Nurse academics perceptions of the efficacy of the OSCA tool

Stephane Bouchoucha, Anna Wikander, Catherine Wilkin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination/Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCE/OSCA) has been well documented. How assessors currently view the process, and if the OSCA tool still fulfils the assessment requirements, is unclear. In this study, the beliefs and expectations of assessors towards the assessment tool used in an undergraduate nursing degree to assess clinical skills was investigated. A cross-sectional study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 16 lecturers in nursing from a rural Australian university. This represents 65% of the total nurse academic staff employed there. The key issues that the academic staff raised reflect those from previous studies, such as the use of OSCA as formative assessment or a quality check process before the clinical practice. The OSCAs were seen as a good assessment tool, which gave students the opportunity to receive feedback on their performance in relation to clinical skills. The drawbacks identified in relation to the use of OSCAs were that the OSCA was seen as stressful to students. This drawback was thought to be further compounded if there was a lack of congruence regarding essential criteria between assessors. If not adequately addressed these drawbacks will erode the potential the OSCA tool has to foster uniformity, which was one of the main reasons for its implementation. 

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)95-100
    Number of pages6
    JournalCollegian
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

    Fingerprint

    Clinical Competence
    Rural Nursing
    Nurses
    Students
    Focus Groups
    Nursing
    Cross-Sectional Studies
    Interviews

    Cite this

    Bouchoucha, Stephane ; Wikander, Anna ; Wilkin, Catherine. / Nurse academics perceptions of the efficacy of the OSCA tool. In: Collegian. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 95-100.
    @article{e9789f3c56fd46f9afdc4a2c0a640425,
    title = "Nurse academics perceptions of the efficacy of the OSCA tool",
    abstract = "The use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination/Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCE/OSCA) has been well documented. How assessors currently view the process, and if the OSCA tool still fulfils the assessment requirements, is unclear. In this study, the beliefs and expectations of assessors towards the assessment tool used in an undergraduate nursing degree to assess clinical skills was investigated. A cross-sectional study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 16 lecturers in nursing from a rural Australian university. This represents 65{\%} of the total nurse academic staff employed there. The key issues that the academic staff raised reflect those from previous studies, such as the use of OSCA as formative assessment or a quality check process before the clinical practice. The OSCAs were seen as a good assessment tool, which gave students the opportunity to receive feedback on their performance in relation to clinical skills. The drawbacks identified in relation to the use of OSCAs were that the OSCA was seen as stressful to students. This drawback was thought to be further compounded if there was a lack of congruence regarding essential criteria between assessors. If not adequately addressed these drawbacks will erode the potential the OSCA tool has to foster uniformity, which was one of the main reasons for its implementation. ",
    keywords = "article, attitude, Australia, clinical competence, cross-sectional study, education, human, information processing, methodology, nursing education, Attitude, Clinical Competence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Nursing, Educational Measurement, Faculty, Nursing, Focus Groups, Humans",
    author = "Stephane Bouchoucha and Anna Wikander and Catherine Wilkin",
    year = "2013",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.colegn.2012.03.008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "95--100",
    journal = "Collegian",
    issn = "1322-7696",
    publisher = "Informit",
    number = "2",

    }

    Nurse academics perceptions of the efficacy of the OSCA tool. / Bouchoucha, Stephane; Wikander, Anna; Wilkin, Catherine.

    In: Collegian, Vol. 20, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 95-100.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Nurse academics perceptions of the efficacy of the OSCA tool

    AU - Bouchoucha, Stephane

    AU - Wikander, Anna

    AU - Wilkin, Catherine

    PY - 2013/6

    Y1 - 2013/6

    N2 - The use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination/Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCE/OSCA) has been well documented. How assessors currently view the process, and if the OSCA tool still fulfils the assessment requirements, is unclear. In this study, the beliefs and expectations of assessors towards the assessment tool used in an undergraduate nursing degree to assess clinical skills was investigated. A cross-sectional study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 16 lecturers in nursing from a rural Australian university. This represents 65% of the total nurse academic staff employed there. The key issues that the academic staff raised reflect those from previous studies, such as the use of OSCA as formative assessment or a quality check process before the clinical practice. The OSCAs were seen as a good assessment tool, which gave students the opportunity to receive feedback on their performance in relation to clinical skills. The drawbacks identified in relation to the use of OSCAs were that the OSCA was seen as stressful to students. This drawback was thought to be further compounded if there was a lack of congruence regarding essential criteria between assessors. If not adequately addressed these drawbacks will erode the potential the OSCA tool has to foster uniformity, which was one of the main reasons for its implementation. 

    AB - The use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination/Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (OSCE/OSCA) has been well documented. How assessors currently view the process, and if the OSCA tool still fulfils the assessment requirements, is unclear. In this study, the beliefs and expectations of assessors towards the assessment tool used in an undergraduate nursing degree to assess clinical skills was investigated. A cross-sectional study used semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 16 lecturers in nursing from a rural Australian university. This represents 65% of the total nurse academic staff employed there. The key issues that the academic staff raised reflect those from previous studies, such as the use of OSCA as formative assessment or a quality check process before the clinical practice. The OSCAs were seen as a good assessment tool, which gave students the opportunity to receive feedback on their performance in relation to clinical skills. The drawbacks identified in relation to the use of OSCAs were that the OSCA was seen as stressful to students. This drawback was thought to be further compounded if there was a lack of congruence regarding essential criteria between assessors. If not adequately addressed these drawbacks will erode the potential the OSCA tool has to foster uniformity, which was one of the main reasons for its implementation. 

    KW - article

    KW - attitude

    KW - Australia

    KW - clinical competence

    KW - cross-sectional study

    KW - education

    KW - human

    KW - information processing

    KW - methodology

    KW - nursing education

    KW - Attitude

    KW - Clinical Competence

    KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

    KW - Education, Nursing

    KW - Educational Measurement

    KW - Faculty, Nursing

    KW - Focus Groups

    KW - Humans

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877593760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.colegn.2012.03.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.colegn.2012.03.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 95

    EP - 100

    JO - Collegian

    JF - Collegian

    SN - 1322-7696

    IS - 2

    ER -