Reflections on the framing of 'health equity' in the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework

a cause for celebration or concern?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Issue addressed: There has been a growing national and global focus on the need to address social determinants of health to better achieve equitable health outcomes. In Australia, this focus is now being embedded into state, territory and Commonwealth government health policies. In this paper I use the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework as a case study to examine the way in which ‘health equity’ and other related terms have been framed within a current national health policy context.

    Discussion: Using a critically reflective approach, I argue that primary health care and health promotion professionals need to capitalise on the inclusion of terms such as ‘action on social determinants of health’, ‘health equity’ and ‘reducing inequity’ through emerging national health policies, such as the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework. Yet, there is also a need to proceed with caution. The way in which these terms are framed appears to deviate from the principles, values and ideologies on which they are historically based. The implications for contemporary health promotion practice in Australia are discussed.

    Conclusions: Primary health care and health promotion professionals working in both policy and practice contexts are encouraged to engage in critical reflective practice when interpreting and considering the implementation requirements of national health policies that incorporate a health equity focus.

    So what?: 
    To build health equity in Australia, primary health care and health promotion professionals will be required to engage in the skilful reframing of current primary health care policy discourses relating to health equity during health promotion planning, implementation and evaluation processes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)42-45
    Number of pages4
    JournalHealth Promotion Journal of Australia
    Volume25
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2014

    Fingerprint

    Health Policy
    Health Promotion
    Primary Health Care
    Social Determinants of Health
    Health Planning
    Health Equity
    Health

    Cite this

    @article{69f07b7451b9466e9eb1925694423572,
    title = "Reflections on the framing of 'health equity' in the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework: a cause for celebration or concern?",
    abstract = "Issue addressed: There has been a growing national and global focus on the need to address social determinants of health to better achieve equitable health outcomes. In Australia, this focus is now being embedded into state, territory and Commonwealth government health policies. In this paper I use the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework as a case study to examine the way in which ‘health equity’ and other related terms have been framed within a current national health policy context.Discussion: Using a critically reflective approach, I argue that primary health care and health promotion professionals need to capitalise on the inclusion of terms such as ‘action on social determinants of health’, ‘health equity’ and ‘reducing inequity’ through emerging national health policies, such as the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework. Yet, there is also a need to proceed with caution. The way in which these terms are framed appears to deviate from the principles, values and ideologies on which they are historically based. The implications for contemporary health promotion practice in Australia are discussed.Conclusions: Primary health care and health promotion professionals working in both policy and practice contexts are encouraged to engage in critical reflective practice when interpreting and considering the implementation requirements of national health policies that incorporate a health equity focus.So what?: To build health equity in Australia, primary health care and health promotion professionals will be required to engage in the skilful reframing of current primary health care policy discourses relating to health equity during health promotion planning, implementation and evaluation processes.",
    keywords = "article, Australia, health care policy, health disparity, health promotion, human, methodology, primary health care, social determinants of health, social justice, standard, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Health Status Disparities, Humans, Primary Health Care, Social Determinants of Health, Social Justice",
    author = "James Smith",
    year = "2014",
    month = "4",
    day = "16",
    doi = "10.1071/HE13106",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "42--45",
    journal = "Health Promotion Journal of Australia",
    issn = "1036-1073",
    publisher = "Australian Health Promotion Association",
    number = "1",

    }

    Reflections on the framing of 'health equity' in the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework : a cause for celebration or concern? / Smith, James.

    In: Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Vol. 25, No. 1, 16.04.2014, p. 42-45.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Reflections on the framing of 'health equity' in the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework

    T2 - a cause for celebration or concern?

    AU - Smith, James

    PY - 2014/4/16

    Y1 - 2014/4/16

    N2 - Issue addressed: There has been a growing national and global focus on the need to address social determinants of health to better achieve equitable health outcomes. In Australia, this focus is now being embedded into state, territory and Commonwealth government health policies. In this paper I use the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework as a case study to examine the way in which ‘health equity’ and other related terms have been framed within a current national health policy context.Discussion: Using a critically reflective approach, I argue that primary health care and health promotion professionals need to capitalise on the inclusion of terms such as ‘action on social determinants of health’, ‘health equity’ and ‘reducing inequity’ through emerging national health policies, such as the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework. Yet, there is also a need to proceed with caution. The way in which these terms are framed appears to deviate from the principles, values and ideologies on which they are historically based. The implications for contemporary health promotion practice in Australia are discussed.Conclusions: Primary health care and health promotion professionals working in both policy and practice contexts are encouraged to engage in critical reflective practice when interpreting and considering the implementation requirements of national health policies that incorporate a health equity focus.So what?: To build health equity in Australia, primary health care and health promotion professionals will be required to engage in the skilful reframing of current primary health care policy discourses relating to health equity during health promotion planning, implementation and evaluation processes.

    AB - Issue addressed: There has been a growing national and global focus on the need to address social determinants of health to better achieve equitable health outcomes. In Australia, this focus is now being embedded into state, territory and Commonwealth government health policies. In this paper I use the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework as a case study to examine the way in which ‘health equity’ and other related terms have been framed within a current national health policy context.Discussion: Using a critically reflective approach, I argue that primary health care and health promotion professionals need to capitalise on the inclusion of terms such as ‘action on social determinants of health’, ‘health equity’ and ‘reducing inequity’ through emerging national health policies, such as the National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework. Yet, there is also a need to proceed with caution. The way in which these terms are framed appears to deviate from the principles, values and ideologies on which they are historically based. The implications for contemporary health promotion practice in Australia are discussed.Conclusions: Primary health care and health promotion professionals working in both policy and practice contexts are encouraged to engage in critical reflective practice when interpreting and considering the implementation requirements of national health policies that incorporate a health equity focus.So what?: To build health equity in Australia, primary health care and health promotion professionals will be required to engage in the skilful reframing of current primary health care policy discourses relating to health equity during health promotion planning, implementation and evaluation processes.

    KW - article

    KW - Australia

    KW - health care policy

    KW - health disparity

    KW - health promotion

    KW - human

    KW - methodology

    KW - primary health care

    KW - social determinants of health

    KW - social justice

    KW - standard

    KW - Health Policy

    KW - Health Promotion

    KW - Health Status Disparities

    KW - Humans

    KW - Primary Health Care

    KW - Social Determinants of Health

    KW - Social Justice

    U2 - 10.1071/HE13106

    DO - 10.1071/HE13106

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 42

    EP - 45

    JO - Health Promotion Journal of Australia

    JF - Health Promotion Journal of Australia

    SN - 1036-1073

    IS - 1

    ER -