Pursuing Social Justice Through Collaborative Archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia

C. Smith, H. Burke, J. Ralph, K. Pollard, A. Gorman, C. Wilson, S. Hemming, D. Rigney, D. Wesley, M. Morrison, D. McNaughton, I. Domingo, I. Moffat, A. Roberts, J. Koolmatrie, J. Willika, B. Pamkal, G. Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper identifies the emergence of the pursuit of social justice as a core focus of collaborative archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia. A wide range of case studies are examined, especially in relation to efforts to redress a ‘deep colonisation’ that silences Indigenous histories and fails to engage with Indigenous voices or experiences. This research is part of a wider global movement of community-based, activist and engaged archaeology that encompasses two principle approaches to social justice: the redistribution of resources and goods and the politics of recognition. It is informed by a more general concern with human rights, structural violence and ethical globalisation. In Australia, social justice archaeologies are both confronting, in terms of frontier violence, intentional structural violence and racism, but also inspirational/aspirational, in terms of Aboriginal nation building and the cultural facilitation of Aboriginal research ethics. The development of collaborative projects between Indigenous peoples and (Indigenous and non-Indigenous) archaeologists can be challenging. Indigenous archaeologists face particular challenges, including balancing sometimes conflicting expectations from communities with the demands of the profession. For non-Indigenous archaeologists, the challenge lies in the shift from working with Indigenous peoples to working for Indigenous peoples as part of a process in which social justice outcomes are a product, rather than a by-product, of archaeological research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-569
Number of pages34
JournalArchaeologies
Volume15
Issue number3
Early online date30 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Indigenous Peoples
Archaeologists
Redistribution
Facilitation
Archaeological Research
Activists
Politics of Recognition
Racism
Archaeology
Colonization
Nation-building
Human Rights
History
Resources
Pursuit
Research Ethics
Collaborative Projects
Globalization

Cite this

Smith, C., Burke, H., Ralph, J., Pollard, K., Gorman, A., Wilson, C., ... Jackson, G. (2019). Pursuing Social Justice Through Collaborative Archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia. Archaeologies, 15(3), 536-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-019-09382-7
Smith, C. ; Burke, H. ; Ralph, J. ; Pollard, K. ; Gorman, A. ; Wilson, C. ; Hemming, S. ; Rigney, D. ; Wesley, D. ; Morrison, M. ; McNaughton, D. ; Domingo, I. ; Moffat, I. ; Roberts, A. ; Koolmatrie, J. ; Willika, J. ; Pamkal, B. ; Jackson, G. / Pursuing Social Justice Through Collaborative Archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia. In: Archaeologies. 2019 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 536-569.
@article{8a279416940c49a9912038906c9009d1,
title = "Pursuing Social Justice Through Collaborative Archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia",
abstract = "This paper identifies the emergence of the pursuit of social justice as a core focus of collaborative archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia. A wide range of case studies are examined, especially in relation to efforts to redress a ‘deep colonisation’ that silences Indigenous histories and fails to engage with Indigenous voices or experiences. This research is part of a wider global movement of community-based, activist and engaged archaeology that encompasses two principle approaches to social justice: the redistribution of resources and goods and the politics of recognition. It is informed by a more general concern with human rights, structural violence and ethical globalisation. In Australia, social justice archaeologies are both confronting, in terms of frontier violence, intentional structural violence and racism, but also inspirational/aspirational, in terms of Aboriginal nation building and the cultural facilitation of Aboriginal research ethics. The development of collaborative projects between Indigenous peoples and (Indigenous and non-Indigenous) archaeologists can be challenging. Indigenous archaeologists face particular challenges, including balancing sometimes conflicting expectations from communities with the demands of the profession. For non-Indigenous archaeologists, the challenge lies in the shift from working with Indigenous peoples to working for Indigenous peoples as part of a process in which social justice outcomes are a product, rather than a by-product, of archaeological research.",
keywords = "Aboriginal Australia, Collaborative archaeologies, Everyday racism, Indigenous archaeology, Social justice, Structural violence",
author = "C. Smith and H. Burke and J. Ralph and K. Pollard and A. Gorman and C. Wilson and S. Hemming and D. Rigney and D. Wesley and M. Morrison and D. McNaughton and I. Domingo and I. Moffat and A. Roberts and J. Koolmatrie and J. Willika and B. Pamkal and G. Jackson",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11759-019-09382-7",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "536--569",
journal = "Archaeologies: journal of the World Archaeological Congress",
issn = "1555-8622",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Smith, C, Burke, H, Ralph, J, Pollard, K, Gorman, A, Wilson, C, Hemming, S, Rigney, D, Wesley, D, Morrison, M, McNaughton, D, Domingo, I, Moffat, I, Roberts, A, Koolmatrie, J, Willika, J, Pamkal, B & Jackson, G 2019, 'Pursuing Social Justice Through Collaborative Archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia', Archaeologies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 536-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-019-09382-7

Pursuing Social Justice Through Collaborative Archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia. / Smith, C.; Burke, H.; Ralph, J.; Pollard, K.; Gorman, A.; Wilson, C.; Hemming, S.; Rigney, D.; Wesley, D.; Morrison, M.; McNaughton, D.; Domingo, I.; Moffat, I.; Roberts, A.; Koolmatrie, J.; Willika, J.; Pamkal, B.; Jackson, G.

In: Archaeologies, Vol. 15, No. 3, 12.2019, p. 536-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pursuing Social Justice Through Collaborative Archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia

AU - Smith, C.

AU - Burke, H.

AU - Ralph, J.

AU - Pollard, K.

AU - Gorman, A.

AU - Wilson, C.

AU - Hemming, S.

AU - Rigney, D.

AU - Wesley, D.

AU - Morrison, M.

AU - McNaughton, D.

AU - Domingo, I.

AU - Moffat, I.

AU - Roberts, A.

AU - Koolmatrie, J.

AU - Willika, J.

AU - Pamkal, B.

AU - Jackson, G.

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - This paper identifies the emergence of the pursuit of social justice as a core focus of collaborative archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia. A wide range of case studies are examined, especially in relation to efforts to redress a ‘deep colonisation’ that silences Indigenous histories and fails to engage with Indigenous voices or experiences. This research is part of a wider global movement of community-based, activist and engaged archaeology that encompasses two principle approaches to social justice: the redistribution of resources and goods and the politics of recognition. It is informed by a more general concern with human rights, structural violence and ethical globalisation. In Australia, social justice archaeologies are both confronting, in terms of frontier violence, intentional structural violence and racism, but also inspirational/aspirational, in terms of Aboriginal nation building and the cultural facilitation of Aboriginal research ethics. The development of collaborative projects between Indigenous peoples and (Indigenous and non-Indigenous) archaeologists can be challenging. Indigenous archaeologists face particular challenges, including balancing sometimes conflicting expectations from communities with the demands of the profession. For non-Indigenous archaeologists, the challenge lies in the shift from working with Indigenous peoples to working for Indigenous peoples as part of a process in which social justice outcomes are a product, rather than a by-product, of archaeological research.

AB - This paper identifies the emergence of the pursuit of social justice as a core focus of collaborative archaeologies in Aboriginal Australia. A wide range of case studies are examined, especially in relation to efforts to redress a ‘deep colonisation’ that silences Indigenous histories and fails to engage with Indigenous voices or experiences. This research is part of a wider global movement of community-based, activist and engaged archaeology that encompasses two principle approaches to social justice: the redistribution of resources and goods and the politics of recognition. It is informed by a more general concern with human rights, structural violence and ethical globalisation. In Australia, social justice archaeologies are both confronting, in terms of frontier violence, intentional structural violence and racism, but also inspirational/aspirational, in terms of Aboriginal nation building and the cultural facilitation of Aboriginal research ethics. The development of collaborative projects between Indigenous peoples and (Indigenous and non-Indigenous) archaeologists can be challenging. Indigenous archaeologists face particular challenges, including balancing sometimes conflicting expectations from communities with the demands of the profession. For non-Indigenous archaeologists, the challenge lies in the shift from working with Indigenous peoples to working for Indigenous peoples as part of a process in which social justice outcomes are a product, rather than a by-product, of archaeological research.

KW - Aboriginal Australia

KW - Collaborative archaeologies

KW - Everyday racism

KW - Indigenous archaeology

KW - Social justice

KW - Structural violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074134773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11759-019-09382-7

DO - 10.1007/s11759-019-09382-7

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 536

EP - 569

JO - Archaeologies: journal of the World Archaeological Congress

JF - Archaeologies: journal of the World Archaeological Congress

SN - 1555-8622

IS - 3

ER -