Reflections on four decades of land restoration in Australia

Colin Campbell, Jason Alexandra, David Curtis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The past four decades have seen a transformative process in Australian agriculture – the gradual incorporation of conservation practices such as ecological restoration, revegetation and agroforestry as a response to land degradation. Although actions have been impressive they remain fragmented, are confined to particular districts or properties and run the risk of not being built upon in the future. This paper traces the history of this movement and draws out lessons and implications for future policy development and research.
    Landscape-scale restoration and the integration of conservation into farming landscapes have been recognised as a global imperative for decades, for which Australia has generated many innovations – in the technical, social and policy domains. Scanning the ‘big picture’, we identify many pixels of best practice in policy, incentives, planning, regulation and on-ground practice. We wonder why we have not pulled these together, to work in concert over time. If we had, Australia would have a world’s best natural resource management framework. However, we have neither integrated these elements at multiple scales nor sustained them. Unfortunately, although we are excellent at innovating, we have been equally good at forgetting. Progress remains partial, patchy and slow. Too often, we have made gains then gone backwards, reflecting a tendency towards policy adhockery and amnesia. With Australia’s continuing depreciation of institutional memory, we risk losing critical capabilities for making sound policy decisions.
    Australian expertise in revegetation, restoration and regeneration of landscapes remains formidable however, with an enormous amount to offer the world. We are still learning to live and farm more sustainably, but we have made big strides over the last four decades. The challenge will be to maintain the momentum and provide adequate succession so future generations continue the work.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)405-416
    Number of pages12
    JournalRangeland Journal
    Volume39
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2017

    Fingerprint

    land restoration
    revegetation
    research policy
    development policy
    land degradation
    conservation practices
    ecological restoration
    momentum
    natural resource management
    agroforestry
    research and development
    policy development
    resource management
    incentive
    pixel
    natural resource
    innovation
    learning
    farming systems
    regeneration

    Cite this

    Campbell, Colin ; Alexandra, Jason ; Curtis, David . / Reflections on four decades of land restoration in Australia. In: Rangeland Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 405-416.
    @article{25063c083923446882812f34c89ea686,
    title = "Reflections on four decades of land restoration in Australia",
    abstract = "The past four decades have seen a transformative process in Australian agriculture – the gradual incorporation of conservation practices such as ecological restoration, revegetation and agroforestry as a response to land degradation. Although actions have been impressive they remain fragmented, are confined to particular districts or properties and run the risk of not being built upon in the future. This paper traces the history of this movement and draws out lessons and implications for future policy development and research.Landscape-scale restoration and the integration of conservation into farming landscapes have been recognised as a global imperative for decades, for which Australia has generated many innovations – in the technical, social and policy domains. Scanning the ‘big picture’, we identify many pixels of best practice in policy, incentives, planning, regulation and on-ground practice. We wonder why we have not pulled these together, to work in concert over time. If we had, Australia would have a world’s best natural resource management framework. However, we have neither integrated these elements at multiple scales nor sustained them. Unfortunately, although we are excellent at innovating, we have been equally good at forgetting. Progress remains partial, patchy and slow. Too often, we have made gains then gone backwards, reflecting a tendency towards policy adhockery and amnesia. With Australia’s continuing depreciation of institutional memory, we risk losing critical capabilities for making sound policy decisions.Australian expertise in revegetation, restoration and regeneration of landscapes remains formidable however, with an enormous amount to offer the world. We are still learning to live and farm more sustainably, but we have made big strides over the last four decades. The challenge will be to maintain the momentum and provide adequate succession so future generations continue the work.",
    author = "Colin Campbell and Jason Alexandra and David Curtis",
    year = "2017",
    month = "8",
    day = "22",
    doi = "10.1071/RJ17056",
    language = "English",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "405--416",
    journal = "The Rangeland Journal",
    issn = "1036-9872",
    publisher = "CSIRO Publishing",
    number = "6",

    }

    Campbell, C, Alexandra, J & Curtis, D 2017, 'Reflections on four decades of land restoration in Australia', Rangeland Journal, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ17056

    Reflections on four decades of land restoration in Australia. / Campbell, Colin; Alexandra, Jason; Curtis, David .

    In: Rangeland Journal, Vol. 39, No. 6, 22.08.2017, p. 405-416.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Reflections on four decades of land restoration in Australia

    AU - Campbell, Colin

    AU - Alexandra, Jason

    AU - Curtis, David

    PY - 2017/8/22

    Y1 - 2017/8/22

    N2 - The past four decades have seen a transformative process in Australian agriculture – the gradual incorporation of conservation practices such as ecological restoration, revegetation and agroforestry as a response to land degradation. Although actions have been impressive they remain fragmented, are confined to particular districts or properties and run the risk of not being built upon in the future. This paper traces the history of this movement and draws out lessons and implications for future policy development and research.Landscape-scale restoration and the integration of conservation into farming landscapes have been recognised as a global imperative for decades, for which Australia has generated many innovations – in the technical, social and policy domains. Scanning the ‘big picture’, we identify many pixels of best practice in policy, incentives, planning, regulation and on-ground practice. We wonder why we have not pulled these together, to work in concert over time. If we had, Australia would have a world’s best natural resource management framework. However, we have neither integrated these elements at multiple scales nor sustained them. Unfortunately, although we are excellent at innovating, we have been equally good at forgetting. Progress remains partial, patchy and slow. Too often, we have made gains then gone backwards, reflecting a tendency towards policy adhockery and amnesia. With Australia’s continuing depreciation of institutional memory, we risk losing critical capabilities for making sound policy decisions.Australian expertise in revegetation, restoration and regeneration of landscapes remains formidable however, with an enormous amount to offer the world. We are still learning to live and farm more sustainably, but we have made big strides over the last four decades. The challenge will be to maintain the momentum and provide adequate succession so future generations continue the work.

    AB - The past four decades have seen a transformative process in Australian agriculture – the gradual incorporation of conservation practices such as ecological restoration, revegetation and agroforestry as a response to land degradation. Although actions have been impressive they remain fragmented, are confined to particular districts or properties and run the risk of not being built upon in the future. This paper traces the history of this movement and draws out lessons and implications for future policy development and research.Landscape-scale restoration and the integration of conservation into farming landscapes have been recognised as a global imperative for decades, for which Australia has generated many innovations – in the technical, social and policy domains. Scanning the ‘big picture’, we identify many pixels of best practice in policy, incentives, planning, regulation and on-ground practice. We wonder why we have not pulled these together, to work in concert over time. If we had, Australia would have a world’s best natural resource management framework. However, we have neither integrated these elements at multiple scales nor sustained them. Unfortunately, although we are excellent at innovating, we have been equally good at forgetting. Progress remains partial, patchy and slow. Too often, we have made gains then gone backwards, reflecting a tendency towards policy adhockery and amnesia. With Australia’s continuing depreciation of institutional memory, we risk losing critical capabilities for making sound policy decisions.Australian expertise in revegetation, restoration and regeneration of landscapes remains formidable however, with an enormous amount to offer the world. We are still learning to live and farm more sustainably, but we have made big strides over the last four decades. The challenge will be to maintain the momentum and provide adequate succession so future generations continue the work.

    U2 - 10.1071/RJ17056

    DO - 10.1071/RJ17056

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 39

    SP - 405

    EP - 416

    JO - The Rangeland Journal

    JF - The Rangeland Journal

    SN - 1036-9872

    IS - 6

    ER -