Legislated national methods allowing the development of species-specific allometrics for small mixed plantations do not account for the costs of developing these allometrics, especially in markets that are marginal.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)115-124
    Number of pages10
    JournalForest Ecology and Management
    Volume392
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2017

    Fingerprint

    reforestation
    carbon markets
    carbon
    soil nutrients
    climate change
    biodiversity
    forest restoration
    Proteaceae
    landscape management
    mixed forests
    carbon sequestration
    aboveground biomass
    tropical forests
    Queensland
    soil nutrient
    tropics
    farming systems
    plantations
    farmers
    markets

    Cite this

    Preece, Noel D. ; van Oosterzee, Penny ; Hidrobo Unda, Gabriela C. ; Lawes, Michael J. / National carbon model not sensitive to species, families and site characteristics in a young tropical reforestation project. In: Forest Ecology and Management. 2017 ; Vol. 392. pp. 115-124.
    @article{5ce6e67d1e464162934b454d562ae085,
    title = "National carbon model not sensitive to species, families and site characteristics in a young tropical reforestation project",
    abstract = "Reforestation and restoration offer critical contributions to addressing climate change and biodiversity decline. Enabling carbon credits to be derived from these activities is important for reforestation, particularly since reforestation does not come cheaply. Australia's Carbon Farming Initiative is a world-leading policy that allows carbon credits to be obtained by using published methods-based approaches. Here we apply two different approaches to a young mixed species reforestation project in the wet tropics of Queensland, Australia. One approach assesses carbon sequestration from published allometric equations requiring direct field measurements, and the other applies a national carbon accounting model, FullCAM. Using allometric equations, we found above-ground biomass was influenced significantly by family, species, size class, and the interaction of family and size class. Species in the family Proteaceae out-performed species in other families. Selection of species according to soil nutrient status could enhance growth rates, but if soil nutrients and species responses are not known, then a bet-hedging strategy using mixed species from a variety of families is probably the best option. For three year old forest plots, FullCAM modelled significantly more carbon mass of trees than published allometric models for mixed tropical forests, suggesting that FullCAM needs adjustment to more accurately reflect species, families, local conditions and small-scale sites. Current policy settings are at odds with the needs of carbon farmers, considering the importance of forests and landscape restoration in fighting climate change and biodiversity decline. Legislated national methods allowing the development of species-specific allometrics for small mixed plantations do not account for the costs of developing these allometrics, especially in markets that are marginal.",
    keywords = "Allometrics, Carbon models, Functional traits, Proteaceae, Restoration",
    author = "Preece, {Noel D.} and {van Oosterzee}, Penny and {Hidrobo Unda}, {Gabriela C.} and Lawes, {Michael J.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "5",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.052",
    language = "English",
    volume = "392",
    pages = "115--124",
    journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
    issn = "0378-1127",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    National carbon model not sensitive to species, families and site characteristics in a young tropical reforestation project. / Preece, Noel D.; van Oosterzee, Penny; Hidrobo Unda, Gabriela C.; Lawes, Michael J.

    In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 392, 15.05.2017, p. 115-124.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - National carbon model not sensitive to species, families and site characteristics in a young tropical reforestation project

    AU - Preece, Noel D.

    AU - van Oosterzee, Penny

    AU - Hidrobo Unda, Gabriela C.

    AU - Lawes, Michael J.

    PY - 2017/5/15

    Y1 - 2017/5/15

    N2 - Reforestation and restoration offer critical contributions to addressing climate change and biodiversity decline. Enabling carbon credits to be derived from these activities is important for reforestation, particularly since reforestation does not come cheaply. Australia's Carbon Farming Initiative is a world-leading policy that allows carbon credits to be obtained by using published methods-based approaches. Here we apply two different approaches to a young mixed species reforestation project in the wet tropics of Queensland, Australia. One approach assesses carbon sequestration from published allometric equations requiring direct field measurements, and the other applies a national carbon accounting model, FullCAM. Using allometric equations, we found above-ground biomass was influenced significantly by family, species, size class, and the interaction of family and size class. Species in the family Proteaceae out-performed species in other families. Selection of species according to soil nutrient status could enhance growth rates, but if soil nutrients and species responses are not known, then a bet-hedging strategy using mixed species from a variety of families is probably the best option. For three year old forest plots, FullCAM modelled significantly more carbon mass of trees than published allometric models for mixed tropical forests, suggesting that FullCAM needs adjustment to more accurately reflect species, families, local conditions and small-scale sites. Current policy settings are at odds with the needs of carbon farmers, considering the importance of forests and landscape restoration in fighting climate change and biodiversity decline. Legislated national methods allowing the development of species-specific allometrics for small mixed plantations do not account for the costs of developing these allometrics, especially in markets that are marginal.

    AB - Reforestation and restoration offer critical contributions to addressing climate change and biodiversity decline. Enabling carbon credits to be derived from these activities is important for reforestation, particularly since reforestation does not come cheaply. Australia's Carbon Farming Initiative is a world-leading policy that allows carbon credits to be obtained by using published methods-based approaches. Here we apply two different approaches to a young mixed species reforestation project in the wet tropics of Queensland, Australia. One approach assesses carbon sequestration from published allometric equations requiring direct field measurements, and the other applies a national carbon accounting model, FullCAM. Using allometric equations, we found above-ground biomass was influenced significantly by family, species, size class, and the interaction of family and size class. Species in the family Proteaceae out-performed species in other families. Selection of species according to soil nutrient status could enhance growth rates, but if soil nutrients and species responses are not known, then a bet-hedging strategy using mixed species from a variety of families is probably the best option. For three year old forest plots, FullCAM modelled significantly more carbon mass of trees than published allometric models for mixed tropical forests, suggesting that FullCAM needs adjustment to more accurately reflect species, families, local conditions and small-scale sites. Current policy settings are at odds with the needs of carbon farmers, considering the importance of forests and landscape restoration in fighting climate change and biodiversity decline. Legislated national methods allowing the development of species-specific allometrics for small mixed plantations do not account for the costs of developing these allometrics, especially in markets that are marginal.

    KW - Allometrics

    KW - Carbon models

    KW - Functional traits

    KW - Proteaceae

    KW - Restoration

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014764114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.052

    DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.052

    M3 - Article

    VL - 392

    SP - 115

    EP - 124

    JO - Forest Ecology and Management

    JF - Forest Ecology and Management

    SN - 0378-1127

    ER -