Quantifying catastrophic and climate impacted hazards based on local expert opinions

Tim Keighley, Thomas Longden, Supriya Mathew, Stefan Trück

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Quantifying the potential costs of catastrophic and climate impacted hazards is a challenging but important exercise as the occurrence of such events is usually associated with high damage and uncertainty. At the local level, there is often a lack of information on rare extreme events, which means that the available data is not sufficient to fit a distribution and derive parameter values for frequency and severity distributions. This paper discusses the use of local assessments of extreme events and utilises expert elicitation in order to obtain values for distribution parameters that will feed into management decisions with regards to quantifying catastrophic risks. We illustrate a simple approach, where a local expert is required to only specify two percentiles of the loss distribution in order to provide an estimate for the severity distribution of climate impacted hazards. In our approach we use heavy-tailed distributions to capture the severity of events. Our method allows local government decision makers to focus on extreme losses and the tail of the distribution. An illustration of the method is provided utilising an example that quantifies property losses from bushfires for a local area in northern Sydney. We further illustrate how key variables, such as discount rates, assumptions about climatic change and adaptation measures, will impact the estimates of losses.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)262-273
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Environmental Management
    Volume205
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying catastrophic and climate impacted hazards based on local expert opinions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this