Abstract
The argument that the decision in Re Kevin is fundamentally flawed at law because the persuasive judgement of Corbett v Corbett was not followed - breaches Anti-Discrimination laws and International Human Rights - definition of male and female is archaic - same sex marriages should be recognised.
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 364-371 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Southern Cross University Law Review |
| Volume | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |