Optimal investment in conservation of species

Michael McCarthy, C THOMPSON, Stephen Garnett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    1. Factors that have been considered when deciding how to invest resources in conservation of species include the efficacy and cost of management, the importance of the species, the level of threat, and the timeframe over which results are to be achieved. However, it is unclear how each of these different factors should be weighted and combined when making a decision. 2. We examine how the probabilities of species changing in IUCN Red List categories are influenced by expenditure of resources. We use these relationships to determine optimal investment strategies, using Australian birds as a case study. 3. The optimal level of investment in different species depends critically on whether managers wish to minimize the number of extinct species or a weighted average of all threatened species, and on the available budget. The level of investment should not necessarily reflect the level of threat. In our case study, the timeframe of management had little influence on the investment decision. 4. Our results show that extinctions of Australian birds can be largely avoided over the next 80 years given current expenditure, but greater investment in conservation is required to reduce the number of threatened species. 5. Synthesis and applications. The most efficient allocation of resources to conserve species is difficult to determine intuitively; therefore, this decision demands the use of formal decision theory. The influence of the particular management objective on the optimal decision means that this feature needs careful consideration. Our approach can be used to determine the level of investment that is required to reduce the number of threatened species. � 2008 The Authors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1428-1435
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
    Volume45
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    expenditure
    resource
    bird
    Red List
    conservation of species
    extinction
    decision
    cost
    budget
    allocation

    Cite this

    McCarthy, Michael ; THOMPSON, C ; Garnett, Stephen. / Optimal investment in conservation of species. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2008 ; Vol. 45, No. 5. pp. 1428-1435.
    @article{7eee7ff4172a422088556859d212d072,
    title = "Optimal investment in conservation of species",
    abstract = "1. Factors that have been considered when deciding how to invest resources in conservation of species include the efficacy and cost of management, the importance of the species, the level of threat, and the timeframe over which results are to be achieved. However, it is unclear how each of these different factors should be weighted and combined when making a decision. 2. We examine how the probabilities of species changing in IUCN Red List categories are influenced by expenditure of resources. We use these relationships to determine optimal investment strategies, using Australian birds as a case study. 3. The optimal level of investment in different species depends critically on whether managers wish to minimize the number of extinct species or a weighted average of all threatened species, and on the available budget. The level of investment should not necessarily reflect the level of threat. In our case study, the timeframe of management had little influence on the investment decision. 4. Our results show that extinctions of Australian birds can be largely avoided over the next 80 years given current expenditure, but greater investment in conservation is required to reduce the number of threatened species. 5. Synthesis and applications. The most efficient allocation of resources to conserve species is difficult to determine intuitively; therefore, this decision demands the use of formal decision theory. The influence of the particular management objective on the optimal decision means that this feature needs careful consideration. Our approach can be used to determine the level of investment that is required to reduce the number of threatened species. � 2008 The Authors.",
    keywords = "bird, conservation status, cost-benefit analysis, decision analysis, decision making, extinction, investment, Red List, resource management, risk assessment, species conservation, Australasia, Australia, Aves",
    author = "Michael McCarthy and C THOMPSON and Stephen Garnett",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "45",
    pages = "1428--1435",
    journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
    issn = "0021-8901",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "5",

    }

    McCarthy, M, THOMPSON, C & Garnett, S 2008, 'Optimal investment in conservation of species', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1428-1435.

    Optimal investment in conservation of species. / McCarthy, Michael; THOMPSON, C; Garnett, Stephen.

    In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2008, p. 1428-1435.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Optimal investment in conservation of species

    AU - McCarthy, Michael

    AU - THOMPSON, C

    AU - Garnett, Stephen

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - 1. Factors that have been considered when deciding how to invest resources in conservation of species include the efficacy and cost of management, the importance of the species, the level of threat, and the timeframe over which results are to be achieved. However, it is unclear how each of these different factors should be weighted and combined when making a decision. 2. We examine how the probabilities of species changing in IUCN Red List categories are influenced by expenditure of resources. We use these relationships to determine optimal investment strategies, using Australian birds as a case study. 3. The optimal level of investment in different species depends critically on whether managers wish to minimize the number of extinct species or a weighted average of all threatened species, and on the available budget. The level of investment should not necessarily reflect the level of threat. In our case study, the timeframe of management had little influence on the investment decision. 4. Our results show that extinctions of Australian birds can be largely avoided over the next 80 years given current expenditure, but greater investment in conservation is required to reduce the number of threatened species. 5. Synthesis and applications. The most efficient allocation of resources to conserve species is difficult to determine intuitively; therefore, this decision demands the use of formal decision theory. The influence of the particular management objective on the optimal decision means that this feature needs careful consideration. Our approach can be used to determine the level of investment that is required to reduce the number of threatened species. � 2008 The Authors.

    AB - 1. Factors that have been considered when deciding how to invest resources in conservation of species include the efficacy and cost of management, the importance of the species, the level of threat, and the timeframe over which results are to be achieved. However, it is unclear how each of these different factors should be weighted and combined when making a decision. 2. We examine how the probabilities of species changing in IUCN Red List categories are influenced by expenditure of resources. We use these relationships to determine optimal investment strategies, using Australian birds as a case study. 3. The optimal level of investment in different species depends critically on whether managers wish to minimize the number of extinct species or a weighted average of all threatened species, and on the available budget. The level of investment should not necessarily reflect the level of threat. In our case study, the timeframe of management had little influence on the investment decision. 4. Our results show that extinctions of Australian birds can be largely avoided over the next 80 years given current expenditure, but greater investment in conservation is required to reduce the number of threatened species. 5. Synthesis and applications. The most efficient allocation of resources to conserve species is difficult to determine intuitively; therefore, this decision demands the use of formal decision theory. The influence of the particular management objective on the optimal decision means that this feature needs careful consideration. Our approach can be used to determine the level of investment that is required to reduce the number of threatened species. � 2008 The Authors.

    KW - bird

    KW - conservation status

    KW - cost-benefit analysis

    KW - decision analysis

    KW - decision making

    KW - extinction

    KW - investment

    KW - Red List

    KW - resource management

    KW - risk assessment

    KW - species conservation

    KW - Australasia

    KW - Australia

    KW - Aves

    M3 - Article

    VL - 45

    SP - 1428

    EP - 1435

    JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

    JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

    SN - 0021-8901

    IS - 5

    ER -