Neocolonial Conservation: Is Moving Rhinos to Australia Conservation or Intellectual Property Loss

Matt W Hayward, William J. Ripple, Graham I H Kerley, Marietjie Landman, Roan D. Plotz, Stephen T. Garnett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Australian Rhino Project (http://www.theaustralianrhinoproject.org) proposes importing 80 rhinos from South Africa to Australia by 2019 at a cost of over $US4 million, with the first six due to have been moved in 2016. This project has high-profile supporters in the private sector, zoos, and both governments, and is gaining major publicity through association with sporting teams and TedEx talks (http://www.theaustralianrhinoproject.org/index.php/news/blogs/11-news-and-blogs/242-ray-tedx). However, establishing extralimital populations of African rhinos is a very low-priority conservation action, particularly given over 800 are already in captivity, and we argue this project diverts funds and expertise away from more important conservation activities; the proposed captive conditions will lead to selection for domestic traits; the most likely species involved is the white rhino, which is the lowest priority rhino species for conservation; it removes a driver of in situ conservation; it does not focus on the critically endangered Asian rhino species; and it extends the historical exploitation of Africa's resources by colonial powers. There are also insufficient details in the public domain about the project for objective decision-making. We believe this is misdirected neocolonial conservation and the policy support from both governments for this project should be reconsidered.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12354
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalConservation Letters
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neocolonial Conservation: Is Moving Rhinos to Australia Conservation or Intellectual Property Loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this