Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic

Researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent-school engagement in north Australia

Tess Lea, Helen Thompson, Eva McRae-Williams, Agathe Wegner

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    15 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    'Engagement' is the second of six top priorities in Australia's most recent Indigenous education strategy to 'close the gap' in schooling outcomes. Drawing on findings from a three-year ethnographic analysis of school engagement issues in the north of Australia, this article situates engagement within the history of Indigenous education policy, followed by considerations of how many of the issues faced by Indigenous families both match and can be distinguished from those experienced among poor and underemployed social groups throughout the western world. We find that Indigenous people are content with the schools' engagement efforts and with their interactions with schools, accepting that how their lives are lived are not within the provenance of the school system to amend. In its homogenisation of Indigenous issues, reification of cultural distinction and foregrounding of disengagement as an issue, Australian education policy is also about non-engagement, in that it excludes key issues from policy consideration while appearing to be inclusive. The education sector does not systematically engage with the grinding issues that Indigenous families face in their everyday worlds; and since Indigenous people do not really expect schools to know how to solve their issues, the call for engagement and its resolution is perfectly irresolvable. 
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)321-339
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Education Policy
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2011

    Fingerprint

    logic
    parents
    school
    education
    reification
    disengagement
    Western world
    know how
    school system
    history
    interaction

    Cite this

    @article{ba80c4611d90400fa494b1da15e1d3c6,
    title = "Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic: Researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent-school engagement in north Australia",
    abstract = "'Engagement' is the second of six top priorities in Australia's most recent Indigenous education strategy to 'close the gap' in schooling outcomes. Drawing on findings from a three-year ethnographic analysis of school engagement issues in the north of Australia, this article situates engagement within the history of Indigenous education policy, followed by considerations of how many of the issues faced by Indigenous families both match and can be distinguished from those experienced among poor and underemployed social groups throughout the western world. We find that Indigenous people are content with the schools' engagement efforts and with their interactions with schools, accepting that how their lives are lived are not within the provenance of the school system to amend. In its homogenisation of Indigenous issues, reification of cultural distinction and foregrounding of disengagement as an issue, Australian education policy is also about non-engagement, in that it excludes key issues from policy consideration while appearing to be inclusive. The education sector does not systematically engage with the grinding issues that Indigenous families face in their everyday worlds; and since Indigenous people do not really expect schools to know how to solve their issues, the call for engagement and its resolution is perfectly irresolvable. ",
    author = "Tess Lea and Helen Thompson and Eva McRae-Williams and Agathe Wegner",
    year = "2011",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/02680939.2010.509813",
    language = "English",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "321--339",
    journal = "Journal of Education Policy",
    issn = "0268-0939",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic : Researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent-school engagement in north Australia. / Lea, Tess; Thompson, Helen; McRae-Williams, Eva; Wegner, Agathe.

    In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.05.2011, p. 321-339.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic

    T2 - Researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent-school engagement in north Australia

    AU - Lea, Tess

    AU - Thompson, Helen

    AU - McRae-Williams, Eva

    AU - Wegner, Agathe

    PY - 2011/5/1

    Y1 - 2011/5/1

    N2 - 'Engagement' is the second of six top priorities in Australia's most recent Indigenous education strategy to 'close the gap' in schooling outcomes. Drawing on findings from a three-year ethnographic analysis of school engagement issues in the north of Australia, this article situates engagement within the history of Indigenous education policy, followed by considerations of how many of the issues faced by Indigenous families both match and can be distinguished from those experienced among poor and underemployed social groups throughout the western world. We find that Indigenous people are content with the schools' engagement efforts and with their interactions with schools, accepting that how their lives are lived are not within the provenance of the school system to amend. In its homogenisation of Indigenous issues, reification of cultural distinction and foregrounding of disengagement as an issue, Australian education policy is also about non-engagement, in that it excludes key issues from policy consideration while appearing to be inclusive. The education sector does not systematically engage with the grinding issues that Indigenous families face in their everyday worlds; and since Indigenous people do not really expect schools to know how to solve their issues, the call for engagement and its resolution is perfectly irresolvable. 

    AB - 'Engagement' is the second of six top priorities in Australia's most recent Indigenous education strategy to 'close the gap' in schooling outcomes. Drawing on findings from a three-year ethnographic analysis of school engagement issues in the north of Australia, this article situates engagement within the history of Indigenous education policy, followed by considerations of how many of the issues faced by Indigenous families both match and can be distinguished from those experienced among poor and underemployed social groups throughout the western world. We find that Indigenous people are content with the schools' engagement efforts and with their interactions with schools, accepting that how their lives are lived are not within the provenance of the school system to amend. In its homogenisation of Indigenous issues, reification of cultural distinction and foregrounding of disengagement as an issue, Australian education policy is also about non-engagement, in that it excludes key issues from policy consideration while appearing to be inclusive. The education sector does not systematically engage with the grinding issues that Indigenous families face in their everyday worlds; and since Indigenous people do not really expect schools to know how to solve their issues, the call for engagement and its resolution is perfectly irresolvable. 

    U2 - 10.1080/02680939.2010.509813

    DO - 10.1080/02680939.2010.509813

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 321

    EP - 339

    JO - Journal of Education Policy

    JF - Journal of Education Policy

    SN - 0268-0939

    IS - 3

    ER -